Following on from Gypsy Teri's comments. I agree that listing the current syndicate in alphabetical order would make life much easier. I may be wrong but it looks as though it is sorted in ID order. I also suggested recently, but it does not seem to have gone to the list, that this box be split in to active and inactive members. Teri, you must have a very slow connection, I could add or delete my whole syndicate (~80 members) in 3 hours. Tony McHugh, 1864Births.

Hi, Tony McHugh wrote: > > Following on from Gypsy Teri's comments. I agree that listing the current > syndicate in alphabetical order would make life much easier. I may be wrong > but it looks as though it is sorted in ID order. I also suggested recently, > but it does not seem to have gone to the list, that this box be split in to > active and inactive members. To do that we would have to change the syndicate schema to be able to mark people as inactive or active ... Any views on this and the list order from other syndicate coordinators ? Presumably you want it sorted by Lastname, firstname ? cheers Graham > Teri, you must have a very slow connection, I could add or delete my whole > syndicate (~80 members) in 3 hours. > Tony McHugh, > 1864Births. > > ============================== > Search over 1 Billion names at Ancestry.com! > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist1.asp