Well said Mildred. Vicky From: freebmd-admins-request@rootsweb.com Subject: FREEBMD-ADMINS Digest, Vol 6, Issue 72 To: freebmd-admins@rootsweb.com Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 01:00:51 -0600 --Forwarded Message Attachment-- From: mfk@nasmith.org.uk To: freebmd-admins@rootsweb.com Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:17:17 +0100 Subject: Re: District Pick List Can we call a halt to the waspish emails about the district list (and any other list)? I think we are lucky to have these lists at all and so don’t have to type everything out in full. Long live common sense when needed! Mildred --Forwarded Message Attachment-- From: brian@bmclark.plus.com To: freebmd-admins@rootsweb.com Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:56:43 +0100 Subject: Re: DISTRICT LIST The transcriber did ask Scan2 for an explanation but I forgot to reply. She was using v6 of WinbMD but seems to have gone back to v5 for some reason. I'll contact her off-line. Regards Brian On 18 May 2011 at 17:21, Jane Karaca wrote: > I am transcribing file 1950M4S0121 and WinBMD will not let me submit > it because there is an invalid number (1) in district > Nthmbld.N.1st,1b. I have used this district many times without > problems and I see it is still included in the list of current > districts. How do I override this please? ---------------------- > janekaraca@fastmail.fm FreeBMD-Admins mailing list - archive > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/freebmd-admins FreeBMD > http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/ >