Morning all, A small update to my posting the other day, as well as a clarification. I neglected to tab correctly the specific entry for Susan M RUNKEL. She was not married to Unnamed FAY, she was the second wife of George H FAY. Consequently those persons who are listed as generation 4 under her, are her children. I should also stress, that the line is by no means complete or written in granite. The line is complete as of the 1880 Ohio census.Some of these people relocated elsewhere, which is info I do not access to here locally, so far as I know. Linda:I'll send you the fixed listing for posting. The spouse being in the wrong column is a major error as I'm looking at the chart. Enjoy, Jim SHREVE Sr. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Shreve Sr." <gemon_hammersmythe@ameritech.net> To: <FAY-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 4:44 PM Subject: [FAY] Benejah F FAY descendents.(OPF 95) Sturbridge, MA to NY to Parma, OH related names and places on top of message > RELATED SURNAMES: LOVEJOY,HUMPHREY,VALENTINE,ROBERTS,DEAN > RELATED AREAS:Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, California, Illinois <SNIPPED THE FAMILY LINE> > 3. George H FAY (b.17 Sep 1844-Wheatland > Township,KC,Wi;d.Aft 1892) > sp: Caroline S WILCOX (m.19 Apr 1869;d.13 Oct > 1874) > 4. Carrie E FAY (d.Aft 1892) > 4. Ellis M FAY (d.Aft 1892) > 4. Unnamed FAY sp: Susan M RUNKEL (b.29 Jan 857-BT,Wi;m.18 Oct 1879;d.Aft 1892)