RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [WOR] 1911 Census
    2. Roy Stockdill
    3. On 3 Aug 2010 at 15:12, Katie de Haan wrote: > I may be under a misapprehension - though I think not - but I > understood 1911 lookups were expressly forbidden by the company > anyway. Surely by now that must be well-known by anyone tracing their > family history online. > > Enjoy the trail, > Katie > The Netherlands < Technically, you are correct, but I don't think I will be in too much trouble with FMP because I have a very good relationship with them, have undertaken commissioned research for them and sometimes give them publicity when I am writing for Practical Family History, which I do every month. I've even done a DVD interview for them which I understand will be appearing on their website at some stage. Certainly I would not breach any agreement by sending an image to another person. However, on this occasion I felt justified in citing a few facts from the 1911 census because it was vital in establishing that I had the right person, especially the number of years the couple had been married. This, coupled with my researches at FreeBMD and in the other censuses, rounded off a trail through the records to point the original enquirer in the right direction. -- Roy Stockdill Genealogical researcher, writer & lecturer Newbies' Guide to Genealogy & Family History: www.genuki.org.uk/gs/Newbie.html "There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about." OSCAR WILDE

    08/03/2010 08:25:16