Hi, Brian Smart wrote: > > If the information is already held in a database as Graham Hart has said > would it really be a problem. I find the delays between updates a real > problem, and I assume it will only get worse as the size of the database > continues to grow. The problem isn't whether we have the information, its the size of the query to retrieve it which I also mentioned in my response. If it takes too long then it will hold up all other queries and kill searches again .. we do have that problem already with some of the syndicate stuff and it would be silly to add to it ... We'd need to think carefully about how to implement it ... Cheers Graham > > Regards > > Brian Smart > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Mayall [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 21 July 2001 11:45 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Upload Checking for Syndicate Leaders > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 10:21:24 +0100, you wrote: > > >Would it be possible to provide a list showing any files that have been > >uploaded, but not yet incorporated in the main database. > > > >This would work the same way as the "Analyse the data submitted by your > >syndicate" but would only include files as above. > > > >The reason for this request is that the time delay between updates is now > so > >long that I find it very difficult to keep track of progress. > > Possible, but probably *very* intensive on the database. > > -- > Dave Mayall > > ============================== > Visit Ancestry's Library - The best collection of family history > learning and how-to articles on the Internet. > http://www.ancestry.com/learn/library > > ============================== > Visit Ancestry.com for a FREE 14-Day Trial and enjoy access to the #1 > Source for Family History Online. Go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/subscribe/subscribetrial1y.asp?sourcecode=F11HB