Dear Group From what I have figured out so far from the leases of the Burnside's in County Fermanagh is that a James Burnside of Corlough as far as I can see had three sons and two daughter's by these leases. In the 1774 lease at Corlough he took out a lease for his eldest son Thomas aged about seven so born about 1766 , his second son  William aged about five in 1774 so born about 1768 and James Burnside took out a lease in 1803 for land in Corlough naming his third son James Burnside aged 28 as one of the lives in the lease making him born about 1774 . Plus rather think that the young George Hoey aged about five and the son of Andrew of Killercren ( has to be Killycreen) and John Delap aged about eight and the son of Joseph Delap of Corrylongford ( has to be Corralongford) are James Burnside's Grandson's so that is why they were included as the other two lives on the lease in 1803.  Note also James Beatty is listed on the 1774  lease with James Burnside and  then in 1818 a James Beatty took out a lease for a William Burnside who is listed as aged about 18 the eldest son of Thomas and Lidia Burnside of Corlough and Joseph Orr aged about 18 ( but age is off by five years he actually would have been only 13 by baptism record) the eldest son of Joseph and Jane Orr of Carrickapolin . Also note that in the 1825 Lease of Ervey by Joseph Orr he gave Joseph Orr, Jr.'s age as about 18 actually he was age 20 by baptism records, Henry was listed as about age 14 by baptism record age 18 and John listed as about 13 would have been closer to 16 by the baptism records.  But Ervey is where Joseph Orr, Jr.  and Mary Ann Burnside where living before leaving Ireland according to the information that Henry put on his genealogy and their children were born there that is the ones born in Ireland. And Henry son of John William Orr and Eleanor Edith Wilson did not know anything about where Joseph and Mary Ann had gone to from Ireland. Also Henry Orr baptized 1807 was living at Ervey when he made out his will.   Point to keep in mind in the 1833 tithes there is a listing for a Thomas Burnside of Corlough with 21 acres.      So If our Thomas did actually die at age 85 on the 16th of DEC 1851 as per headstone it follows that he would be the above James Burnside's eldest son. He would have been old enough to have voted in 1788 . And the James Burnside who also voted at Corlough in 1788 would have been his father.      And there is just something wrong with Lilly's age at death on the headstone. Because this could not even have been Thomas Burnside's mother if he was born in 1766 not unless 9 years old girls were giving birth to children. I can see Lilly as being born in 1773 and dying on the 26th of January 1830 . BuT too much evidence proving she would have been younger then the death age on the headstone. Besides once more I REPEAT  the headstone clearly states THEIR DAUGHTER which I believe is the case from all evidence I have seen.  That aged 73 was meant to have shown that she had been born in 1773 not that she was aged 73 at death as so engraved on the headstone. I cannot see someone else getting credit for being the mother of Margaret Burnside Orr born in 1820 or 1821 depending on when her actual birth month fell. Nor can I see a woman giving birth to a daughter when she is 63 or 64 years of age.      Joseph Orr leased out part of his land at Carrickapolin in 1827 for his life and the two second sons both named James of James and Eliza Burnside, their son James aged about 12 and Thomas and Lydia Burnside's son James aged about 14 . This James very well could have been Thomas Burnside's younger brother James since they are both listed as from Corlough.  It very well could have been that Lydia /Lidia  had more then one given name as my grandfather's generation were given three given names or that she was just called Lilly by family.      Gail