>X-Message: #7 >Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:16:10 +0000 >From: STANLEY HARRIS <BULL426@worldnet.att.net> >To: Family_Bibles-L@rootsweb.com >Message-ID: <36FDF35A.2328@worldnet.att.net> >Subject: commericial spam >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Continued commericial spam and from the same annoying person >should result in that person being baned from the list. >This way the list will lose only one person. As it is I will >send one more message consisting of one word UNSUBSCRIBE > Since Mr. Harris has UNSUBSCRIBED, there should be no further problems. For the rest of the readers, I have this question, why should one person feel that his interests should be imposed on the rest of us? What is his authority to tell us what we should or should not be allowed to receive? Lastly, I have been told that _ spam_ was a term used to refer to direct mass mailings to individuals - basically junk mail. Perhaps either Mr. Harris is more of a novice than he would have us realize. (Or perhaps I am.) Judith Van Voorhis