For those in the know, I initiated PTS task 1740 to cover this work. Barrie was looking at it the other day. As an administrator for two large Syndicates I would like last name (surname) first. Tony, you sent you request direct to me yesterday to split into active and inactive, hence reason why it never appeared on the list. I am not happy about splitting into active and inactive volunteers, if I am searching for somebody I wouldn't wish to look in two lists. Allan Raymond [email protected] http://www.btinternet.com/~allan_raymond/Monarchies_of_Europe.htm FreeBMD - putting birth marriages and deaths on the Internet http://FreeBMD.rootsweb.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Hart" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: 11 August 2001 12:54 Subject: Re: Syndicate Maintenance. Hi, Tony McHugh wrote: > > Following on from Gypsy Teri's comments. I agree that listing the current > syndicate in alphabetical order would make life much easier. I may be wrong > but it looks as though it is sorted in ID order. I also suggested recently, > but it does not seem to have gone to the list, that this box be split in to > active and inactive members. To do that we would have to change the syndicate schema to be able to mark people as inactive or active ... Any views on this and the list order from other syndicate coordinators ? Presumably you want it sorted by Lastname, firstname ? cheers Graham > Teri, you must have a very slow connection, I could add or delete my whole > syndicate (~80 members) in 3 hours. > Tony McHugh, > 1864Births. > > ============================== > Search over 1 Billion names at Ancestry.com! > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist1.asp ============================== Visit Ancestry.com for a FREE 14-Day Trial and enjoy access to the #1 Source for Family History Online. Go to: http://www.ancestry.com/subscribe/subscribetrial1y.asp?sourcecode=F11HB