For what it's worth, I _would_ treat each line in an image as a source in its own right. For me, the decision about what level to pitch the source record at, is always about how much detail I put into the note for a source record. That's where I record the logic of why I think that the "John Smith", tailor of Alsager in 1766 (say) is my John Smith. For one of these images, that's liable to be several sentences. If I were to treat all the Apprentices stuff as one source, I would either put all that logic for _everyone_ into the Note for the one source, or I'd have to put the logic for each person into the citation for that person's fact - e.g. it goes into the citation against the master's occupation fact, and into the citation against the master's residence fact. And maybe the same logic goes into the same pair of facts for the apprentice if he were also of interest. That's 4 copies, maybe... So - I'd either have a very long note that I have to wade through to find the logic if I wanted to re-check that logic for one person, or I'd have the logic repeated in maybe 2 or more places. The last is a nightmare if I want to update it. Neither of these 2 options is nice for me, so I'd treat each line in an Apprentice image as a source in its own right. Other reasons to do it like that are that the Ancestry collection covers a lot of TNA references and these references (together with the page(?) number) are the only way you can really communicate to anyone else with certainty what you're looking at, so to go upwards, as it were, in the opposite direction, away from those TNA pieces references and just to having IR 1 as the reference seems perverse. I'd rather have one source per line and put the one full TNA reference plus page or folio and line number against the source - rather than a whole list to get confused among. I'd give each source a name something like: "Register Apprentice Duty: John Doe to Richard Roe, place, year" Under the publication info, I'd put something like: "digital image of original published in 'Ancestry.com. UK, Register of Duties Paid for Apprentices' Indentures, 1710-1811 [database on-line]'" The Repository would be "Ancestry" The Identification / Call number within the Repository would read: "Class:IR 1; Piece: 71; Page 124; line 25" (I'm not sure if this should be a page or folio or what...) To get the .JPEG related to a fact, you need to select the fact; click "Show Media" button (the camera); select "Add..." and take it from there. (This assumes you haven't already linked the .JPEG to the Source. There's no point in linking the .JPEG to both Source and Fact. That's my take on things - I know others will do it differently. Adrian B