Hi Jacky, Remember that you should transcribe what you see ... of course, use people's suggestions to help you but you should transcribe what you see... if you don't see karen-happuch you shouldn't transcribe it as such. Of course, if that is what you see, then fine ... Cheers Graham Jacky Middleton wrote: > Dear Fellow Head-Scratchers, > My salvation has appeared in the person of Joolz or Julia. > She has found Karen-Happuch, and it is a biblical name! I have to admit that I was inclined to day-dream through RE classes at school! > I'm so glad I asked the List. > Jacky. > Jacky Middleton in Ancaster, Lincolnshire > > > ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== > List archives > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/freebmd-admins > > ============================== > Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for > ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx > > >

Hi Jacky, Happuch looks okay to me but, looking two names below at 'Margaret', but what you read as the first 'n' in 'Konn' could be 're'. The first letter could be 'o' 'a' 'e', giving Koren, Karen or Keren. But, see http://www.behindthename.com/php/view.php?name=keren01happuch Bill Hounslow http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-2147.jpg >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jacky Middleton [mailto:jacky@kevock.freeserve.co.uk] >>Sent: 02 November 2005 18:00 >>To: FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com >>Subject: Can anyone read this name? >> >>Dear Fellow Head-Scratchers, >> On 1844B3-W-0385, 18th line from the top, I have:- >> >> Wilks, Konn-Happuch, Shipston,XI,364. >> >> IF anyone else has come upon this name or reads something >>different, >>please come to my rescue! >> Does anyone know of the name's origin? Would it be an obscure >>Biblical character? >> >> Best wishes, >> Jacky (A beginner) >>Jacky Middleton in Ancaster, Lincolnshire >> >> >> >>==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== >>List archives >>http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/freebmd-admins >> >>============================== >>Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the >>areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. >>Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx >> >>-- >>No virus found in this incoming message. >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.7/155 - Release Date: 01/11/2005 >> -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.7/155 - Release Date: 01/11/2005

Hi Jacky, Happuch looks okay to me but, looking two names below at 'Margaret', but what you read as the second 'n' in 'Konn' could be 're'. The first letter could be 'o' 'a' 'e', giving Koren, Karen or Keren. But, see http://www.behindthename.com/php/view.php?name=keren01happuch Bill Hounslow http://www.boincsynergy.com/images/stats/comb-2147.jpg >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jacky Middleton [mailto:jacky@kevock.freeserve.co.uk] >>Sent: 02 November 2005 18:00 >>To: FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com >>Subject: Can anyone read this name? >> >>Dear Fellow Head-Scratchers, >> On 1844B3-W-0385, 18th line from the top, I have:- >> >> Wilks, Konn-Happuch, Shipston,XI,364. >> >> IF anyone else has come upon this name or reads something >>different, >>please come to my rescue! >> Does anyone know of the name's origin? Would it be an obscure >>Biblical character? >> >> Best wishes, >> Jacky (A beginner) >>Jacky Middleton in Ancaster, Lincolnshire >> >> >> >>==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== >>List archives >>http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/freebmd-admins >> >>============================== >>Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the >>areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. >>Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx >> >>-- >>No virus found in this incoming message. >>Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.7/155 - Release Date: 01/11/2005 >> -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.7/155 - Release Date: 01/11/2005

I have found this name - Keren-happuch - several times, in census returns, bmd indexes, and in my own family in the 1800s. Lesley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joolz" <joolzratbag@dsl.pipex.com> To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 6:15 PM Subject: Re: Can anyone read this name? > Hi Jacky, > I don't know how to look at the page without a URL, but could it be > Keren-Happuch ? > http://www.biblelearn.com/east2176.htm > > regards, > Julia > > >> Wilks, Konn-Happuch, Shipston,XI,364. >> >> IF anyone else has come upon this name or reads something >> different, >> please come to my rescue! >> Does anyone know of the name's origin? Would it be an obscure >> Biblical character? > > > ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== > Want to help FreeBMD? > Go to http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/Signup.html to find out how. > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > >

In message <03d201c5dfd9$7a97c070$0300a8c0@D91GYL0J>, Joolz <joolzratbag@dsl.pipex.com> writes >Hi Jacky, >I don't know how to look at the page without a URL, but could it be >Keren-Happuch ? >http://www.biblelearn.com/east2176.htm > That certainly looks like a possibility. I suspect I would have transcribed it as K[eo]__n-Happuch - compare the unclear letters with Henry a few lines above. -- Philip Powell Looking north across the Derwent Valley and Northumberland to The Cheviot

