I used to show, say, 'Find my Past - Parish Records' as the source for entries. Now I am finding that I can get the actual detail of the marriage as a .pdf which I could attach to the citation. However, I would need each citation to be a separate entry in order to attach an image to it. My question is that would mean about 3000 individual entries in my case. Is this normal/average? or excessive? Jeremy truffle@cix.co.uk

Do you mean each marriage has a separate source record? With the .PDF attached to the source record? If so that's what many of us do and it's generally thought to be the easiest way of attaching stuff. So no, I wouldn't consider that many source records to be at all exceed. A bit on the low side by my standards! Don't worry about having many source records any more than you worry about having many individuals. The filtering abilities of FH are such that it's easy to find what you want, providing you used sensible names. On 1 Jan 2016 1:08 pm, "Jeremy via" <family-historian-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > I used to show, say, 'Find my Past - Parish Records' as the source for > entries. Now I am finding that I can get the actual detail of the > marriage as a .pdf which I could attach to the citation. However, I would > need each citation to be a separate entry in order to attach an image to > it. My question is that would mean about 3000 individual entries in my > case. Is this normal/average? or excessive? > > Jeremy > truffle@cix.co.uk > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >