----- Original Message ----- From: "John Fairlie" <john.fairlie@blueyonder.co.uk> To: "'Dave Mayall'" <dave@research-group.co.uk>; <FREEBMD-DISCUSS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:29 PM Subject: RE: Latest update > Dave, (and the masses), > > I've got it, by George, I think I've got it!! > > So, does this mean you are now in a good position to extract those double > keyed records that sort of match up, in as much that they are probably the > same record but with differences, and to put them into the stage where > someone decides the real data and arbitrates?? It is a step along the road to that, yes, but not the complete job. We still need quite a bit more code to handle applying the abitration to the data. > If so, that would reduce the number of unique records closer to the number > of distinct records - yes?? Yes. > So, George, have I got it?? It looks like it.