RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. RE: RE: Suspect Files
    2. Brian Smart
    3. Hello Allan, christy26 uploaded 66D10010 on the 29th June but is still on the list. In the case of sjp159/62B20727 the system obviously ignores the fact that there are entries after a +BREAK in the middle of the data. Regards Brian Smart -----Original Message----- From: freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Allan Raymond Sent: 28 July 2010 14:06 To: freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: RE: Suspect Files I would still be interested in knowing from Brian an example of one file which was corrected a couple of months ago but which still appears in the Suspect Report. Strictly if was corrected in line with the original details in the Suspect Report then after amendment (taking into an update) it should disappear from the report. Either the file wasn't corrected in line with the suspect report details or there is a bug in the system? Allan Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: Barrie To: freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:49 PM Subject: Re: RE: Suspect Files Brian, The list is updated approximately weekly. The actual date is in the introductory paragraph. However, some tests are performed during the update and will only change after an update; where this applies to a particular problem it is mentioned in the description of the problem. Barrie On 19:59, Brian Smart wrote: > Hello Barrie, > How often is this file updated. There are a number on the list that were > corrected and uploaded a couple of months ago. > Regards > > Brian Smart > > > -----Original Message----- > From: freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Barrie > Sent: 26 July 2010 21:03 > To: freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com > Subject: Suspect Files > > Please note that there is now only one Suspect Files > <http://www.freebmd.org.uk/SuspectFiles.html> list - aliases in the > associate name are now incorporated into the Suspect Files list and are > not in a separate list (SuspectFilesAlias). Viewing > SuspectFilesAlias.html takes you to the standard Suspect Files list. > > Barrie > > > --Certified Virus Free by 4SecureMail.com ICSA-Certified Scanner-- > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > --Certified Virus Free by 4SecureMail.com ICSA-Certified Scanner-- ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/28/2010 01:15:43
    1. Re: RE: Suspect Files
    2. Allan Raymond
    3. Hi Brian 66D10010 is correctly shown in the Suspect Report because it only contains the first two columns of a three column scan. It was uploaded on 29 June but it was in year 2003 not 2010. You will need to get the extra column inserted into the file to enable it to be removed from the Suspect Report. sjp159/62B20727 I assume is a file which Barrie will need to check out and decide how best to deal with the +BREAK? The scans for this file is quite confusing: We have scans http://images.freebmd.org.uk/GUS/1862/Births/June/UKD-01/1862B2-K-0727.tif and a rescan version http://images.freebmd.org.uk/GUS/1862/Births/June/UKD-01/1862B2-K-0727-rescan.JPG which has different records to that in the scan above. in addition we have a different series scan at: http://images.freebmd.org.uk/GUS/1862/Births/June/ANC-05/1862B2-K-0615.jpg which is similar to the first of the scans above. To be quite fair to the Suspect Report file sjp159/62B20727 is also a file not uploaded during the last couple of months, it was last uploaded 8 January 2002 and the report has picked up a problem with the file due to the +BREAK. This really is where Coordinators are requested to contact the qa coordinator as mentioned at the top of the Suspect Report. Regards Allan Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Smart To: freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:15 PM Subject: RE: RE: Suspect Files Hello Allan, christy26 uploaded 66D10010 on the 29th June but is still on the list. In the case of sjp159/62B20727 the system obviously ignores the fact that there are entries after a +BREAK in the middle of the data. Regards Brian Smart -----Original Message----- From: freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Allan Raymond Sent: 28 July 2010 14:06 To: freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: RE: Suspect Files I would still be interested in knowing from Brian an example of one file which was corrected a couple of months ago but which still appears in the Suspect Report. Strictly if was corrected in line with the original details in the Suspect Report then after amendment (taking into an update) it should disappear from the report. Either the file wasn't corrected in line with the suspect report details or there is a bug in the system? Allan Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: Barrie To: freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 1:49 PM Subject: Re: RE: Suspect Files Brian, The list is updated approximately weekly. The actual date is in the introductory paragraph. However, some tests are performed during the update and will only change after an update; where this applies to a particular problem it is mentioned in the description of the problem. Barrie On 19:59, Brian Smart wrote: > Hello Barrie, > How often is this file updated. There are a number on the list that were > corrected and uploaded a couple of months ago. > Regards > > Brian Smart > > > -----Original Message----- > From: freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:freebmd-syndicates-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Barrie > Sent: 26 July 2010 21:03 > To: freebmd-syndicates@rootsweb.com > Subject: Suspect Files > > Please note that there is now only one Suspect Files > <http://www.freebmd.org.uk/SuspectFiles.html> list - aliases in the > associate name are now incorporated into the Suspect Files list and are > not in a separate list (SuspectFilesAlias). Viewing > SuspectFilesAlias.html takes you to the standard Suspect Files list. > > Barrie > > > --Certified Virus Free by 4SecureMail.com ICSA-Certified Scanner-- > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > --Certified Virus Free by 4SecureMail.com ICSA-Certified Scanner-- ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FREEBMD-SYNDICATES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/28/2010 04:09:31