Dear Fellow Head-Scratchers, My salvation has appeared in the person of Joolz or Julia. She has found Karen-Happuch, and it is a biblical name! I have to admit that I was inclined to day-dream through RE classes at school! I'm so glad I asked the List. Jacky. Jacky Middleton in Ancaster, Lincolnshire

Hi Jacky, I don't know how to look at the page without a URL, but could it be Keren-Happuch ? http://www.biblelearn.com/east2176.htm regards, Julia > Wilks, Konn-Happuch, Shipston,XI,364. > > IF anyone else has come upon this name or reads something different, > please come to my rescue! > Does anyone know of the name's origin? Would it be an obscure > Biblical character?

Dear Fellow Head-Scratchers, On 1844B3-W-0385, 18th line from the top, I have:- Wilks, Konn-Happuch, Shipston,XI,364. IF anyone else has come upon this name or reads something different, please come to my rescue! Does anyone know of the name's origin? Would it be an obscure Biblical character? Best wishes, Jacky (A beginner) Jacky Middleton in Ancaster, Lincolnshire

Please do no be mislead by the rename button on the "File management" screen you should use the View/Edit button and very carefully change the information there. You will find the official version of how to change header details by following this link: http://www2.freebmd.org.uk/cgi/bmd-files.pl and then login and click on the rename button, the middle paragraph refers Cheers John ----- Original Message ----- From: "PAT SAVAGE" <pat.savage@btopenworld.com> To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 8:08 AM Subject: Changing Header > Can anyone help one of my transcribers? She has tried to change the > quarter details on an already uploaded file and it does not appear to > change. Anyone got any tips? > Pat Savage > > > ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== > List archives > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/freebmd-admins > > ============================== > View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find > marriage announcements and more. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx > >

Hi Pat When changing either the header details or the file name of a transcript if these changes relate to year, event or quarter the changes must be made to all items at the same time. This is accomplished by using RENAME in FILE MANAGEMENT After the new name has been entered to reflect the change select the RENAME/EDIT FILE button on the same page. Change the header detail to reflect the change. This is a fairly new thing in FreeBMD so I haven't tried it myself good luck Bob Phillips ----- Original Message ----- From: "PAT SAVAGE" <pat.savage@btopenworld.com> To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 8:08 AM Subject: Changing Header > Can anyone help one of my transcribers? She has tried to change the quarter details on an already uploaded file and it does not appear to change. Anyone got any tips? > Pat Savage > > > ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== > List archives > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/freebmd-admins > > ============================== > View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find > marriage announcements and more. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx >

Can anyone help one of my transcribers? She has tried to change the quarter details on an already uploaded file and it does not appear to change. Anyone got any tips? Pat Savage

