Hi Debz, Not sure I understand why you feel that the knowledge base article is at odds with the solution provided by Dave? I believe they are in essence saying the same thing! They are definitely trying to solve the same problem. If you can advise in detail why you think they give different advice I will see if we can get the KB article updated to clarify. Cheers Kevin. -----Original Message----- From: Debz [mailto:debzv@vodafone.co.nz] Sent: 03 June 2009 23:46 To: kshdouble@blueyonder.co.uk; freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: 1927-B4-T-0384 Sorry Kevin but it doesn't apply in this case here is what David Mayall said to do which I have done and it was a typo The usual way to deal with rogue pages such as this is; 1. Check that the pages either side have the "correct" header details 2. Check that the first and last names on the page are consistent with the pages either side 3. Check that the first and last names are inconsistent with the page belonging in sequence with the quarter of the header (dec 1928) 4. Check that there is a page in 384 in Q4 1928 that matches that quarter Provided the page checks out, you can assume that the header is a mistake (it usually is, although we did have one infamous case where half of 1887 Q2 Marriages were actually for a different quarter, so it's good to check). An entry in the TKB might be worthwhile. regards Debz : "KSHDouble Syndicate" <kshdouble@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:19 AM To: <freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com> Subject: RE: 1927-B4-T-0384 > Hi Debz, > http://www.freebmd.org.uk/vol_faq.html#6ai > Applies > Kevin. > -----Original Message----- > From: freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Debz > Sent: 03 June 2009 20:06 > To: FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-L > Subject: 1927-B4-T-0384 > > Can I please have help with this problem. > > 1927-B4-T-0384 show 1928 at the top of the scan > > How do I proceed? > > Regards > Debz NZ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Hi Kevin My apologies I missed the (ai) and looked at (a) then scrolled down a bit and couldn't see what you were directing me to. Too much of a hurry I think Regards Debz -------------------------------------------------- From: "KSHDouble Syndicate" <kshdouble@blueyonder.co.uk> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 6:21 PM To: "'Debz'" <debzv@vodafone.co.nz>; <freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com> Subject: RE: 1927-B4-T-0384 > Hi Debz, > Not sure I understand why you feel that the knowledge base article is at > odds with the solution provided by Dave? > > I believe they are in essence saying the same thing! > They are definitely trying to solve the same problem. > > If you can advise in detail why you think they give different advice I > will > see if we can get the KB article updated to clarify. > > Cheers > Kevin. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Debz [mailto:debzv@vodafone.co.nz] > Sent: 03 June 2009 23:46 > To: kshdouble@blueyonder.co.uk; freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: 1927-B4-T-0384 > > Sorry Kevin but it doesn't apply in this case > here is what David Mayall said to do which I have done and it was a typo > > The usual way to deal with rogue pages such as this is; > > 1. Check that the pages either side have the "correct" header details > 2. Check that the first and last names on the page are consistent with > the pages either side > 3. Check that the first and last names are inconsistent with the page > belonging in sequence with the quarter of the header (dec 1928) > 4. Check that there is a page in 384 in Q4 1928 that matches that > quarter > > Provided the page checks out, you can assume that the header is a mistake > (it usually is, although we did have one infamous case where half of 1887 > Q2 > Marriages were actually for a different quarter, so it's good to check). > > An entry in the TKB might be worthwhile. > > regards > Debz > > > > : "KSHDouble Syndicate" <kshdouble@blueyonder.co.uk> > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:19 AM > To: <freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com> > Subject: RE: 1927-B4-T-0384 > >> Hi Debz, >> http://www.freebmd.org.uk/vol_faq.html#6ai >> Applies >> Kevin. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com >> [mailto:freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Debz >> Sent: 03 June 2009 20:06 >> To: FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-L >> Subject: 1927-B4-T-0384 >> >> Can I please have help with this problem. >> >> 1927-B4-T-0384 show 1928 at the top of the scan >> >> How do I proceed? >> >> Regards >> Debz NZ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without >> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >