On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 02:01:55 +1000, you wrote: > Dave Mayall wrote..... >>"As transcription and more formal checking proceeds, the people who are given >responsibility for deciding between 2 variant readings by different transcribers will be given >appropriate access to flag entries as incorrect (although they STILL can't alter what you have >>transcribed)" > >Don't know if there may be some technical, philosophical, or logical) reason against this idea..... >if people go to all the trouble to look at the variant readings and decide which one is *definitely* correct; then wouldn't it be better that they be given access to alter what is incorrect and and have *their* id placed against the corrected entry? We want to recognise that even the person resolving the differences might be wrong, so; 1) They *will* enter the correction under their ID. 2) The site will show the "adjudication" as the "favoured" reading, but will still note that there was doubt and that transcriber "abc123" felt it should read "1234" -- Dave Mayall

Hi What about appointing some adjudicators that have access to FRC and have them check disputed records from the actual indexes. These can then be taken as the definitive records and the respective transcribers can then amend their records accordingly. Otherwise we will be in the area of decreasing circles until an orifice appears to disappear into. Regards John Researching - Hykin (Anywhere) Pai(y)n(e) from Kent 1800's Conde Salop. Anytime ----- Original Message ----- From: Dave Mayall <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 9:01 PM Subject: Re: FREEBMD-DISCUSS-D Digest V01 #98 > On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 02:01:55 +1000, you wrote: > > > Dave Mayall wrote..... > >>"As transcription and more formal checking proceeds, the people who are given >responsibility for deciding between 2 variant readings by different transcribers will be given >appropriate access to flag entries as incorrect (although they STILL can't alter what you have > >>transcribed)" > > > >Don't know if there may be some technical, philosophical, or logical) reason against this idea..... > >if people go to all the trouble to look at the variant readings and decide which one is *definitely* correct; then wouldn't it be better that they be given access to alter what is incorrect and and have *their* id placed against the corrected entry? > > We want to recognise that even the person resolving the differences > might be wrong, so; > > 1) They *will* enter the correction under their ID. > 2) The site will show the "adjudication" as the "favoured" reading, > but will still note that there was doubt and that transcriber "abc123" > felt it should read "1234" > > -- > Dave Mayall > > > ============================== > Create a FREE family website at MyFamily.com! > http://www.myfamily.com/banner.asp?ID=RWLIST2 >