We are in the realms of discussing about policy which is not proper to the Admins List. However to put this particular slant to bed. Official policy is to use double keying as the norm for checking accuracy. However where the error rate is high we may request a third keying to take place. However let's not worry too much at this stage of play as we still have a lot of single keying to complete followed by second keying. I should add we already have done quite a lot of second keying Allan Raymond FreeBMD Co-ordinator of Syndicates ----- Original Message ----- From: "LH ARC FBMD" <RCooksonFBMD@dsl.pipex.com> To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: 28 October 2005 08:44 Subject: RE: Rescanning policy I would like to support Peter Coggin's view Would it be possible that if, where there are considerable differences between the a) transcription and the b) transcription AND the b) transcription was done from a higher quality scan that a c) transcription be instigated. Speaking personally, I would rather increase the workload on the transcribers (ie me) to ensure a higher level of accuracy. As Peter rightly says, the sterling efforts of the original a) copy transciber would not have been wasted. Regards Roger Cookson -----Original Message----- From: Peter Goggin [mailto:prgoggin@swiftdsl.com.au] Sent: 25 October 2005 01:18 To: FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: Rescanning policy Seems to me that some people are more concerned with their reputation for accuracy rather than the accuracy of the transcribed index. Obviously the best possible scans should be used for each keying. If a better scan becomes available after I have keyed a scan and the rekeyer gets a better result than me then it is for the benefit of all of us. It does not diminish the work put in on the original keying. Regards Peter Goggin -----Original Message----- From: Allan Raymond [mailto:allan_raymond@btinternet.com] Sent: Monday, 24 October 2005 11:56 PM To: FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: Rescanning policy John To clarify a couple of your points. 1. I requested you raise this issue via the Syndicate List, as your expressed concern that Co-ordinators should have an input into any rescanning processes. I for one would like to have defined rescanning process for all to see, which was the basis of our off list discussions. 2. You are in the realms of discussing Policy which is what the DISCUSS list is for. I would recommend that continuance of the discussion is via the Syndicates list or the DISCUSS list. 3. Second Keying will be done using the best source available at that time. We have previously reported our intention to replace poor quality scans please see our News Page at: http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/news.html . 4. You can't possibly be suggesting that where we have supplied pristine new scans that double keying is undertaken using the previous poor quality scans? Regards Allan Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Slann" <john.slann@btinternet.com> To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: 24 October 2005 14:16 Subject: Rescanning policy I have been discussing the absence of a rescan policy with Allan Raymond and he has suggested I raise the matter on the Admins list. He told me a fortnight ago that he would take up the matter of a rescan policy with the Team. More recently he advised that he is sill waiting a response from other team members. And added; One of the main players Dave Mayall has been absent for about a fortnight and I understand from a message I received a couple of days ago he will be off for another couple of weeks. I am a whole hearted supporter of Bob Phillips and his team in their endeavours to re-photograph the poorer quality images as long as they confine their efforts to transcriber requested rescans. Unfortunately they are not doing this and Bob has told me they are ignoring transcriber rescan requests. From the evidence of their efforts on behalf of my syndicate, the criteria they have adopted for selection means they have only picked up a handful of transcriber requested rescans I am convinced that the uploading of non-transcriber rescans requests must stop immediately. If this is not done we are piling up confusion and mayhem when the time comes for the second keying. The uploading of non-requested rescans places coordinators in a difficult position. In effect they are forced to get these unasked-for scans redone. If they are not redone the likelihood is that the second keying will be done using an enhanced image with the probability of an increased numbers of mismatched against the first keying. Second keying should only be done using the same source material. I have monitored and had a contingency plan for getting the approximately 3000 transcriber rescans generated by my syndicate members done when the new material was available. By extrapolating the numbers of non-transciber rescans that have been done within one quarter to all the work done by my syndicate, I find that the program that is underway will generate between 8000 and 10000 pages to be transcribed. The work in getting transcriber requested rescans re-done or amended is considerable, but the addition of unasked for rescans creates an unwelcome and unwanted addition. The handling of rescans is more time consuming than allocating and monitoring transcriber progress. The rescanned material is scattered randomly through a series of scans and whilst it is possible to isolate the new material it is also spread amongst (in my case) 40 or 50 transcribers at least. Each needs an e-mail for each batch of rescans to be done. ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== Need to get a fast answer to your transcribing problems? Go to the Transcribers Knowledge Base at http://FreeBMD.RootsWeb.com/vol_faq.html ============================== Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/147 - Release Date: 24/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/147 - Release Date: 24/10/2005 ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== Need to get a fast answer to your transcribing problems? Go to the Transcribers Knowledge Base at http://FreeBMD.RootsWeb.com/vol_faq.html ============================== Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== List archives http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/freebmd-admins ============================== Find your ancestors in the Birth, Marriage and Death Records. New content added every business day. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13964/rd.ashx

Where something is missing you insert a question mark ? . Please check out "Hints and Help For Beginners" at: http://www2.freebmd.org.uk/beginhelp.shtml ? Scroll down to "Uncertain character format". In this case as the missing surname seems to be Martin, you can add #THEORY(2)after the first line containing the ? similar to : ?,Jane,Gainsbro etc #THEORY(2) Surname should be Martin ?,Jane,Newton etc Further information on the use of #THEORY(n) is also in the "Hints and Help For Beginners" document, scroll down to "Using #THEORY" Allan Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joan France" <Joan.France@blueyonder.co.uk> To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: 28 October 2005 13:38 Subject: missing surnames I am currently transcribing scan 1851M4-M-0178 which is a double page scan comprised entirely of the surname Martin. However, the surname has been omitted in the last two entries of the first page, but the second page continues with the surname Martin. I cannot follow the rule of "type what you see" as there is nothing there to see, but should I leave the surnames off these two entries or should I insert the name Martin. Joan France (ID-2260)

I am currently transcribing scan 1851M4-M-0178 which is a double page scan comprised entirely of the surname Martin. However, the surname has been omitted in the last two entries of the first page, but the second page continues with the surname Martin. I cannot follow the rule of "type what you see" as there is nothing there to see, but should I leave the surnames off these two entries or should I insert the name Martin. Joan France (ID-2260)

