Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Possible Page Missing
    2. ESSERY Clive
    3. One of my transcribers has told me that pages 237 and 238 in the range G-P of the March Quarter 1860 Deaths appear to be identical. Also from the run of the surnames, there may be some names missing between page 236 and 238. Is it possible that one page was not scanned and that the next page was accidentally scanned twice? Clive Essery Co-ordinator of the LGC Syndicate ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify our Help Desk. Email [email protected] immediately. You should not copy or use this email or attachment(s) for any purpose nor disclose their contents to any other person. NATS computer systems may be monitored and communications carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes. ********************************************************************************************************************************************

    08/18/2004 09:15:55
    1. Re: Possible Page Missing
    2. Bob Phillips
    3. Hi Clive These pages/scans are hand numbered on the right hand page of the index book so alternate scans are hand numbered. Here is a scan number and index page hand number list 1860D1-H-0230.tif 1860D1-H-0231.tif 175 1860D1-H-0232.tif 1860D1-H-0233.tif 17_ 1860D1-H-0234.tif 1860D1-H-0235.tif 177 1860D1-H-0236.tif 1860D1-H-0237.tif 17_ 1860D1-H-0238.tif 17_ 1860D1-H-0239.tif 1860D1-H-0240.tif 179 1860D1-H-0241.tif Conclusion is there are no missing index pages and scans H-0237 and 0238 are identical. cheers Bob Phillips ----- Original Message ----- From: "ESSERY Clive" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 3:15 PM Subject: Possible Page Missing > One of my transcribers has told me that pages 237 and 238 in the range G-P > of the March Quarter 1860 Deaths appear to be identical. > > Also from the run of the surnames, there may be some names missing between > page 236 and 238. Is it possible that one page was not scanned and that the > next page was accidentally scanned twice? > > Clive Essery > Co-ordinator of the LGC Syndicate > > > > ********************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you > are not the intended recipient, please notify our Help Desk. Email > [email protected] immediately. > You should not copy or use this email or attachment(s) for any purpose > nor disclose their contents to any other person. > > NATS computer systems may be monitored and communications > carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the > system and for other lawful purposes. > **************************************************************************** **************************************************************** > > > ==== FREEBMD-SYNDICATES Mailing List ==== > For those in -L mode, to unsubscribe from this mailing list please send the command UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message to - > [email protected] > > ============================== > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more. > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237 > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.740 / Virus Database: 494 - Release Date: 16/08/2004

    08/18/2004 11:11:04