On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:58:45 +0100 "Martin Cope" <m_cope@btinternet.com> wrote: Hello Martin, > I guess he's not aware of that and has been fooled by a delay between > a database update appearing on the FreeBMD site and then being > transferred to the Ancestry site. > Does anybody know how long this delay is typically? It can be as much as 3 months, I believe. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent"

Thanks Brad, Took my cue from your 'sig' and on closer inspection, the Ancestry search page reveals all. "This database was last updated February 2005." Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brad Rogers" <brad@fineby.me.uk> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 8:18 PM > On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:58:45 +0100 > "Martin Cope" <m_cope@btinternet.com> wrote: > > Hello Martin, > >> I guess he's not aware of that and has been fooled by a delay between >> a database update appearing on the FreeBMD site and then being >> transferred to the Ancestry site. >> Does anybody know how long this delay is typically? > > It can be as much as 3 months, I believe. > > -- > Regards _ > / ) "The blindingly obvious is > / _)rad never immediately apparent" > > ______________________________

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:03:19 +0100 "Martin Cope" <m_cope@btinternet.com> wrote: Hello Martin, > Thanks Brad, You're welcome, Martin. > Took my cue from your 'sig' and on closer inspection, the Ancestry It's one of the reasons I still use it. :-) > "This database was last updated February 2005." So, even more out of date than I thought. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent"