John, At the bottom of the scan information is the sentence "If the scan does not contain the entry you may be able to find the scan yourself by clicking here." If you follow that route and find the scan (which is maybe the route you took) you can leave feedback of which scan the entry is actually on. In case this was not clear I have updated the explanation on that page. I left such feedback and now the entry for Alice Nixon gives the right scan. Because of the way the system works every other entry on this page will also now point to the right scan. Having said all that when I tried to leave feedback it threw up an error which I have now corrected. So we have a double success, right scan and bug corrected! Barrie > -----Original Message----- > From: John Wood [mailto:j3o8h5n6@tiscali.co.uk] > Sent: 10 August 2005 14:06 > To: FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Scans containing none sequential pages > > I am a transcriber but found this problem when doing > research. Where do I > report it? > > A search for the birth of Alice Nixon in Barnsley in 1890 gives the > following result :- > > Births Dec 1890 > Nixon Alice Barnsley 9c 181 > > No problem with that, but the spectacles icon points to file :- > LDS-211-000-0951141/1890b4-349.tif > This does not contain the entry for Alice Nixon because of > the way the pages > were scanned. > > LDS-211-000-0951141/1890b4-347.tif contains pages 347 (NEW) & > 350 (NIS - > NOR) > LDS-211-000-0951141/1890b4-349.tif contains pages 349 (NIC-NIS) & 352 > (NOR-NUT) > LDS-211-000-0951141/1890b4-351.tif contains pages 351 (NOR) & > 354 (O'CO - > OLD) > > When asked the following question the answer has to be > "Reject" because page > 350 does not follow 349. > > "You can help future researchers by reporting whether a scan > does or does > not contain the entry by using the buttons below after you > have viewed the > scan. Use Confirm if the scan does contain the entry and > Reject if it does > not." > > I suspect that the problem cannot be fixed without > rescanning, but it will > result in a lot of rejection reports where the actual data is correct. > > John Wood > (laschapas) > > ______________________________ >