She is already linked to the marriage of her father and birth mother. If you link her again, but to the marriage of her father and stepmother, she should print out as one of the children. She could remain linked to both sets of parents. She would be linked to her father twice, but to each mother. At 09:59 PM 6/9/01 -0400, David E. Cann wrote: >Alfred, > >The general consensus so far seems to agree with you, and with hindsight, I >am wishing now that I had printed a book of descendants of "the old >warlord" in Wales in 1302, rather than my wife and her ancestors. She has >really worked hard, though, getting all of this information before the >reunion tomorrow, and the book looks nice with "Ancestors of. . . . . . . . >" at the top of the page. > >I am still holding out against hope that one of the "resident experts" on >this list can come up with a way of doing it with an Ancestor Book, but it >does not look hopeful at this point. It would be an interesting option for >version 11, though (Bruce, are ya' listenin'???), IMHO. Unless that >happens, I will begin printing a "Descendants of" book of the ol' Welch >warlord soon, since the reunion is tomorrow and I am too stubborn to modify >my genealogy to read something that is not correct <g>. > >David > >*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > >On 06/09/2001, at 7:02 PM, Alfred Eller wrote: > > >I have noted this too. If you do a descendant list she will show up, but > >there is no way, at present, to get half siblings to show up on an >ancestor > >list. > > ><snip> > >MSgt David E. Cann, USMC (Ret'd) >Phone: 540-372-7868 >Fax: 540-372-7707 >E-mail: decann@infi.net >Family home page: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~decann