RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 1780/10000
    1. Re: [FHU] 1939 Register
    2. Beryl and Mike Tate via
    3. With IE, as with Firefox, the ref number is shown in the status bar at the bottom left. You may just have to treat each %2f as a delimiter between the numbers. The same numbers are shown in the address bar after clicking the Preview link. Regards, Mike Tate -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [FHU] 1939 Register Doesn't work with Internet Explorer or Chrome. The tooltip just says "See a free preview of this record". Ian -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [FHU] 1939 Register Yes, but as mentioned on the FHUG Forums, if you hover over the Preview link the ref number fields are shown in the status or tooltip depending on your browser. -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [FHU] 1939 Register Is it just me or have FMP removed the reference number from the record preview result? I'm sure it was there a couple of days ago because I was using it as a filter on some records as suggested by Jan Murphy. Brian --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    11/13/2015 04:45:31
    1. Re: [FHU] 1939 Register
    2. Ian Thirlwell via
    3. Doesn't work with Internet Explorer or Chrome. The tooltip just says "See a free preview of this record". Ian -----Original Message----- From: Beryl and Mike Tate via Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 8:54 PM To: family-historian-users@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [FHU] 1939 Register Yes, but as mentioned on the FHUG Forums, if you hover over the Review link the ref number fields are shown in the status or tooltip depending on your browser. -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [FHU] 1939 Register Is it just me or have FMP removed the reference number from the record preview result? I'm sure it was there a couple of days ago because I was using it as a filter on some records as suggested by Jan Murphy. Brian

    11/13/2015 03:12:22
    1. Re: [FHU] 1939 Register
    2. Beryl and Mike Tate via
    3. Yes, but as mentioned on the FHUG Forums, if you hover over the Review link the ref number fields are shown in the status or tooltip depending on your browser. -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [FHU] 1939 Register Is it just me or have FMP removed the reference number from the record preview result? I'm sure it was there a couple of days ago because I was using it as a filter on some records as suggested by Jan Murphy. Brian --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    11/13/2015 01:54:40
    1. Re: [FHU] 1939 Register
    2. Richard Hyland via
    3. I queried this with FMP on Wednesday, and they informed me that it has been removed because "it was not being used in the correct way". The reference will be available when unlocking a record. Richard Sent from my iPad. On Friday, 13 November 2015, Ian Thirlwell via < family-historian-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > I've seen the same comment on the fmp facebook page. Supposedly it is due > to > be put back. > Ian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Bottomley via > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 7:40 PM > To: FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS@rootsweb.com <javascript:;> > Subject: Re: [FHU] 1939 Register > > Is it just me or have FMP removed the reference number from the record > preview result? I’m sure it was there a couple of days ago because I was > using it as a filter on some records as suggested by Jan Murphy. > > Brian > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com <javascript:;> with the word > 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com <javascript:;> with the word > 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    11/13/2015 01:50:27
    1. Re: [FHU] 1939 Register
    2. Ian Thirlwell via
    3. I've seen the same comment on the fmp facebook page. Supposedly it is due to be put back. Ian -----Original Message----- From: Brian Bottomley via Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 7:40 PM To: FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [FHU] 1939 Register Is it just me or have FMP removed the reference number from the record preview result? I’m sure it was there a couple of days ago because I was using it as a filter on some records as suggested by Jan Murphy. Brian ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    11/13/2015 01:26:56
    1. Re: [FHU] 1939 Register
    2. Brian Bottomley via
    3. Is it just me or have FMP removed the reference number from the record preview result? I’m sure it was there a couple of days ago because I was using it as a filter on some records as suggested by Jan Murphy. Brian

    11/13/2015 12:40:18
    1. Re: [FHU] 1939 Register
    2. Jan Murphy via
    3. Here's an update from Chris Paton's blog: http://britishgenes.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/1939-national-identity-register-terms.html Apparently there are concerns about data mining. Here is what I don't understand. In the US, we are often encouraged when using a census to make note of not just our own family, but also the households on either side. Some beginner books say six households on either side -- some recommend six pages on either side. The principle is the same either way -- often there are relatives living nearby, and even if they are not related, the information is useful for those of us doing 'cluster' or "FAN club" research (FAN = Friends, Associates, Neighbors). Look on a detail page for a person's census entry on Ancestry and you'll see a line marked "Neighbors" followed by a link to display all the entries on that census page. How are we supposed to do a reasonably exhaustive search if we are discouraged from looking at the people who are close by? Find My Past is putting people in the same predicament as we are in when looking at GRO indexes. Maybe the couple in a particular index entry are the people we seek -- and maybe