Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: Obvious original errors
    2. Dave Mayall
    3. On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:05:02 +0100, you wrote: >In message <[email protected]>, Dave Mayall ><[email protected]> writes >>Philip Powell wrote: >>> >>> I've had a good look round the site to see if there is an answer >>> available but with no success. >>> >>> Is there a mechanism in place to report obvious[0] errors on the >>> original scans? >[snip] > >>At present, there isn't a mechanism. We are developing such a mechanism to >>cater for corrections to the index, whilst still remaining true to the index. >> >>In essence, the record will be transcribed "as is", and a separate record >>will be submitted to record our THEORY about the record. Both will be >>presented in the search results. > >So it would be a good idea for transcribers to keep a record of those >errors until such time as the mechanism is in place? If you insert a line in your upload file that starts #THEORY and explain what you think, we will pick it up :-) -- Dave Mayall

    10/04/2001 03:12:45