John, Thank you for your sterling efforts! As a result of implementing the {n,m} construct there were some 300 files that were affected, covering about 170 users. All users were sent emails (8 were bounced) telling them what files were affected, what the error(s) was(were) and how to make a correction. Ideally the users themselves would make the corrections but as you point out there will be cases where this will not happen. We will be making regular checks to determine how the correction process is progressing and at some point the project leadership will have to make a decision about how the remnant should be corrected. Barrie > -----Original Message----- > From: John Pain [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 11 October 2001 22:28 > To: [email protected] > Subject: File Errors > > > Hi All > > I would like to know who will take responsibility for those > files where errors have been found as a result or the latest > check routines. > > I have just checked a qtr that was completed and found that > 10 pages were now missing from the database. > > That particular transcriber appears to upload a file every 3 > months or so, so unless I had looked at and been able to > correct the files, who would have corrected and made records > available in the mean time. > > Had that transcriber 'dropped out' how would those records > get back into the database? > > Of the other 700+ transcribers in this syndicate, how many > more are like that? > > Regards > > John > > Researching - Hykin (Anywhere) > Pai(y)n(e) from Kent 1800's > Conde Salop. Anytime > > PS - Please leave a little of the old message to give me a > clue as to what it's all about. >