not. No one wants to spend money to get certificates and find out that they have the wrong people. How many people solve this problem by never ordering the certificates? While I was doing some searches, and logging which names I had found so far, I discovered that I had multiple families of interest on one register page. That gives me far more incentive to unlock one of the households and get the image for that page than just having the information for a single household revealed to me. If getting access to a digital image for a page costs 6.95 GBP and I discover that there might be seven people on that page that I want to look at, that makes the price look much more affordable -- especially compared with the cost of 42 GBP that one had to pay before. Jan Murphy packrat74@gmail.com On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Beryl and Mike Tate via < family-historian-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Yes, but as mentioned on the FHUG Forums, if you hover over the Review link > the ref number fields are shown in the status or tooltip depending on your > browser. > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: Re: [FHU] 1939 Register > > Is it just me or have FMP removed the reference number from the record > preview result? I'm sure it was there a couple of days ago because I was > using it as a filter on some records as suggested by Jan Murphy. > > Brian > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    11/13/2015 06:19:42
    1. Re: [FHU] Media Linking on New Computer (Mac/Parallels)
    2. Beryl & Mike Tate via
    3. I am not sure what you are doing, but my FH V6 works just like FH V5 in all respects including files outside the Media folder. Are you sure you are using 'Re-Map > Re-map to Other Location' as you would on FH V5? Have you updated to FH V6 on your PC as suggested, in order to compare with Mac/Parallels? If you click the Help button it explains what Refresh does (and the other buttons, etc)! Can you edit a Media record Property Box so that its Linked File path refers to a file outside the Media folder? Also the Family Historian Projects folder can be located anywhere, providing you change the 'File > Project Window > Location' to match. (I know it may not suit you, but I did advise how to arrange your folder names so that file names will not be too long.) Regards, Mike Tate -----Original Message----- From: family-historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:family-historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Harris via Sent: 13 November 2015 01:43 To: FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS Subject: [FHU] Media Linking on New Computer (Mac/Parallels) Mike, not sure where to go from here with linking media on the new Mac with Parallels. After a lot of experimenting, I have found that it really only works is to put the FH Projects folder back under the Documents folder and not just stored on it’s own on the hard drive. But then it only links media when stored in the FH Media folder, not outside the Media folder. Surely this is a bug in Family Historian 6? It’s completely unacceptable to use the Media folder as half my media can’t be stored there due to the Path and file names being too long. My old FH Vers 5 worked perfectly linking files outside the Media folder, although that was on a PC, not a Mac. Also, not sure what the Refresh button under the External File Links dialogue box is supposed to do, as it doesn’t appear to refresh anything. Having just purchased this new version of FH, it’s a rather expensive white elephant. Any suggestions are most welcome. Regards, Harris > Message: 1 > Subject: Re: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer > > You should be able the Re-Map folders in bulk. > Compare FH on Windows PC with FH on Mac/Parallels/Windows by performing similar Re-Map operations to determine if the PC is behaving differently to the Mac.. > > Initially select just one folder in the 'External File Links' dialogue. > However, a folder of that name must actually exist in your filing system. > Then use 'Re-Map > Re-map to Other Location' and select the parent folder of the folder with that name in your filing system. > In other words the 'Re-Map' is mapping one existing File Links folder onto its existing parent folder. > > In order to get matching folder names you may need to Rename folders in your filing system. > > Once you are successful with one folder at a time, and if there are several sibling folders at the same level that need to 'Re-Map', then select those sibling folders and 'Re-Map' them to their parent folder. However, as before, all those sibling folders must actually exist in your filing system. > > Regards, Mike Tate > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer > > Mike, I?m still having diabolicle trouble trying to link media on the new computer. (Mac & Parallels) The only way I can link some media is to do each person separately, this can?t be correct. If I try to select the main folder that all the media is located in for a project and point it to the new location of that folder, it does nothing. (This is outside the Media folder of FH) If I try to select all the sub folders under the main folder, FH won?t allow this. I?ve read all the articles and watched the videos, but I?m obviously missing something. I?ve used FH since its second version and never had this much trouble. Surely you can point the main folder that all the media is located in to a new location without doing it a person at a time? ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    11/13/2015 05:44:24
    1. [FHU] Media Linking on New Computer (Mac/Parallels)
    2. Harris via
    3. Mike, not sure where to go from here with linking media on the new Mac with Parallels. After a lot of experimenting, I have found that it really only works is to put the FH Projects folder back under the Documents folder and not just stored on it’s own on the hard drive. But then it only links media when stored in the FH Media folder, not outside the Media folder. Surely this is a bug in Family Historian 6? It’s completely unacceptable to use the Media folder as half my media can’t be stored there due to the Path and file names being too long. My old FH Vers 5 worked perfectly linking files outside the Media folder, although that was on a PC, not a Mac. Also, not sure what the Refresh button under the External File Links dialogue box is supposed to do, as it doesn’t appear to refresh anything. Having just purchased this new version of FH, it’s a rather expensive white elephant. Any suggestions are most welcome. Regards, Harris > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:35:41 -0000 > From: "Beryl & Mike Tate" <post@tatewise.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer > To: <family-historian-users@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <002d01d11bb4$50640350$f12c09f0$@co.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > You should be able the Re-Map folders in bulk. > Compare FH on Windows PC with FH on Mac/Parallels/Windows by performing similar Re-Map operations to determine if the PC is behaving differently to the Mac.. > > Initially select just one folder in the 'External File Links' dialogue. > However, a folder of that name must actually exist in your filing system. > Then use 'Re-Map > Re-map to Other Location' and select the parent folder of the folder with that name in your filing system. > In other words the 'Re-Map' is mapping one existing File Links folder onto its existing parent folder. > > In order to get matching folder names you may need to Rename folders in your filing system. > > Once you are successful with one folder at a time, and if there are several sibling folders at the same level that need to 'Re-Map', then select those sibling folders and 'Re-Map' them to their parent folder. However, as before, all those sibling folders must actually exist in your filing system. > > Regards, Mike Tate > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer > > Mike, I?m still having diabolicle trouble trying to link media on the new computer. (Mac & Parallels) The only way I can link some media is to do each person separately, this can?t be correct. If I try to select the main folder that all the media is located in for a project and point it to the new location of that folder, it does nothing. (This is outside the Media folder of FH) If I try to select all the sub folders under the main folder, FH won?t allow this. I?ve read all the articles and watched the videos, but I?m obviously missing something. I?ve used FH since its second version and never had this much trouble. Surely you can point the main folder that all the media is located in to a new location without doing it a person at a time?

    11/13/2015 05:43:08
    1. [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer
    2. Harris via
    3. Mike, I’m still having diabolicle trouble trying to link media on the new computer. (Mac & Parallels) The only way I can link some media is to do each person separately, this can’t be correct. If I try to select the main folder that all the media is located in for a project and point it to the new location of that folder, it does nothing. (This is outside the Media folder of FH) If I try to select all the sub folders under the main folder, FH won’t allow this. I’ve read all the articles and watched the videos, but I’m obviously missing something. I’ve used FH since its second version and never had this much trouble. Surely you can point the main folder that all the media is located in to a new location without doing it a person at a time? > Harris > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 23:52:59 -0000 > From: "Beryl & Mike Tate" <post@tatewise.co.uk> > Subject: Re: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer > To: <family-historian-users@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <002601d11a80$99856f90$cc904eb0$@co.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > My first reaction is that you are not using the FH Project structure, which means that many FH features are disabled. > See http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:v4:understanding_projects > A major benefit of using the Project structure and Media sub-folder is that Media links don't get broken when migrating from computer to computer! > See http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:family_historian_migration_guide > > So I would suggest the following folder structure: > Genealogy\FH ... set this as the FH File > Project Window > Location: instead of My Documents\Family Historian Projects > Genealogy\FH\Morris ... holds the Morris.fh_proj file (renamed from Family Historian Sample Project) > Genealogy\FH\Morris\Morris.fh_data ... holds the Morris.ged file > Genealogy\FH\Morris\Morris.fh_data\Media ... holds your Media files > That path is shorter than yours so no filename truncation should be involved. > Genealogy\Family Trees\Morris Family Media > > If you stick with your current folder structure: > To correct the External File Links path, simply select the deepest 'Morris Family Media' folder, then use 'Re-Map > Re-map to Other Location' and browse to the 'Family Trees' folder, then click OK. > In other scenarios you may need to select all the folders beneath the 'Morris Family Media' folder, then use 'Re-Map'. > > If you switch to my proposed folder structure, select all the folders beneath the 'Morris Family Media' folder, then use 'Re-Map > Re-map within Project Data Folder' and select the Media folder. > > There are videos of the above techniques in the FHUG Knowledge Base. > http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:changing_external_file_links > > Regards, Mike Tate > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer > > I have the old problem of linking my media on a new computer. Old computer is a PC, new computer is a Mac running ?Parallels?. All is running fine and using the latest version of FH 6. I cannot manage to link the media using the External File Links dialog box. I do not wish to