Hi Evan, Sounds like I didn't explain myself well enough. If as a transcriber you are aware of an error in your transcription is is always worth making the change. N.B. Just becuase I have uploaded an entry, it does NOT mean that your entry is wrong. I am just as prone to errors as anyone. The point I was trying to make is that If you submit a formal correction request to an entry, and are asking for the entry to be changed to be IDENTICAL to one I have already uploaded. No change will be made to the database. The fact that I have already uploaded an entry means that the original transcriber does not agree with the change or is no longer part of the project. The system will not allow me to upload an entry twice. If you have any further queries, please feel free to write to me direct, or move the discussion to the Discuss list. Thanks Kevin. FreeBMD Corrections Coordinator > -----Original Message----- > From: Evan Smith [mailto:evan_smith@optusnet.com.au] > Sent: 05 September 2005 12:39 > To: kevin.s.howell@blueyonder.co.uk; FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: Corrections Coordinator entries > > > Kevin- > > Thanks for your detailed comment. > Re your N.B. - You say if you've uploaded an entry, there is no > point in my > submitting a correction to my transcription to make it identical to yours. > Would it be to the advantage of the FreeBMD index if, on seeing yours, I > edited out my incorrect entry (if I thought it was or could be incorrect). > This would reduce the number of incorrect entries in the index, and there > are millions of them. > This comment is no reflection on our transcribers. I have transcribed may > thousand entries - marriages 1846 & 1848 on fiche-and I know the > difficulties. Many entries are virtually indecipherable in at least one > element, usually the page number, or part thereof. > > Or have I got it all wrong? > > Evan S > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin.S.Howell" <kevin.s.howell@blueyonder.co.uk> > To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:33 AM > Subject: RE: Corrections Coordinator entries > > > > Hi Nick, > > I like curious people. It makes me think about what I'm doing :) > > > > When I receive correction requests, I validate them and > assuming they are > > valid I do one of the following > > > > 1) If the correcton is to uncertain Characters I upload the new entry > > myself. > > 2) If the transcriber is still actively working for the project and > accepts > > correction requests, details are forwarded to the transcriber. > > 3) Other definate corrections are uploaded under my submitterID. > > > > So six of your corrections fell into category 2) above and the > amendments > > were accepted by the transcriber and their file was duly updated and has > > been included in the database. > > > > The other four entries are either categories 1) or 3) (or were > in category > > 2, but where the changes were not made to the transcribers file within > about > > 3 months) and have thefore been uploaded by me. > > > > Category 3) corrections do leave "incorrect" information in the > database, > > but the project works on the basis that a submitter "Owns" > their files and > > as such I have no authority to change them. Later stages of the project > > will deal with this ambiguiaty. > > > > I take the trouble to upload entries I believe to be correct so that the > > database includes what I believe to be valid entries. The facility to > view > > the scan images from which the entries were transcribed give > the searcher > > the ability to make their own interpretation in the case of a > disagreement > > between the various transcribers. > > > > N.B. If I have already uploaded an entry there is NO point in > submitting > a > > correction against an entry to make it identical to mine, as I > would only > > have uploaded iut if the original entry cannot be updated. > > > > Longer term, once a period has been fully double keyed and the > appropriate > > tools have been developed, all entries which differ will be cheked by > > independant groups of people (not the original transcribers) > and disimilar > > entries will be force aligned to a valid entry. The other entries will > > still be available for display. > > > > The comments are added to identify the information source which has been > > used to when validate the correction. The reference number allows me to > > link this entry back to the original correction request. If correction > > submitters supply additional background information, then sometimes this > > also finds its way into the comments. This would however be > the exception > > as I have no way of validating this additional information. > > > > Hope that helps. > > Kevin. > > FreeBMD Corrections Coordinator. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Nick Allwork [mailto:allwork@pacificcoast.net] > > > Sent: 30 August 2005 01:31 > > > To: FreeBMD-Admins-l@rootsweb.com > > > Subject: Corrections Coordinator entries > > > > > > > > > Hello > > > A few months ago I submitted 10 corrections ( all in the name of > > > Allwork ). Of these, 4 ( 3 in Births and 1 in Marriages now > > > appear as duplicate entries (without the italicized location) > > > below the original entry (with the italicized location). > > > Beside the Corrections Coordinator's entry the Info box appears > > > with a ? [ Info ] ?. > > > > > > The 6 other corrections that were made don't show [ Info ] ?, It > > > appears that these corrections were fully accepted and have > > > become the new normal data. > > > > > > Could you please explain the use of [ Info ] ? in > > > circumstances that satisfy your internal data testing while > > > leaving in the original entry that did not pass the internal data > > > testing that gave rise to the italicized location name in the first > place? > > > > > > You are doing a fabulous job and I hope this won't be seen as > > > critical. I'm curious. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Nick Allwork > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== > > FreeBMD - http://FreeBMD.rootsweb.com > > > > ============================== > > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > >

In 1877 qtr 4 deaths page 1 I have a dash in age at death field - Help stresses that ? is only for a completely blank field - should I just enter a dash or is there some other solution? Thank you Christine