Allan Raymond wrote: > > Hi Virginia et al > > I like the idea, but as John pointed we must be careful not to have a league table > type approach. Agreed. Trumpeting achievement is good. Drawing comparisons with others is very bad. > I am willing to contribute to the newsletter but am more than happy for somebody > such as yourself to take the lead. It may be useful if subscribers to the discuss > list could say what else they would like to see in the newsletter in addition to > that contained in John Slann's > original email. > > Incidently we do have a "News" mailing list which I assume could be used to > disseminate the Newsletter. If this is to be a fortnightly thing, then I'm not sure that we should do that. News is *very* low volume for people who only want to know about big things, and I suspect they will get very fed up of a chatty mail ever 2 weeks. Also, News is a feed into RWR. Anything we put there is likely to be regurgitated to a mass audience (and attract more searches than we can handle) I suggest Admins, plus an archive on the site. -- Dave Mayall