have the media in the FH Projects - Media folder as the file path is too long for some of my media and will require truncating the file names. I have the Gedcom file under a folder on the Mac?s hard drive, a folder called Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Gedcom. The media folder is under the same location - Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Media. When I remap with External File Links the path has double headings in the path name, E.g. - Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Media > Morris family Media. If I try to highlight and select all the media in the folder a dialog box says, ?Multiple selection is valid, but all the selected items must belong to the same folder?, what! d! > oes this mean? Any assistance is most welcome, could the links issue be because the FH program is running under Parallels (Windows) and the Media is stored on the hard drive of the Mac? > > Harris. > > *******************************************************

    11/10/2015 10:31:59
    1. Re: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer
    2. Beryl & Mike Tate via
    3. You should be able the Re-Map folders in bulk. Compare FH on Windows PC with FH on Mac/Parallels/Windows by performing similar Re-Map operations to determine if the PC is behaving differently to the Mac.. Initially select just one folder in the 'External File Links' dialogue. However, a folder of that name must actually exist in your filing system. Then use 'Re-Map > Re-map to Other Location' and select the parent folder of the folder with that name in your filing system. In other words the 'Re-Map' is mapping one existing File Links folder onto its existing parent folder. In order to get matching folder names you may need to Rename folders in your filing system. Once you are successful with one folder at a time, and if there are several sibling folders at the same level that need to 'Re-Map', then select those sibling folders and 'Re-Map' them to their parent folder. However, as before, all those sibling folders must actually exist in your filing system. Regards, Mike Tate -----Original Message----- Subject: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer Mike, I’m still having diabolicle trouble trying to link media on the new computer. (Mac & Parallels) The only way I can link some media is to do each person separately, this can’t be correct. If I try to select the main folder that all the media is located in for a project and point it to the new location of that folder, it does nothing. (This is outside the Media folder of FH) If I try to select all the sub folders under the main folder, FH won’t allow this. I’ve read all the articles and watched the videos, but I’m obviously missing something. I’ve used FH since its second version and never had this much trouble. Surely you can point the main folder that all the media is located in to a new location without doing it a person at a time? > Harris > > Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 23:52:59 -0000 > > My first reaction is that you are not using the FH Project structure, which means that many FH features are disabled. > See http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:v4:understanding_projects > A major benefit of using the Project structure and Media sub-folder is that Media links don't get broken when migrating from computer to computer! > See http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:family_historian_migration_guide > > So I would suggest the following folder structure: > Genealogy\FH ... set this as the FH File > Project Window > Location: instead of My Documents\Family Historian Projects > Genealogy\FH\Morris ... holds the Morris.fh_proj file (renamed from Family Historian Sample Project) > Genealogy\FH\Morris\Morris.fh_data ... holds the Morris.ged file > Genealogy\FH\Morris\Morris.fh_data\Media ... holds your Media files > That path is shorter than yours so no filename truncation should be involved. > Genealogy\Family Trees\Morris Family Media > > If you stick with your current folder structure: > To correct the External File Links path, simply select the deepest 'Morris Family Media' folder, then use 'Re-Map > Re-map to Other Location' and browse to the 'Family Trees' folder, then click OK. > In other scenarios you may need to select all the folders beneath the 'Morris Family Media' folder, then use 'Re-Map'. > > If you switch to my proposed folder structure, select all the folders beneath the 'Morris Family Media' folder, then use 'Re-Map > Re-map within Project Data Folder' and select the Media folder. > > There are videos of the above techniques in the FHUG Knowledge Base. > http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:changing_external_file_links > > Regards, Mike Tate > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer > > I have the old problem of linking my media on a new computer. Old computer is a PC, new computer is a Mac running ?Parallels?. All is running fine and using the latest version of FH 6. I cannot manage to link the media using the External File Links dialog box. I do not wish to have the media in the FH Projects - Media folder as the file path is too long for some of my media and will require truncating the file names. I have the Gedcom file under a folder on the Mac?s hard drive, a folder called Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Gedcom. The media folder is under the same location - Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Media. When I remap with External File Links the path has double headings in the path name, E.g. - Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Media > Morris family Media. If I try to highlight and select all the media in the folder a dialog box says, ?Multiple selection is valid, but all the selected items must belong to the same folder?, what! d! > oes this mean? Any assistance is most welcome, could the links issue be because the FH program is running under Parallels (Windows) and the Media is stored on the hard drive of the Mac? > > Harris.

