Hi I have found the following family on the *1871* census- Richard _Foxall_ age 43 Sarah - 44 Mary - 23 Harriet - 20 They live at _14 Lawley Street_ Birmingham but come from Bridgnorth Shropshire. There seem to be no other trace of them on any census or in the church records in Bridgnorth. However there are quite a few matches to a family that I am looking for where the daughter Harriet got married in 1870 from the same address. Does anyone know of this '_Foxall_' family? Joy

Just co-incidence, I would think. Area would be the same, numbers depend on how many other death there were. Anne On 6 Dec 2006, at 17:21, Audreywgoodier@aol.com wrote: > Hi List. > I have death certificate nos for 1846 and 1850 first for Wife , 2nd for > Husband both no`s are the same, how can this be? they are in > Cheltenham, later > members of the family are from Birmingham. > Thank you to anyone who can help. > > Audrey. > > _____________________________________________

Posted on behalf of "Zoe Rees" <zoe.rees@BIRMINGHAM.GOV.UK> Wendy B'ham List Admin --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Birmingham City Archives - Notice of Reduced Service The lifts in Central Library are currently experiencing repeated breakdowns. To rectify this the Goods lift will shortly be taken out of service from Monday 11th December until approximately January 27th 2007. This will prevent the City Archives from fetching documents from our basement store in the usual way. Please telephone 0121 303 4217 in advance of your visit, to ascertain whether we will be able to serve your requests. While the lift is out of service we will only be able to retrieve archives that are small and light. We will only be able to do two document collections per day, one before the start of day at 10 am, and one between 2 - 3pm. If you wish to visit us in the morning, please contact us at least one day before your visit so that we can collect your documents. If you wish to visit us in the afternoon, please make sure that we have your request by 12 noon. On Saturdays, only one document collection will be made before we open, so please order the day before. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause you. Not all of our archives will be affected by this reduced service, e.g. Parish Registers, Archives of Soho, Hardman Collection will be served as normal. Birmingham City Archives December 2006

Kia Ora Christina There's a family of Brittons who emigrated to Canada- have you checked there? I haven't explored the name at all but one of mine married David Britton in the 1890s. Always worth having a look in the Colonies if you "lose" a rellie! Cheers Marlene in Aotearoa Christina Hunt wrote: > I have just found that the maiden name for the wife of my Edwin HEWIN/Hewins was BRITTON. > Doe anyone have her or her marriage to Edwin. I found her through a late born son. The > earlier children were pre Civil Registration so I am not %100 certain she is their mother. > Also there was another Edwin Hewin (m. to Leah) at the same time in the Birmingham and > Stafford County area. Does anyone have further on this Edwin who m. Ann? Parents? He seems > to disappear but is mentioned in his dau. Emma's marriage in 1844. No sign of either Edwin > or Ann in 1850. > Thanks, > Chris > > Family Group Sheet > ================================================================================= > Husband: Edwin HEWIN > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Birth: abt 1801 > Occupation: 1844 Button burnisher > Marriage: bef 1826 > Father: > Mother: > =================================================================================== > Wife: Ann BRITTON > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Birth: abt 1796 > Death: 1848 (??) Birmingham, England > Father: > Mother: > ================================================================================== > ================================================================================== > 1 F Emma HEWIN > Birth: abt 1825 Birmingham, England > Death: 1895 England > Spouse: Thomas WELCH (1823-1889) > Marriage: 15 Jul 1844 Parish of Harborne, Stafford County, England > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 2 F Mary HEWIN > Birth: abt 1826 Warwickshire, England > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 3 M Edward HEWIN > Birth: abt 1828 Warwickshire, England > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 4 M Henry HEWIN > Birth: abt 1830 Warwickshire, England > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 5 F Elizabeth HEWIN > Birth: abt 1833 Warwickshire, England > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 6 M George HEWIN > Birth: 8 Feb 1834 Warwickshire, England > Chr: 2 Mar 1834 Edgbaston, Warwick, England > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > 7 M William HEWIN > Birth: Mar 1840 Warwickshire, England > ================================================================================= > > > Chris > > > > > _____________________________________________ > Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: > http://www.bham.de/ > > Any problems, please contact the List Admin: ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Would someone with more knowledge than myself look at familyhistoryonline.net and see if this information is the same as that on the CD?? On this site you just pay a few cents for the specific information you want to see. Thank you . RaKay >From: "Heather HH" <hh_591@hotmail.com> >Reply-To: eng-warks-birmingham@rootsweb.com >To: eng-warks-birmingham@rootsweb.com >Subject: [B'ham] King's Norton...a further question >Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:06:32 -0700 > >Mike..are all the parishes that you mentioned that are on the CD not >incorporated into the IGI or is it only King's Norton (St Nicholas) not on >the IGI? > >Heather > >_________________________________________________________________ >Off to school, going on a trip, or moving? Windows Live (MSN) Messenger >lets >you stay in touch with friends and family wherever you go. Click here to >find out how to sign up! http://www.telusmobility.com/msnxbox/ > >_____________________________________________ >Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: >http://www.bham.de/ > >Any problems, please contact the List Admin: >ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Share your latest news with your friends with the Windows Live Spaces friends module. http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mk