I would like to support Peter Coggin's view Would it be possible that if, where there are considerable differences between the a) transcription and the b) transcription AND the b) transcription was done from a higher quality scan that a c) transcription be instigated. Speaking personally, I would rather increase the workload on the transcribers (ie me) to ensure a higher level of accuracy. As Peter rightly says, the sterling efforts of the original a) copy transciber would not have been wasted. Regards Roger Cookson -----Original Message----- From: Peter Goggin [mailto:prgoggin@swiftdsl.com.au] Sent: 25 October 2005 01:18 To: FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: Rescanning policy Seems to me that some people are more concerned with their reputation for accuracy rather than the accuracy of the transcribed index. Obviously the best possible scans should be used for each keying. If a better scan becomes available after I have keyed a scan and the rekeyer gets a better result than me then it is for the benefit of all of us. It does not diminish the work put in on the original keying. Regards Peter Goggin -----Original Message----- From: Allan Raymond [mailto:allan_raymond@btinternet.com] Sent: Monday, 24 October 2005 11:56 PM To: FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: Rescanning policy John To clarify a couple of your points. 1. I requested you raise this issue via the Syndicate List, as your expressed concern that Co-ordinators should have an input into any rescanning processes. I for one would like to have defined rescanning process for all to see, which was the basis of our off list discussions. 2. You are in the realms of discussing Policy which is what the DISCUSS list is for. I would recommend that continuance of the discussion is via the Syndicates list or the DISCUSS list. 3. Second Keying will be done using the best source available at that time. We have previously reported our intention to replace poor quality scans please see our News Page at: http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/news.html . 4. You can't possibly be suggesting that where we have supplied pristine new scans that double keying is undertaken using the previous poor quality scans? Regards Allan Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Slann" <john.slann@btinternet.com> To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: 24 October 2005 14:16 Subject: Rescanning policy I have been discussing the absence of a rescan policy with Allan Raymond and he has suggested I raise the matter on the Admins list. He told me a fortnight ago that he would take up the matter of a rescan policy with the Team. More recently he advised that he is sill waiting a response from other team members. And added; One of the main players Dave Mayall has been absent for about a fortnight and I understand from a message I received a couple of days ago he will be off for another couple of weeks. I am a whole hearted supporter of Bob Phillips and his team in their endeavours to re-photograph the poorer quality images as long as they confine their efforts to transcriber requested rescans. Unfortunately they are not doing this and Bob has told me they are ignoring transcriber rescan requests. From the evidence of their efforts on behalf of my syndicate, the criteria they have adopted for selection means they have only picked up a handful of transcriber requested rescans I am convinced that the uploading of non-transcriber rescans requests must stop immediately. If this is not done we are piling up confusion and mayhem when the time comes for the second keying. The uploading of non-requested rescans places coordinators in a difficult position. In effect they are forced to get these unasked-for scans redone. If they are not redone the likelihood is that the second keying will be done using an enhanced image with the probability of an increased numbers of mismatched against the first keying. Second keying should only be done using the same source material. I have monitored and had a contingency plan for getting the approximately 3000 transcriber rescans generated by my syndicate members done when the new material was available. By extrapolating the numbers of non-transciber rescans that have been done within one quarter to all the work done by my syndicate, I find that the program that is underway will generate between 8000 and 10000 pages to be transcribed. The work in getting transcriber requested rescans re-done or amended is considerable, but the addition of unasked for rescans creates an unwelcome and unwanted addition. The handling of rescans is more time consuming than allocating and monitoring transcriber progress. The rescanned material is scattered randomly through a series of scans and whilst it is possible to isolate the new material it is also spread amongst (in my case) 40 or 50 transcribers at least. Each needs an e-mail for each batch of rescans to be done. ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== Need to get a fast answer to your transcribing problems? Go to the Transcribers Knowledge Base at http://FreeBMD.RootsWeb.com/vol_faq.html ============================== Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/147 - Release Date: 24/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.5/147 - Release Date: 24/10/2005 ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== Need to get a fast answer to your transcribing problems? Go to the Transcribers Knowledge Base at http://FreeBMD.RootsWeb.com/vol_faq.html ============================== Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx

Have I got round this uploading impossible pages with no data content except a #COMMENT line that the page is illegible. Does this trigger rescanning? Melda Brunette, Brunette Syndicate Brian Smart wrote: Hello All, I have already given my agreement to rescanning if uploaded files have more than a given level of UCFs but there is one thing that does need to be taken into account. That is scans that have never been transcribed as the scan is so bad as to make it impractical. Hence before Bob starts photographing a group of scans, he does need to check with the Syndicate leader to provide a list of scans that were never transcribed. Regards Brian Smart

I am not seeing this in my receipt of email (obviously as I would have done something). Everything looks fine from this end and RootsWeb's listmaster has given the list a thorough review on the server and if it is happening on their server, it is inexplicable. Someone who is receiving the digest who is the on the -L subscription, if they would be so kind as to forward the digest to me with COMPLETE raw/full headers so that I can do a path trace. Regards Andrew List-admin for FreeBMD-Admins mailing list -> Visit http://FreeBMD.rootsweb.com On 26 Oct 2005 at 22:26, bronny.slowe wrote: > I have recently been receiving admins digest emails although I am only subscribed to List - the one pasted below is the 4th I have received, with 2 others in my inbox. > Why is this happening and who do I ask? > ======================================== > Message Received: Oct 25 2005, 08:36 AM > From: FreeBMD-Admins-D-request@rootsweb.com > To: FreeBMD-Admins-D@rootsweb.com > Cc: > Subject: FreeBMD-Admins-D Digest V05 #200 > > > [ (no name for attachment) (1.6 Kb) ] > [ Rescanning policy (2.8 Kb) ] > [ Re: Rescanning policy (3.9 Kb) ] > [ RE: Rescanning policy (2.4 Kb) ] > [ Unknown Character (0.9 Kb) ] > [ Unsubscribe (0.5 Kb) ] > [ Re: bouquets (0.8 Kb) ] > [ RE: Rescanning policy (5.3 Kb) ] > [ Out of Sequence warning in WINBMD (0.6 Kb) ] > > ______________________________

Greetings. If you are using WinBMD you need a comma, not a semi-colon, between the District and the District number. Market Bosworth is often abbreviated to Mt Bosworth so it was probably a good idea to add it to your picklist. HTH -- Anne ----- Original Message ----- From: "K.DUMMETT" <K.DUMMETT@ntlworld.com> To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 5:21 PM Subject: Unlisted District Name/Number > While transcribing 1861 marriages, I came across what looked like Mt > Bosworth,7a. Wasn't on list of districts that I have, I consulted the > website for help and there was a suggestion to type ;7a Tab, which would > bring up a list of all districts with that number. It wouldn't let me put > the semi-colon so I was still stuck. As it happens, that exact District > and Number was in the help section as an answer to another query, so I > added it to my picklist. Was this correct, and why couldn't I use the > semi-colon? > > Thanks > > Karen > -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/146 - Release Date: 21/10/2005

Yes, I'm in exactly the same position as you, Bronny. Pat. ----- Original Message ----- From: "bronny.slowe" <bronny.slowe@ntlworld.com> To: <FreeBMD-Admins-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 5:26 AM Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Admins digest >I have recently been receiving admins digest emails although I am only >subscribed to List - the one pasted below is the 4th I have received, with >2 others in my inbox. > Why is this happening and who do I ask? > ======================================== > Message Received: Oct 25 2005, 08:36 AM > From: FreeBMD-Admins-D-request@rootsweb.com > To: FreeBMD-Admins-D@rootsweb.com > Cc: > Subject: FreeBMD-Admins-D Digest V05 #200 > > > [ (no name for attachment) (1.6 Kb) ] > [ Rescanning policy (2.8 Kb) ] > [ Re: Rescanning policy (3.9 Kb) ] > [ RE: Rescanning policy (2.4 Kb) ] > [ Unknown Character (0.9 Kb) ] > [ Unsubscribe (0.5 Kb) ] > [ Re: bouquets (0.8 Kb) ] > [ RE: Rescanning policy (5.3 Kb) ] > [ Out of Sequence warning in WINBMD (0.6 Kb) ] > > > > > ==== FreeBMD-Admins Mailing List ==== > Need to get a fast answer to your transcribing problems? Go to the > Transcribers Knowledge Base at http://FreeBMD.RootsWeb.com/vol_faq.html > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

Hello All, I have already given my agreement to rescanning if uploaded files have more than a given level of UCFs but there is one thing that does need to be taken into account. That is scans that have never been transcribed as the scan is so bad as to make it impractical. Hence before Bob starts photographing a group of scans, he does need to check with the Syndicate leader to provide a list of scans that were never transcribed. Regards Brian Smart