RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. RE: 1845B4-A-0102.jpg
    2. Kate McGee
    3. Thank you for your help Jeff I have gone with your suggestion of combining everything in a one line #COMMENT Kate -----Original Message----- From: freebmd-admins-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:freebmd-admins-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Coleman Sent: Tuesday, 31 May 2011 11:55 PM To: freebmd-admins@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: 1845B4-A-0102.jpg This is just a suggestion Ayre Richard Northallerton XXIV 437 #COMMENT handwritten amendment XXIV to original volume XIV with ? and 24 also written in Given that the district for XIV 437 would be Lincoln, which looks nothing like Northallerton, it seems that at some point various attempts have been made to correct the volume. It could be argued that following TKB 6(am) there ought to be two lines, one with XIV and one with XXIV, with a #COMMENT(2) line. As it is clear that XXIV is a correction for XIV I suggest that application of TKB 6(am) is not appropriate. The ? and 24 seem worthy of mention, but only in a comment line, I suggest. Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kate McGee" <kmcgee@webone.com.au> To: <freebmd-admins@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 2:30 PM Subject: 1845B4-A-0102.jpg Help and advice please, I have never come across an entry like this and am not sure of how to transcribe it. Line 3 of the scan shows Ayre Richard Northallerton ? XIV 437 Above the volume no. is written XXIV which is correct for Northallerton and alongside it is numeric 24. I think the ? was written at the same time. It's possible the district is incorrect but the page number is within the range for Northallerton. Cheers Kate FreeBMD-Admins mailing list - archive http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/freebmd-admins FreeBMD http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FREEBMD-ADMINS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3671 - Release Date: 05/31/11

    06/01/2011 03:43:05