I am would like to hear from anyone researching the family of Thomas WELCH He married Emma HEWIN Marriage 15 Jul 1844 (age 20) Parish of Harborne, Stafford County, England Children Julia WELCH (2 May 1846 - ) Married Henry Donovan Thomas WELCH (abt 1849 - ) Married Clara Nightingale Fanny WELCH (16 Aug 1851 - ) Married Thomas A. Hunt & Geo. Charles Holyoak Emma WELCH (abt 1855 - ) Married Michael McDonald Margaret WELCH (abt 1858 - ) Walter G. WELCH (abt 1861 - ) Married Annie Swingler Homer?? Frank WELCH (abt 1864 - ) They live in Birmingham. Thomas was a cabinet maker, cabinet liner. Thanks, Chris

Thanks Marlene. I haven't really found them to lose them yet. LOL I think I will have to go back and look at All Saints parish for starters. The later family seems to have moved around a bit. Kia Ora Christina There's a family of Brittons who emigrated to Canada- have you checked there? I haven't explored the name at all but one of mine married David Britton in the 1890s. Always worth having a look in the Colonies if you "lose" a rellie! Cheers Marlene in Aotearoa Christina Hunt wrote: > I have just found that the maiden name for the wife of my Edwin > HEWIN/Hewins was BRITTON. > Doe anyone have her or her marriage to Edwin. I found her through > a late born son. The earlier children were pre Civil Registration > so I am not %100 certain she is their mother. > Also there was another Edwin Hewin (m. to Leah) at the same time > in the Birmingham and Stafford County area. Does anyone have > further on this Edwin who m. Ann? Parents? He seems to disappear > but is mentioned in his dau. Emma's marriage in 1844. No sign of > either Edwin or Ann in 1850. Thanks, Chris >

Hello Bob, Thanks for this I think I will have to send for a birth certificate and plead for help from John at the registry office. Best wishes Wendy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Barker" <rbarker15@tiscali.co.uk> To: <eng-warks-birmingham@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 5:33 PM Subject: [B'ham] George Newbold > George Newbold - births > George H Newbold, born 1866, Aston > George W Newbold, born 1872, Aston > George A newbold, born 1884, Aston > > On Family Search > 1881 Census: > Charles Newbold, age 26, born Coventry, Journeyman Baker > Elizabeth, wife, age 25, born Worcester > Albert, son, age 4, born Birmingham > Rose, daughter, age 2, born Birmingham > > Suggest that George Newbold listed as age 26 on the 1891 census is a > mistake. > If he is aged 26 then he could be the brother of Charles, listed wrongly > as Son, or > He was the George born 1884 in Aston and has been wrongly aged as 26 > instead of 6. > I would go for the latter. > All the best, Bob in Kingsbury > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. > It has removed 3971 spam emails to date. > Paying users do not have this message in their emails. > Try SPAMfighter for free now! > _____________________________________________ > Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: > http://www.bham.de/ > > Any problems, please contact the List Admin: > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi, A big thank you to all who sent information on soldiers that were killed in WW1 & who were connected to the areas of Langley & Oldbury. All this information will be included in the book that we hope will be published in the Spring by our local history society. We now have nearly 500 names from various sources with accompanying photos & history of each soldier so the book will be a wonderful memorial to these brave lads. Once again thanks for your help Lynn

