----- Original Message ----- From: "Archer Barrie" <Barrie.Archer@services.fujitsu.com> To: <FREEBMD-DISCUSS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:14 AM Subject: RE: Latest update > Sorry, Dave, you have the example wrong! > > The results would be: > 80 total > 43 distinct > 40 unique > > Your juxtaposition of the meaning of 'distinct' and 'unique' is probably > more logical, but 'distinct' was being used already in the current sense. :-) You are correct! Which also sorts out Allan's question :-)