I am discussing with Ian Brooke how the next version of WinBMD can be enhanced to address the problem of the district list getting out of date. The issue is that the District Aliasing Team are continually revising the district information on the system but transcribers using WinBMD are working with an out of date version of this information. The current proposal is that when WinBMD uploads a file to the system it will also download a new version of the district file if one exists. This means that subsequently the transcriber will be working with the new districts list. The transcriber's locally added districts will not be affected by downloading the new districts list. If anyone can see any issues with this, or would like clarification of the proposal, please let me know. Barrie