George Newbold - births George H Newbold, born 1866, Aston George W Newbold, born 1872, Aston George A newbold, born 1884, Aston On Family Search 1881 Census: Charles Newbold, age 26, born Coventry, Journeyman Baker Elizabeth, wife, age 25, born Worcester Albert, son, age 4, born Birmingham Rose, daughter, age 2, born Birmingham Suggest that George Newbold listed as age 26 on the 1891 census is a mistake. If he is aged 26 then he could be the brother of Charles, listed wrongly as Son, or He was the George born 1884 in Aston and has been wrongly aged as 26 instead of 6. I would go for the latter. All the best, Bob in Kingsbury -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 3971 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter for free now!

I would like to say a big thank you to all the lovely people on the list for their time and suggestions. Especially Michele, Jane, Nivard, Chris, Ken and Helen who I think may have solved the mystery. As a note I have just made contact with Charles NEWBOLD's gt gt grandson on "Genes". Perhaps he will know more. What a coincidence. Many thanks Wendy

Wendy, Looking at the free BMD st Caths there are only three George's born in Warks from 1854 to 1885 there is a George Albert born 1884 so could be only 6. The other two are 1866 & 1872. As a suggestion send for the birth cert from B'Ham and tell them not to send it if the parents aren't Charles and Elizabeth. It is 3Qu 1884 Aston 6D 329. Ken B ----- Original Message ----- From: "Helen Verrall" <hverrall@ihug.co.nz> To: <eng-warks-birmingham@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:18 PM Subject: Re: [B'ham] George NEWBOLD > Wendy > > Folio 26 page 45 the entry definitely shows George's age as 26 !! > But possibly an error on enumerators part , when transcribing the > information. > > Helen > New Zealand > > > -----Original Message----- > From: eng-warks-birmingham-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:eng-warks-birmingham-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Wendy > Partridge > Sent: Thursday, 7 December 2006 5:06 a.m. > To: ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: [B'ham] George NEWBOLD > > Hello List > > I am a little confused (no change there some would say) I have the NEWBOLD > family in 1891 as follows; > > Charles NEWBOLD head 37 Baker born Coventry. > Elizabeth NEWBOLD wife 35 born Worcester > Albert NEWBOLD son 14 born Birmingham > Rose NEWBOLD dau 12 " " > George NEWBOLD son 26 " " > Thomas NEWBOLD son 8 " " > Elizabeth NEWBOLD dau 5 " " > Lucy NEWBOLD dau 1 " " > Frank NEWBOLD son 1 month " " > > Where does George fit in as son age 26 that would mean Elizabeth would > have > had him aged 9. Why is he listed in the middle of the family? Also no > occupation is recorded for him. > > If anyone has any suggestions or would like to view the census its RG12/ > 2420. > > Many thanks > > Wendy > > _____________________________________________ > Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: > http://www.bham.de/ > > Any problems, please contact the List Admin: > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.13/577 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 > 4:39 p.m. > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.13/577 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 > 4:39 p.m. > > _____________________________________________ > Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: > http://www.bham.de/ > > Any problems, please contact the List Admin: > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Wendy, just had another look at 1881 and there are two George Newbold's who could fit in age 15yrs . One a puple who is at: Institution For Deaf & Dumb Church Rd Edgbaston, Warwick, England and another who is: Lodger Woolwich, Middlesex, England. Could he have been a brother to Charles or something like that? Just another line of thought. Chris P. NZ :-)

Hi Wendy, George was not on the 1881 Census , so yes a mistake in transcribing I say. 1881 Cen: Charles NEWBOLD Head M Male 26 Coventry, Warwick, England Journeyman Baker Elizabeth NEWBOLD Wife M Female 25 Worcester, England Albert NEWBOLD Son Male 4 Birmingham, Warwick, England Rose NEWBOLD Daughter Female 2 Birmingham, Warwick, England Chris P. NZ:-)