    11/10/2015 05:35:41
    1. [FHU] registering deaths on 1939 register
    2. Jacqueline Roberts via
    3. re Adrian's query in Saturday, the latest /Lost Cousins /newsletter - available to anyone, I believe, put out Friday 6th Nov explains the process but it costs money (?£25?) to do it unless you subscribe to Findmypast.

    11/09/2015 05:31:10
    1. Re: [FHU] FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS Digest, Vol 10
    2. family-historian-users via
    3. Richard, I don't think you can get retrospective copies of digest emails, but you can search/browse the mailing list archive for the material you want. See http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/index/other/Software/FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS.html for details (at the bottom of the page). John -----Original Message----- From: family-historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:family-historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Richard Clark via Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 9:38 AM To: family-historian-users@rootsweb.com Subject: [FHU] FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS Digest, Vol 10 Hi Owing to the debacle concerning the digest to NTL addresses being marked as spam and having to re-apply to be put back on the digest list, I now do not have digests between 229 & 244. Is it possible to have these re-sent to me please and what process should I follow? regards ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    11/09/2015 04:10:21
    1. [FHU] FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS Digest, Vol 10
    2. Richard Clark via
    3. Hi Owing to the debacle concerning the digest to NTL addresses being marked as spam and having to re-apply to be put back on the digest list, I now do not have digests between 229 & 244. Is it possible to have these re-sent to me please and what process should I follow? regards

    11/09/2015 02:38:22
    1. [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer
    2. Harris via
    3. I have the old problem of linking my media on a new computer. Old computer is a PC, new computer is a Mac running ‘Parallels’. All is running fine and using the latest version of FH 6. I cannot manage to link the media using the External File Links dialog box. I do not wish to have the media in the FH Projects - Media folder as the file path is too long for some of my media and will require truncating the file names. I have the Gedcom file under a folder on the Mac’s hard drive, a folder called Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Gedcom. The media folder is under the same location - Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Media. When I remap with External File Links the path has double headings in the path name, E.g. - Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Media > Morris family Media. If I try to highlight and select all the media in the folder a dialog box says, “Multiple selection is valid, but all the selected items must belong to the same folder�! ��, what does this mean? Any assistance is most welcome, could the links issue be because the FH program is running under Parallels (Windows) and the Media is stored on the hard drive of the Mac? Harris.

    11/09/2015 02:32:41
    1. Re: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer
    2. Beryl & Mike Tate via
    3. My first reaction is that you are not using the FH Project structure, which means that many FH features are disabled. See http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:v4:understanding_projects A major benefit of using the Project structure and Media sub-folder is that Media links don't get broken when migrating from computer to computer! See http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:family_historian_migration_guide So I would suggest the following folder structure: Genealogy\FH ... set this as the FH File > Project Window > Location: instead of My Documents\Family Historian Projects Genealogy\FH\Morris ... holds the Morris.fh_proj file (renamed from Family Historian Sample Project) Genealogy\FH\Morris\Morris.fh_data ... holds the Morris.ged file Genealogy\FH\Morris\Morris.fh_data\Media ... holds your Media files That path is shorter than yours so no filename truncation should be involved. Genealogy\Family Trees\Morris Family Media If you stick with your current folder structure: To correct the External File Links path, simply select the deepest 'Morris Family Media' folder, then use 'Re-Map > Re-map to Other Location' and browse to the 'Family Trees' folder, then click OK. In other scenarios you may need to select all the folders beneath the 'Morris Family Media' folder, then use 'Re-Map'. If you switch to my proposed folder structure, select all the folders beneath the 'Morris Family Media' folder, then use 'Re-Map > Re-map within Project Data Folder' and select the Media folder. There are videos of the above techniques in the FHUG Knowledge Base. http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:changing_external_file_links Regards, Mike Tate -----Original Message----- Subject: [FHU] Media Linking On New Computer I have the old problem of linking my media on a new computer. Old computer is a PC, new computer is a Mac running ‘Parallels’. All is running fine and using the latest version of FH 6. I cannot manage to link the media using the External File Links dialog box. I do not wish to have the media in the FH Projects - Media folder as the file path is too long for some of my media and will require truncating the file names. I have the Gedcom file under a folder on the Mac’s hard drive, a folder called Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Gedcom. The media folder is under the same location - Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Media. When I remap with External File Links the path has double headings in the path name, E.g. - Genealogy > Family Trees > Morris Family Media > Morris family Media. If I try to highlight and select all the media in the folder a dialog box says, “Multiple selection is valid, but all the selected items must belong to the same folder�! ��, what does this mean? Any assistance is most welcome, could the links issue be because the FH program is running under Parallels (Windows) and the Media is stored on the hard drive of the Mac? Harris. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    11/08/2015 04:52:59
