----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippa Garnsey" <pgar9629@bigpond.net.au> To: <ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 2:15 PM Subject: [ENG-WIL] Private Baptism > I have two infants in my family who were recorded as being privately > baptised in the parish register. This was in 1817 in Salisbury. > > I assume that this means they were baptised in their home rather than the > parish church. They were twins so could have been premature and in danger of > dying before they could be baptised in the parish church. > > Could anyone comment on the reason for the private baptism? > > Many thanks > > Philippa Garnsey > Sydney > Hi Philippa! You've basically answered your own question correctly. However, some private baptims were held in the houses of the well-to-do rather than in the church in front of the congregation. You have coincidentally hit upon another point of interest. Whilst it is normally (and essentially correctly) assumed that 'baptism' is a synonym for 'christening', some clergymen used the latter term essentially for the church ceremony. Thus, I have encountered in parish registers entries such as 'baptised 27 May', 'christened 18 August'. In other words, if a sickly child in fact survived, there was sometimes a full church service later, which might be termed 'christening' though, of course, the child would not be baptised twice. Best wishes Paul

Also, some of the gentry and aspiring gentry preferred privacy. In the larger parishes, and especially on Christmas Day, there were multiple baptisms done on the same day. It would be unseemly for some of the squirarchy to be having their baptisms viewed by the hoi polloi. Jeff On Sun, 9 July, 2006 4:31 am, daphne.guthrie wrote: > Yes private baptisms could be due to a child being sickly, and perhaps > not expected to live. Private also can mean that they were baptised > outside of a normal c.hurch service. Hope this helps. regards daphne > daphne.guthrie@xtra.co.nz Researching areas: Medway, > Kent;Wiltshire;Hampshire:Dorset; Sussex;Essex & > Norfolk England. Fyfe Scotland > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Philippa Garnsey" <pgar9629@bigpond.net.au> > To: <ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 1:15 AM > Subject: [ENG-WIL] Private Baptism > > > >> I have two infants in my family who were recorded as being privately >> baptised in the parish register. This was in 1817 in Salisbury. >> >> I assume that this means they were baptised in their home rather than >> the parish church. They were twins so could have been premature and in >> danger of dying before they could be baptised in the parish church. >> >> Could anyone comment on the reason for the private baptism? >> >> >> Many thanks >> >> >> Philippa Garnsey >> Sydney >> >> >> >> ==== ENG-WILTSHIRE Mailing List ==== >> Virus information: http://helpdesk.rootsweb.com/announce.html#virus >> Mailing lists: >> http://www.rootsweb.com/~jfuller/gen_mail_country-unk.html >> or http://www.genuki.org.uk/indexes/MailingLists.html >> >> ============================== >> New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your >> ancestors at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. >> Learn more: >> http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=1459 >> 9&targetid=5429 >> >> >> > > > > ==== ENG-WILTSHIRE Mailing List ==== > 1881 census, IGI (free): http://www.familysearch.org > 1901 census (free to search, pay to view): > www.1901census.nationalarchives.gov.uk A2A database: http://www.a2a.org.uk > Free BMD Project: http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/ > > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. Learn > more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > > >

Hi, Just to let you know, I'm Suze, and I'm in Canada. Did you maybe sent this to the wrong address or maybe you forwarded it to all. Suze "daphne.guthrie" <daphne.guthrie@xtra.co.nz> wrote: Yes private baptisms could be due to a child being sickly, and perhaps not expected to live. Private also can mean that they were baptised outside of a normal church service. Hope this helps. regards daphne daphne.guthrie@xtra.co.nz Researching areas: Medway, Kent;Wiltshire;Hampshire:Dorset; Sussex;Essex & Norfolk England. Fyfe Scotland ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippa Garnsey" To: Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 1:15 AM Subject: [ENG-WIL] Private Baptism >I have two infants in my family who were recorded as being privately > baptised in the parish register. This was in 1817 in Salisbury. > > I assume that this means they were baptised in their home rather than the > parish church. They were twins so could have been premature and in danger > of > dying before they could be baptised in the parish church. > > Could anyone comment on the reason for the private baptism? > > Many thanks > > Philippa Garnsey > Sydney > > > ==== ENG-WILTSHIRE Mailing List ==== > Virus information: http://helpdesk.rootsweb.com/announce.html#virus > Mailing lists: http://www.rootsweb.com/~jfuller/gen_mail_country-unk.html > or http://www.genuki.org.uk/indexes/MailingLists.html > > ============================== > New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your ancestors > at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. Learn more: > http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429 > > ==== ENG-WILTSHIRE Mailing List ==== 1881 census, IGI (free): http://www.familysearch.org 1901 census (free to search, pay to view): www.1901census.nationalarchives.gov.uk A2A database: http://www.a2a.org.uk Free BMD Project: http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/ ============================== Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx

I have two infants in my family who were recorded as being privately baptised in the parish register. This was in 1817 in Salisbury. I assume that this means they were baptised in their home rather than the parish church. They were twins so could have been premature and in danger of dying before they could be baptised in the parish church. Could anyone comment on the reason for the private baptism? Many thanks Philippa Garnsey Sydney

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/EUC.2ACI/3077.1.1.1.1.1.1.2 Message Board Post: Brian, I found Williams father Robert Wody. His will says He died in 1814. I'm trying to get back from there. Regards Lois

Hi Janice, I am descended from the CHAMBERS family in Warminster, Wiltshire. George CHAMBERS, from Langham, in Rutland, married Amey COLLINS in Marshfield, Gloucestershire, in 1823. They baptised three children in Shepton Mallet, Somerset, and were in Warminster by 1835, where several more children were baptised. George kept the Organ tavern, while his son George became a watch and clock maker. Humphrey CHAMBERS, the youngest son of George & Amey, moved to Birmingham and is my great-grandfather. Do you see any connection with this family, about whom I have a fair bit of information? Elizabeth Elizabeth Duke Dunedin New Zealand ----- Original Message ----- From: "janice lutz" <jnybltz@msn.com> To: <ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 9:20 AM Subject: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > I hope I am doing this correctly, if not please let me know how to post to this site. > I am researching the following names in Wiltshire: CHAMBERS, WHITE, UNDERHILL, TOWNSEND, BARNES, MARCHANT AND CHANT. Does anyone have ties to these names? Janice > <snip>

Sarah NASH and MACEY are names well known in the FROME area of Somerset. COLEFORD and CLOFORD are villages near Frome. See: www.fromeresearch.org.uk or http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Frome/ Jim http://www.payman.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk sarah curtis <sarah@scurtis.wanadoo.co.uk> wrote: Hi, l have posted this message before and am reposting in the hope of finding the baptism of my elusive George. My 3rd ggrandfather George NASH was born c1821(he joined the army in Sep 1839 and gave his age as 17 1/2) he also stated that he was born in Codford? but dispite a thorough search of the PR's for Codford and the surrounding areas l have failed to find a baptism record for George? I am almost certain that his parents names are James & Charity nee MACEY, George states his fathers name on his wedding cert and he named his first daughter Diana Charity, an unusual name and putting that with the fact that James & Charity are baptising children around the time of Georges birth date! I know that both James & Charity lived in the Wylye valley area but they also baptised one of there sons in Romsey, Hants. If anyone could suggest another avenue to explore or has any further info l would be extremely grateful. Kind Regards Robert ==== ENG-WILTSHIRE Mailing List ==== Except for personal messages, please post replies to the list. Other people can learn from them! Remember to check that you have completed the subject line and that it is relevent to your query. ============================== Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx --------------------------------- Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 7p a photo.

