On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:39:45 -0000, you wrote: >John > >Any further thoughts on what you would like me to do about the errant files >uploaded by your volunteers? > >I propose to correct the files in the following order unless you have any >alternative suggestions? > >SubmitterID No of Errant Files > >BD123 1 >(this file is errant because it has one record is shown as *,*,*,*,*,*) . >The volunteer followed the rules exactly except for this one entry. > >Daves 1 >(this file is errant because it has three records shown with ? in the age >field) . The volunteer followed the rules exactly except for these three >entries. > >RHC 3 >(these three files are errant because all records are shown with * in the >age field) . The volunteer followed the rules exactly for a further seven >other death files which were in numeric page sequence with the three errant >files. This indicates to me the volunteer was aware of the rules pertaining >then and also now. > >Debs 6 >MargSue 10 >Gemini 36 >Mazda 116 >JaniceHughes 138 >rjmc 199 >(it would appear work is taking place by you or your volunteer regarding >correction of rjmc files). > >Just give me a nod as to which files you would like me to correct and if you >have any preferences as to the order and I'll get cracking on them >straightaway? Allan, I'm knocking up a bit of code to allow these files to be semi-automatically fixed, so hang fire! -- Dave Mayall