KAS Duncalf was the daughter of J Silvester and S Duncalf. The child was registered in the March quarter of 1844 and baptised in May 1844. The couple actually married in January 1844, but as both surnames are given in the baptism registers and she is registered as KAS Duncalf she must have been illegitimate. How do I show this? Can I put J Silvester in twice both as a putative father and part of an unmarried couple, and as a husband after the marriage? I realise that I could mark KAS as being illegitimate, but at the same time her parents will show up as being married. Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk
Hi Anne, Don't know about entering it, but is it possible that the mother kept her maiden name after marriage, for whatever reason? Just a thought Graham > -----Original Message----- > From: family-historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:family- > historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Anne Cole > Sent: 07 November 2011 19:54 > To: family-historian-users@rootsweb.com > Subject: [FHU] Illegimacy problem with a difference > > KAS Duncalf was the daughter of J Silvester and S Duncalf. The child > was > registered in the March quarter of 1844 and baptised in May 1844. The > couple > actually married in January 1844, but as both surnames are given in the > baptism registers and she is registered as KAS Duncalf she must have > been > illegitimate. How do I show this? Can I put J Silvester in twice both > as a > putative father and part of an unmarried couple, and as a husband after > the > marriage? I realise that I could mark KAS as being illegitimate, but at > the > same time her parents will show up as being married. > > Anne > > Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society > > Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 > > http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html > > Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index > > http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ > > Lincolnshire Family History Society > > http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FAMILY-HISTORIAN- > USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.920 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4000 - Release Date: > 11/07/11 07:35:00 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.920 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4000 - Release Date: 11/07/11 07:35:00
No, it is definitely a case of illegitimacy, although she does appear with Silvester as her surname in 1851. By 1851 Sarah the mother was dead, and Sarah's sister Hannah was living in as housekeeper! Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: family-historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:family- > historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Graham Anstey > Sent: 07 November 2011 20:38 > To: family-historian-users@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [FHU] Illegimacy problem with a difference > > Hi Anne, > > Don't know about entering it, but is it possible that the mother kept her > maiden name after marriage, for whatever reason? > > Just a thought > Graham > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: family-historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:family- > > historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Anne Cole > > Sent: 07 November 2011 19:54 > > To: family-historian-users@rootsweb.com > > Subject: [FHU] Illegimacy problem with a difference > > > > KAS Duncalf was the daughter of J Silvester and S Duncalf. The child > > was > > registered in the March quarter of 1844 and baptised in May 1844. The > > couple > > actually married in January 1844, but as both surnames are given in the > > baptism registers and she is registered as KAS Duncalf she must have > > been > > illegitimate. How do I show this? Can I put J Silvester in twice both > > as a > > putative father and part of an unmarried couple, and as a husband after > > the > > marriage? I realise that I could mark KAS as being illegitimate, but at > > the > > same time her parents will show up as being married. > > > > Anne > > > > Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society > > > > Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 > > > > http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html > > > > Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index > > > > http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ > > > > Lincolnshire Family History Society > > > > http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FAMILY-HISTORIAN- > > USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 9.0.920 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4000 - Release Date: > > 11/07/11 07:35:00 > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.920 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4000 - Release Date: 11/07/11 > 07:35:00 > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FAMILY-HISTORIAN- > USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message