We'll look into it Christopher. Aliasing is done at the level of the district name not at the level of an individual entry, so it may not be possible with aliasing alone, and you will not see the results until the update that is due at the end of Feb / start of March completes Mary Trevan FreeBMD District Aliasing Test Coordinator ----- Original Message ----- From: "IGRS Treasurer" <treasurerigrs@blueyonder.co.uk> To: <freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 11:32 AM Subject: District problem in 1838 > I've doing some correcting of old transcriptions and have come across > the Seisdon/Seisden/Lexden issue. > > Seisden has been linked to Lexdon but the Sesidon, 17 comes up separately. > > All the entries for Seisden/Seisdon that I've come across so far are > late entries squeezed into the page. So they are small and hard to be > sure if they read Seisdon or Seisden. However the example on page > 1838D1S0273 is clearly Seisdon when looked at on the equivalent page of > ancestry. Page 171 of 1838>Q1-JAN-FEB-MAR >S. > > I think it would be consistent to link the four examples of Seisdon in > 1838D1 to Lexden. > > Christopher Richards > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.16/1926 - Release Date: 01/30/09 17:31:00