Leo Estes wrote: > > 7142. JOHN M. ESTES RFD 3, Lawton, Okla... Thanks for that Leo. The ancestry of this John M Estes is actually well worked out (and no, it's not the John Minton/Moses Estes but another). The names mentioned in the article are all correct and all the people claimed to be his ancestors are .. however the relationships are a, ahh, tad mixed up. Elizabeth Hulsey was actually a generation earlier than he said. I have no idea if she was part indian or not .. I have no proof either way. The claim was rejected so I assume someone else wasn't convinced either. I have this John Estes charted, so if anyone wants to know his line, you know where to look. I'm rushed so dont have the time to copy out his ancestry here. :) cheers, David. -- ... under de-construction ('till I find something I wanna put here) DC2.D A+++! L^ Pfwl Bfl Fo R+++! Ac+ J-- S++ Fr+++! I+ H++ $ M V+++ Cag http://xenon.triode.net.au/~dragon mailto:dragon@triode.net.au