I think the opposite! Born Nov 1858, baptised Feb 1859, senior moment was his recording of the birth date! On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Viola Wiggins via < [email protected]> wrote: > I'd bet on the baptism being Feb 1860. The clerk just had a senior moment. > Viola > > Sent from my iPad > > > On 12 Apr 2016, at 10:41, Dave H. via <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I have someone born 26 Nov 1859 in Cumberland Ottawa... who was baptized > > on 6th Feb 1859!! > > > > Have seen Church record! > > > > Obviously incorrect, so what would next step be for me please? > > > > > > DH > > > > --- > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > > ========================= > > https://www.facebook.com/groups/FermanaghGold/ > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ========================= > https://www.facebook.com/groups/FermanaghGold/ > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

The problem is it is entered a couple of years later!! Dave. On 12/04/2016 22:12, wendy stevenson wrote: > I think the opposite! Born Nov 1858, baptised Feb 1859, senior moment > was his recording of the birth date! --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus