I would normally agree wholeheartedly but we must be pragmatic rather than dogmatic about it. I'd like to know of any instances where a good online photograph of the original (such as the SEAX PRs) is less helpful than the original. Keith Taylor Somerset UK -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of sylvia Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2011 7:35 PM To: Steve; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ess] APART from SEAX good news However...you should never, ever rely solely on online records. Always look at the original. Thales UK Ltd (Wells) DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. It is intended only for the stated addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, you must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this e-mail. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful. We may monitor all e-mail communications through our networks. If you have received this e-mail in error, please inform us immediately on sender's telephone number above and delete it and all copies from your system. We accept no responsibility for changes to any e-mail which occur after it has been sent. Attachments to this e-mail may contain software viruses which could damage your system. We therefore recommend you virus-check all attachments before opening. Thales UK Ltd. Registered Office: 2 Dashwood Lang Road, The Bourne Business Park, Addlestone, Weybridge, Surrey KT15 2NX Registered in England No. 868273