I was concerned about the Aureate matter since CuteFTP was listed as one of those programs, but my system scanned clean. The version of CuteFTP listed as having Aureate is CuteFTP 3.0. I use CuteFTP 2.8. It does what I want and I've been using it for 3 years. Just because a software is listed on the Aureate list does not mean it will positively load Aureate on your system. That's what OptOut is for ~~ cleans your system of Aureate files. JMHO - Rene' :) >George, I think it would be of interest to note that the CuteFTP was listed >as one of the programs that had Aureate included.....WS_FTP was not.... > >Mari > >At 01:42 AM 5/31/00 -0400, George W. Durman wrote: >>If you use WS_FTP Pro, thought you might be interested in knowing that >>version 6.5 has been released. For those of you who are not web site >>owners, it might also interest you to know that WS_FTP Pro is the >>co-favorite for uploading files to web sites, the other being CuteFTP, >>although I think WS_FTP Pro has edged ahead in the past few months. >> >>If you were using the 6.5 Beta, be sure to read ALL the instructions >>before downloading and installing. >> >>Here's the blurb from WinFile.com: >> >>WS_FTP Pro 6.5 - Demo: $40.00 - 2.2 Mb >> >>WS_FTP Pro is the fastest, most powerful Windows file transfer >>client available. With WS_FTP Pro, you can connect to any FTP >>server, browse through directories and files, and transfer files in >>either direction. WS_FTP Pro's Windows Explorer Interface lets you >>copy and move files within the familiar Windows Explorer, using the >>same reliable "core engine" as the classic WS_FTP interface. >>Features include session profile support for connecting to >>frequently accessed FTP site; remote to remote file transfer; >>advanced support for handling timeouts, port numbers, passive file >>transfers, and firewalls; convenient drag-and-drop capabilities to >>simplify and speed-up your file transfer tasks, and more. Transfer >>files easily with WS_FTP Pro 6.5. >> >> >>SgtGeorge

At 07:22 PM 5/31/00 -0400, Rene' Marker wrote: >I was concerned about the Aureate matter since CuteFTP was listed as one of >those programs, but my system scanned clean. The version of CuteFTP listed >as having Aureate is CuteFTP 3.0. I use CuteFTP 2.8. It does what I want >and I've been using it for 3 years. > >Just because a software is listed on the Aureate list does not mean it will >positively load Aureate on your system. That's what OptOut is for ~~ cleans >your system of Aureate files. > >JMHO - Rene' :) I'm well aware of the difference in versions playing a part in it. It was just a "heads up" for people to check. Not a put down of the product. Mari

I know you weren't putting it down Mari (hence the smile in my sig), but a lot of people believe everything they read or hear and won't consider a program because of that. Mine was a "heads up" email as well..... Rene' :) At 06:36 PM 5/31/2000 -0500, you wrote: >At 07:22 PM 5/31/00 -0400, Rene' Marker wrote: >>I was concerned about the Aureate matter since CuteFTP was listed as one of >>those programs, but my system scanned clean. The version of CuteFTP listed >>as having Aureate is CuteFTP 3.0. I use CuteFTP 2.8. It does what I want >>and I've been using it for 3 years. >> >>Just because a software is listed on the Aureate list does not mean it will >>positively load Aureate on your system. That's what OptOut is for ~~ cleans >>your system of Aureate files. >> >>JMHO - Rene' :) > >I'm well aware of the difference in versions playing a part in it. It was >just a "heads up" for people to check. >Not a put down of the product. > >Mari > > >============================== >Search ALL of RootsWeb's mailing lists in real time. >RootsWeb's Personalized Mailing Lists: >http://pml.rootsweb.com/