    1. Re: [FHU] National Archives
    2. Alan via
    3. Hi Thanks all for the help. All sorted now - it's a pity National Archives couldn't have put me on the right track first off. Thanks again Alan -----Original Message----- From: Beryl & Mike Tate via Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 3:22 PM To: family-historian-users@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [FHU] National Archives Yes, as documented in the FHUG KB Research useful websites: http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=fhugdownloads:contents:service_uk_gro_certificate_ordering Regards, Mike Tate -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [FHU] National Archives Alan, You use this site: http://www.gro.gov.uk/gro/content/ not the National Archives Mervyn > On 4 Nov 2015, at 14:56, Alan via <family-historian-users@rootsweb.com> > wrote: > > Hi > Can anyone tell me how to get to National Archive site to order BMD > certificates. Haven’t done it for some time and everything has changed, > also website given, by National Archives, to me over the phone doesn’t > exist. > Cheers > Alan ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    11/08/2015 07:30:44
    1. Re: [FHU] FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS Digest, Vol 10, Issue 242
    2. Keith Jillings via
    3. On 07/11/2015 22:16, family-historian-users@rootsweb.com wrote: > Dear all, > Between 1987 and 1990 I spent a lot of time working with, what was by then > called, the NHS Register. The discussion about computerising patient > records had begun and I spent some time explaining the need for a unique > identifier and pointing out that the current NHS Numbers would not work. (I > will not give you're the technical details!). That's an interesting insight, and thank you! I was a wartime baby, and was taught my National Identity Number to recite if asked by anyone official. It was 4 letters plus 3 digits. For a while after the war, my NHS number was that NI number, which appeared on everything medical including spectacle prescriptions. I'm not sure quite when it ceased to be so. Now, I have at least five numbers for the NHS to find me: two on my NHS ID card - one UK + 8 digits, one like a very long credit card number; a separate one from the local hospital (3 letters plus 7 digits); two more for my GP surgery - one 3 + 3 + 4 digits, the other my name plus date of birth as one long word. No doubt it all works somehow. I looked at the 1939 Register: my parents are there but not the rest of the family. I didn't spend long looking for them, and didn't pay good money to see what detail there is. No doubt it will become free to view under one or another subscription, like the 1911 census ;) Keith

    11/07/2015 07:47:54
    1. Re: [FHU] Delete a box
    2. Caryl Gill via
    3. Thanks Mike - I managed to get rid of the box Caryl -----Original Message----- From: family-historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:family-historian-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Beryl & Mike Tate via Sent: 07 November 2015 22:16 To: family-historian-users@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [FHU] Delete a box Caryl, if you are describing a single parent with children then you cannot in general eliminate the blank box that represents the other parent who must have existed. If you are describing a person with no children and no spouse then use the technique in the FHUG Knowledge Base "Removing Unwanted Relations": http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:removing_unwanted_relations The single parent with child scenario is fully discussed in the FHUG posting "To not have blank or 'unknown' boxes in diagrams": http://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=6181 Regards, Mike Tate -----Original Message----- Subject: [FHU] Delete a box Hi I know this has come up before, but how do you delete an empty box from a diagram. I unlinked it from the spouse then deleted, but when I looked the empty box was still in the diagram. Thanks Caryl ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to FAMILY-HISTORIAN-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    11/07/2015 05:33:11
    1. Re: [FHU] Delete a box
    2. Beryl & Mike Tate via
    3. Caryl, if you are describing a single parent with children then you cannot in general eliminate the blank box that represents the other parent who must have existed. If you are describing a person with no children and no spouse then use the technique in the FHUG Knowledge Base "Removing Unwanted Relations": http://www.fhug.org.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=how_to:removing_unwanted_relations The single parent with child scenario is fully discussed in the FHUG posting "To not have blank or 'unknown' boxes in diagrams": http://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=6181 Regards, Mike Tate -----Original Message----- Subject: [FHU] Delete a box Hi I know this has come up before, but how do you delete an empty box from a diagram. I unlinked it from the spouse then deleted, but when I looked the empty box was still in the diagram. Thanks Caryl

    11/07/2015 03:16:05