There is a typo in my posting. The second paragraph should read: Seisden, 17 has been linked to Lexden but the Seisdon, 17 comes up separately. Christopher Richards > I've doing some correcting of old transcriptions and have come across > the Seisdon/Seisden/Lexden issue. > > Seisden has been linked to Lexdon but the Sesidon, 17 comes up separately. > > All the entries for Seisden/Seisdon that I've come across so far are > late entries squeezed into the page. So they are small and hard to be > sure if they read Seisdon or Seisden. However the example on page > 1838D1S0273 is clearly Seisdon when looked at on the equivalent page of > ancestry. Page 171 of 1838>Q1-JAN-FEB-MAR >S. > > I think it would be consistent to link the four examples of Seisdon in > 1838D1 to Lexden. > > Christopher Richards > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >

I've seen this too Mary Trevan FreeBMD District Aliasing Team Coordinator ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Richards" <cmr1chards@blueyonder.co.uk> To: <freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:19 AM Subject: Re: District problem in 1838 > There is a typo in my posting. The second paragraph should read: > > Seisden, 17 has been linked to Lexden but the Seisdon, 17 comes up > separately. > > > Christopher Richards > > > > >> I've doing some correcting of old transcriptions and have come across >> the Seisdon/Seisden/Lexden issue. >> >> Seisden has been linked to Lexdon but the Sesidon, 17 comes up >> separately. >> >> All the entries for Seisden/Seisdon that I've come across so far are >> late entries squeezed into the page. So they are small and hard to be >> sure if they read Seisdon or Seisden. However the example on page >> 1838D1S0273 is clearly Seisdon when looked at on the equivalent page of >> ancestry. Page 171 of 1838>Q1-JAN-FEB-MAR >S. >> >> I think it would be consistent to link the four examples of Seisdon in >> 1838D1 to Lexden. >> >> Christopher Richards >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.16/1926 - Release Date: 01/30/09 17:31:00