It's even further than 30 KM - it's 38.5 miles. Val ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eliz Hanebury" <edhanebury@zoominternet.net> To: <ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 11:34 AM Subject: Re: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > I will have to see <G> a fair bit north and west of Salisbury <G> but I > haven't a clue how far - possibly 30 KM > > Eliz > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "janice lutz" <jnybltz@msn.com> > To: <ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 3:39 PM > Subject: Re: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > > > | My Barnes family is from Fisherton Anger, is that anywhere near your > Malmesbury? Janice > | ----- Original Message ----- > | From: Eliz Hanebury<mailto:edhanebury@zoominternet.net> > | To: ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com<mailto:ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > | Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 6:29 PM > | Subject: Re: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > | > | > | I have Barnes connections, they were from Malmesbury > | > | > | Eliz > | ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "janice lutz" <jnybltz@msn.com<mailto:jnybltz@msn.com>> > | To: <ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com<mailto:ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com>> > | Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 5:20 PM > | Subject: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > | > | > | |I hope I am doing this correctly, if not please let me know how to post > to > | this site. > | | I am researching the following names in Wiltshire: CHAMBERS, WHITE, > | UNDERHILL, TOWNSEND, BARNES, MARCHANT AND CHANT. Does anyone have ties > to > | these names? Janice > | | > | | > > > ==== ENG-WILTSHIRE Mailing List ==== > Use the link within a GATEWAYED message to reply. Message board users are rarely subscribed to the list. > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.9/382 - Release Date: 4/07/06 > >

Hello Patsy. Thank you. I never thought of PYKE!! Will look a bit further into that and see if Henry is one of ours (PIKE) who changed his name for some reason but I am dubous he is connected. I must see if there is a marriage in Great Somerford or Startley!! Anyone able to help please? Thanks again. Mike > Hi Mike - there is a PYKE family with these names in Great Somerford in > 1861. Children listed as born Startley. Still there in 1871 - parents Henry > and Charlotte. Henry PYKE may have married Charlotte PORTER 1847 registered > Malmesbury. > Hope that helps. > Cheers, Patsy - New Zealand. > > > There are a number of PIKEs, the mother of whom had the maiden name of > > PORTER:- John (1852); Jonas (1854); Caroline (1856); George (1859); Fanny M > > (1861); Lucy A (1863); Elizabeth (1866) and Kate (1868). > >

Thank you Nancy for your advice and information, it is very much appreciated Marlene. --------------------------------- All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine

Hi Mike - there is a PYKE family with these names in Great Somerford in 1861. Children listed as born Startley. Still there in 1871 - parents Henry and Charlotte. Henry PYKE may have married Charlotte PORTER 1847 registered Malmesbury. Hope that helps. Cheers, Patsy - New Zealand. > Hello fellow researchers of Wiltshire families. > > The Wiltshire BMD site has included a lot more Chippenham held births. > > There are a number of PIKEs, the mother of whom had the maiden name of > PORTER:- John (1852); Jonas (1854); Caroline (1856); George (1859); Fanny > M > (1861); Lucy A (1863); Elizabeth (1866) and Kate (1868). > > Can anyone find any members of this family in any census? I can't!! I > don't > know if I am having senior moments ......... > > I have also tried to find a PIKE and PORTER marriage but cannot find one > of > these either!! > > Is anyone related to this family or can help in any way? I will be most > grateful for any help. > > Thanks. > > Mike

Hello fellow researchers of Wiltshire families. The Wiltshire BMD site has included a lot more Chippenham held births. There are a number of PIKEs, the mother of whom had the maiden name of PORTER:- John (1852); Jonas (1854); Caroline (1856); George (1859); Fanny M (1861); Lucy A (1863); Elizabeth (1866) and Kate (1868). Can anyone find any members of this family in any census? I can't!! I don't know if I am having senior moments ......... I have also tried to find a PIKE and PORTER marriage but cannot find one of these either!! Is anyone related to this family or can help in any way? I will be most grateful for any help. Thanks. Mike

This seems the time to see if descendant-connections can be made, and a "brick wall" named Ruth chipped at. Please excuse the length -- if of no interest, please skip it all -- though I'd love some thoughts! All places mentioned, in two counties, are 2 to maybe 15 miles apart, all very close to one another. William Coulman (COLEMAN) and Ruth OFFER were married 23 April 1798 Chippenham, Wiltshire. William was b. April 1775 Hardenhuish (Harnish), now a part of Chippenham, and d. April 1855 Biddestone, Wiltshire. Ruth was b. ?? and d. at the age of 48 in February 1814 in Biddestone, making her b. ca. 1765-66. If that's accurate, she would have been about 10 years older than William, which seems unlikely for the time unless married previously. I have copies of all of the original parish/probate records about all information here, which give no indication of Ruth's status, such as "widow." Scanty info re. any Ruth OFFER in the IGI is not applicable or of questionable validity/use at present. Ruth and William had five known children: Dinah (christened 1799), Robert (1802), William (1804), George (1807) and Philip (1811, d. 1887), my 3X great-grandfather. If Ruth were born ca. 1765, she would have been ca. 34 when Dinah was born and 45 when Philip was, entirely possible but it raises questions. There is more: A 1782-written, 1783-probated will of a Martha OFFER of Frampton Cotterell, Gloucestershire, (the widow and relict of William OFFER of FC -- will 1755, probate 1757) mentions many relatives/heirs, including Ruth ??, the widow of Martha's deceased son, James, whom his father's will says is eldest of three sons. This Ruth OFFER and deceased James had three children (James, Hannah and Mary, all identified/named in will) and, after James died, under the recorded name of "Ruth OFFER" she married Thomas DAVIS at FC in 1779. Martha in her will also mentions an apparent unmarried granddaughter, Ruth OFFER, the daughter of her only living son, Robert OFFER, who appears to live in nearby Westerleigh, Gloucestershire. His children "then living" if any, but otherwise unnamed aside from Ruth, were given a pound and a shilling, and she also was given half of her grandmother's clothing. Martha was careful to identify all women who were married at the time of the will's signing and their husbands. So this granddaughter appears to be unmarried, perhaps a minor but maybe older in 1782 and still living at home, or perhaps could have been in service or other work in Chippenham or thereabouts some 15 miles away. The question: Would parish records usually/always be recorded under the previous husband's surname, as in the widow Ruth who married Thomas Davis, or would they sometimes be recorded under the birth surname? If the current name at the marriage she could not in 1798 be the wife of William Coulman (COLEMAN) as her name would have been recorded as Ruth DAVIS, but the granddaughter Ruth OFFER might be. It should be noted there is a Ruth OFFER who d. 1849 at Coalpit Heath (between FC and Westerleigh) at the age of 77 (b. ca. 1772), who might (and might not) be Robert's unmarried daughter -- the granddaughter Martha left clothes to in her will and who would have been ca. 10 when the will was written if this is she. Or should another Ruth be sought? Or??? Incidentally, after Ruth OFFER COLEMAN's death, William married Mary RALPH 17 October 1816 in Biddestone and had three known (possibly more) children: James (christened 1820), Maria (1824) and John (1828), all b. Biddestone. Mary was the daughter of James RALPH and Elizabeth LEWIS, b. 1788 Yatton Keynall. William and Mary RALPH COLEMAN are found in the 1851 census in Biddestone. Any suggestions, thoughts, ideas, etc. gratefully accepted as would be distant cousins or step-cousins! -- Sally

Hello Bonnie - if you don't have the 1841 census reference: St Mary Magdalen, Bermondsey 7 Totford Place, Deckinger? Road Charles STEWART 20 Wool stapler Mary Ann 20 Ann 2 George 1 month All except George listed as not born in county. There is a William NASH aged 65 Labourer, living in Wilton (Mary Ann's birthplace?) in 1841 with daughters Caroline 20 and Susannah 15. Appears to be widowed although mhas a wife Mary in 1851. His birthplace listed as Ditchampton. According to IGI Caroline and Susannah are the daughters of William and Mary NASH. There are STUART/STEWARTs in Hampshire but could not see a likely George. IGI has a George and Ann STUART baptising several children in the timeframe but no Charles. Hope this adds a little - apologies if you have all this already. Cheers, Patsy - New Zealand. > Hello All, > > It has been a few years since I have subscribed and posted on this list, > but have new information to add. My GG Grandfather, Charles Stuart is > found living with his family in the 1851 Census for Trowbridge, Wiltshire: > > 1840 549 010 Mortimer St Stuart Charles hd m 33 Wool Stapler HAM > Southampton > 1840 549 010 Mortimer St Stuart Mary Ann WI M 34 Dress Maker WIL Wil > 1840 549 010 Motimer St Stuart Ann DA U 12 Scholar WIL Wilton > 1840 549 010 Mortimer St Stuart George SO U 9 Scholar LND > 1840 549 010 Mortimer St Stuart Charles SO 7 Scholar MDX Hounslow > > We now have a marriage certificate for Charles & Mary Ann and now know > that Mary Ann's maiden name was Nash, daughter of William Nash, Occupation > Laborer, and Charles' fathers name was George Stewart, occupation > woolsorter. The witnesses are Sarah Stewart, relationship unknown and a > George David or Davidson, again relationship if any unknown. The other 2 > names are illegible. They were married in the Parish of Fisherton Anger, > Wiltshire, February 14, 1838. Mary Ann Nash Stuart latter married > Nathaniel Bamford in Wilshire and later moved to Gloucestershire. My GG > Grandfather Charles married Jane Berryman and immigrated to the United > States in 1883, his sister Ann married Alfred Fuller and according to our > family history, his brother George and family immigrated to New Zealand. > We always thought their last name was spelled STUART, but now that we have > a marriage certificate they spelled it STEWART, so must have used the > spelling interchangeably. Can anybody connect to this family or have any > information? Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Thank You > Bonnie James > North Platte, NE > USA

Hi, l have posted this message before and am reposting in the hope of finding the baptism of my elusive George. My 3rd ggrandfather George NASH was born c1821(he joined the army in Sep 1839 and gave his age as 17 1/2) he also stated that he was born in Codford? but dispite a thorough search of the PR's for Codford and the surrounding areas l have failed to find a baptism record for George? I am almost certain that his parents names are James & Charity nee MACEY, George states his fathers name on his wedding cert and he named his first daughter Diana Charity, an unusual name and putting that with the fact that James & Charity are baptising children around the time of Georges birth date! I know that both James & Charity lived in the Wylye valley area but they also baptised one of there sons in Romsey, Hants. If anyone could suggest another avenue to explore or has any further info l would be extremely grateful. Kind Regards Robert

I am descended from Mary BARNES 1804 Alderbury, just SE of Salisbury. Does this ring any bells for anyone anywhere? shalom Chris Christopher Ridings cnridings@exemail.com.au > > > From: "Eliz Hanebury" <edhanebury@zoominternet.net> > Date: 7 July 2006 11:34:03 AM > To: ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > > > I will have to see <G> a fair bit north and west of Salisbury <G> > but I > haven't a clue how far - possibly 30 KM > > Eliz > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "janice lutz" <jnybltz@msn.com> > To: <ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 3:39 PM > Subject: Re: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > > > | My Barnes family is from Fisherton Anger, is that anywhere near your > Malmesbury? Janice > | ----- Original Message ----- > | From: Eliz Hanebury<mailto:edhanebury@zoominternet.net> > | To: ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com<mailto:ENG-WILTSHIRE- > L@rootsweb.com> > | Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 6:29 PM > | Subject: Re: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > | > | > | I have Barnes connections, they were from Malmesbury > | > | > | Eliz > | ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "janice lutz" <jnybltz@msn.com<mailto:jnybltz@msn.com>> > | To: <ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com<mailto:ENG-WILTSHIRE- > L@rootsweb.com>> > | Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 5:20 PM > | Subject: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > | > | > | |I hope I am doing this correctly, if not please let me know how > to post > to > | this site. > | | I am researching the following names in Wiltshire: CHAMBERS, > WHITE, > | UNDERHILL, TOWNSEND, BARNES, MARCHANT AND CHANT. Does anyone > have ties > to > | these names? Janice > >

Hi List, Old photographs have come to light of my GGrandparents from Wiltshire no dates they were taken by L Porter 42,New Road Chippenham would anyone know what dates this Photograph Studio was trading , Thank You Marlene. --------------------------------- Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically easier to use" – The Wall Street Journal

This question came up on a list recently aned it was recommended that you check the following websites: http://www.cartes.freeuk.com/time/time.htm http://www.costumegallery.com/ My inclination would be to google the name of the photographer. You never know what you might get. Hope this helps. Nancy Frey Newcastle, Ontario ----- Original Message ----- From: "marlene shaw" <jmshaw01@yahoo.co.uk> To: <ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 8:55 AM Subject: [ENG-WIL] Old photographs > Hi List, > > Old photographs have come to light of my GGrandparents from Wiltshire no dates they were taken by L Porter 42,New Road Chippenham would anyone know what dates this Photograph Studio was trading , Thank You > Marlene. > > > --------------------------------- > Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically easier to use" - The Wall Street Journal > > > ==== ENG-WILTSHIRE Mailing List ==== > Please keep messages to the list on topic. No off-topic subjects, announcements, or the like without prior permission from the > administrator (ENG-WILTSHIRE-admin@rootsweb.com). > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > >

http://www.cartes.freeuk.com/time/time.htm http://www.costumegallery.com/ http://www.costumes.org/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "marlene shaw" <jmshaw01@yahoo.co.uk> To: <ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 8:55 AM Subject: [ENG-WIL] Old photographs > Hi List, > > Old photographs have come to light of my GGrandparents from Wiltshire no dates they were taken by L Porter 42,New Road Chippenham would anyone know what dates this Photograph Studio was trading , Thank You > Marlene. > > > --------------------------------- > Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail . "The New Version is radically easier to use" - The Wall Street Journal > > > ==== ENG-WILTSHIRE Mailing List ==== > Please keep messages to the list on topic. No off-topic subjects, announcements, or the like without prior permission from the > administrator (ENG-WILTSHIRE-admin@rootsweb.com). > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > >

Hi Listers, I also have Barnes relations , Fanny Barnes b. 1826 Wiltshire who mar. Daniel Merrett Margaret Barnes b. 1791c Gls who mar. Richard Cobley Winifred Barnes b. 1612c who mar. Barnaby Gauntlett anyone have these in their family, Marlene. Christopher Ridings <cnridings@exemail.com.au> wrote: I am descended from Mary BARNES 1804 Alderbury, just SE of Salisbury. Does this ring any bells for anyone anywhere? shalom Chris Christopher Ridings cnridings@exemail.com.au > > > From: "Eliz Hanebury" > Date: 7 July 2006 11:34:03 AM > To: ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > > > I will have to see a fair bit north and west of Salisbury > but I > haven't a clue how far - possibly 30 KM > > Eliz > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "janice lutz" > To: > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 3:39 PM > Subject: Re: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > > > | My Barnes family is from Fisherton Anger, is that anywhere near your > Malmesbury? Janice > | ----- Original Message ----- > | From: Eliz Hanebury > | To: ENG-WILTSHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> L@rootsweb.com> > | Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 6:29 PM > | Subject: Re: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > | > | > | I have Barnes connections, they were from Malmesbury > | > | > | Eliz > | ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "janice lutz" > > | To: > L@rootsweb.com>> > | Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 5:20 PM > | Subject: [ENG-WIL] Wiltshire names > | > | > | |I hope I am doing this correctly, if not please let me know how > to post > to > | this site. > | | I am researching the following names in Wiltshire: CHAMBERS, > WHITE, > | UNDERHILL, TOWNSEND, BARNES, MARCHANT AND CHANT. Does anyone > have ties > to > | these names? Janice > > ==== ENG-WILTSHIRE Mailing List ==== * UK genealogy: http://www.genuki.org.uk/ * Wiltshire County Council Research Guide: http://www.wiltshire.gov.uk/index/heritage/wsro/researchguides.htm * Passenger lists, shipping schedules, etc.: http://TheShipsList.com/ ============================== Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx --------------------------------- All New Yahoo! Mail – Tired of Vi@gr@! come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect you.