Hi Richard I suspect that either the local registrar was rather slaphappy about when he sent in his returns, or the indexers simply forgot that the district existed. In 1840B1 the page numbers range from 186 to 186A up to 186H In 1840B2 they range from 182 to 182E They seem to have sorted out the problem by 1840B3. We were a bit mystified when we first came across it. Regards Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Oliver" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 7:07 PM Subject: Oddity with District Stockbridge,VII > Two of my transcribers have reported and queried an anomaly they found on > 1839 December Births. In both cases the District was Stockbridge,VII. > > On page-scan 1839B4-W-0072.jpg, at the second line, the Page No. for > Stockbridge,VII is correctly shown as 172, but a small mark added above it > looks like a figure '9'. Five pages later, on page-scan > 1839B4-W-0077.jpg at about the 30th line of records, Stockbridge,VII again > appears with Page No. 172, but here is topped with a different mark, > resembling a capital 'F'. Has anyone come across this before, and is > there an explanation we haven't thought of? > > Richard Oliver > Madrid, Spain > [email protected] > FreeBMD-Admins mailing list - archive > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/freebmd-admins > FreeBMD http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >