RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: Scans in 1863M3
    2. John Slann
    3. Hi Bob, Thank you, I am sure it will prevent problems at the second keying John ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Phillips" <robert.ph@ntlworld.com> To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com>; "John Slann" <john.slann@btinternet.com> Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 3:43 PM Subject: Re: Scans in 1863M3 > Hi John > I uploaded the cleaned scan images. > There is no place to point you in the archives as far as I know. > Which scan that is transcribed doesn't matter as the only difference is > readability. > It is not an ongoing change and a criteria for which scans to be cleaned > has > not been laid down as far as I know. > > As the cleaned scans are obviously causing a problem I will remove them > and > I apologise for any distress or inconvenience this has caused to you or to > the transcriber. > regards > Bob Phillips > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Slann" <john.slann@btinternet.com> > To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 1:51 PM > Subject: Scans in 1863M3 > > >> When this set of scans was allocated to my syndicate I was cautioned that > there where some images that had been missed, so there where gaps in the > scan numbering. From time to time I check to see if the gaps have been > filled before bringing the scans into full use for the syndicate at large. > Last time I checked I found some oddly named scans like this > "1863M3-M-0142-cleaned.jpg". One should never be surprised by things like > this, but have I missed something? Could someone please point me to the > right place in the archives? Should this scan be transcribed in > preference > to 1863M3-M-0142.jpg. Is this an on going change and has a criteria for > which scans are to be cleaned laid down? >> >> Cheers >> >> John >> >> >> >> >> >> ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== >> FreeBMD Transcribers homepage >> http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/vindex.shtml >> >> ============================== >> Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the >> areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. >> Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx >> > >

    10/23/2005 10:20:51