Such a Census Return would be cited four times: By whole record for relationship to head; By Birth Event for birthplace; By Census Event for age; By Occupation Attribute for occupation; And each Citation has a separate assessment for that particular data. Regards, Mike Tate Sent from my Hudl Paul via <family-historian-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: >Though largely agreeing with Colin Thompson, I have no use at all for the >GEDCOM "quality" measures - they conflate a whole series of assessments into >a single "citation" measure. > >Firstly, one should be able to grade individual *sources*. > >Secondly, each citation (for one event) may cover a number of detail items >(e.g. in a census return relationship to Head, age, birthplace, occupation), >some of which are more trustworthy than others. > >As with risk assessments, a full picture has to take account of every level. > >In general we don't do genealogy assessment that way. It's almost always >much more subjective, so why make a rod for our backs? > > > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message