Hello Chris Thank you for this I think that the Edgbaston address is the most likely as it would explain a lot. All Charles siblings that I have found were born in Coventry. George could have been born in Birmingham as I have not located them all. I know Charles widowed mother went to America before 1881, she is in Rhode Island in 1880 with two of her children. In 1900 it states she had 12 children 9 living in the UK. Many thanks Wendy ----- Original Message ----- From: "C. Pounder" <cpounder@ihug.co.nz> To: <eng-warks-birmingham@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 8:51 PM Subject: Re: [B'ham] George NEWBOLD > Hi Wendy, just had another look at 1881 and there are two George Newbold's > who could fit in age 15yrs . > One a puple who is at: > Institution For Deaf & Dumb Church Rd > Edgbaston, Warwick, England > and > another who is: Lodger Woolwich, Middlesex, England. > > Could he have been a brother to Charles or something like that? > > Just another line of thought. > > Chris P. NZ :-) > _____________________________________________ > Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: > http://www.bham.de/ > > Any problems, please contact the List Admin: > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi List I have a 3 day free access to ancestry ,but clicking on a members tree ,and sending email ,comes on screen "a error in sending email"..Any idea what happened or does free trial not include this type of contact. the persons concerned were as below , so if anyone can check it out ,and if you can get through just send my email address. I searched on william butler 1820 archer Family Tree Personal Member Tree 4 attached records Name: William Butler Birth: Abt 1818 - Warwick (Warwickshire) Salt-Winspeare Family Tree Public Member Tree 1 source Name: William Butler Birth: 1819 - Bedworth, Warwickshire, England Parents: Timothy Butler, Elizabeth Warner thank you.

Wendy Folio 26 page 45 the entry definitely shows George's age as 26 !! But possibly an error on enumerators part , when transcribing the information. Helen New Zealand -----Original Message----- From: eng-warks-birmingham-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-warks-birmingham-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Wendy Partridge Sent: Thursday, 7 December 2006 5:06 a.m. To: ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [B'ham] George NEWBOLD Hello List I am a little confused (no change there some would say) I have the NEWBOLD family in 1891 as follows; Charles NEWBOLD head 37 Baker born Coventry. Elizabeth NEWBOLD wife 35 born Worcester Albert NEWBOLD son 14 born Birmingham Rose NEWBOLD dau 12 " " George NEWBOLD son 26 " " Thomas NEWBOLD son 8 " " Elizabeth NEWBOLD dau 5 " " Lucy NEWBOLD dau 1 " " Frank NEWBOLD son 1 month " " Where does George fit in as son age 26 that would mean Elizabeth would have had him aged 9. Why is he listed in the middle of the family? Also no occupation is recorded for him. If anyone has any suggestions or would like to view the census its RG12/ 2420. Many thanks Wendy _____________________________________________ Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: http://www.bham.de/ Any problems, please contact the List Admin: ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.13/577 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 4:39 p.m. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.13/577 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 4:39 p.m.

Hi Gary, On the IGI enter the parents names on the right hand side and births on the left. Enter the area and leave the date unentered. All the children recorded for those parents should show up. You may find children from a different period as well if the parents names were the same and they may also be useful to you, Doug. -- Doug Hawkes e-mail: dhawkes@ee.ryerson.ca > Hi list > > On looking at Igi for batch number M165212 , I found the couple I wanted > , then I needed to find the children ,( I know their names), So I > entered C165212, a kent number, for yalding, and I can only come up > with females only, 40 off, I have tried going up/down in mumbers to > find Males , but no luck, any suggestions. > > gary hodge > > _____________________________________________ > Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: > http://www.bham.de/ > > Any problems, please contact the List Admin: > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Heather I learned of something else to view those records. I haven't tried it yet but try familyhistoryonline I am going to have to look up this address again. RaKay >From: "Heather HH" <hh_591@hotmail.com> >Reply-To: eng-warks-birmingham@rootsweb.com >To: eng-warks-birmingham@rootsweb.com >Subject: [B'ham] King's Norton...a further question >Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:06:32 -0700 > >Mike..are all the parishes that you mentioned that are on the CD not >incorporated into the IGI or is it only King's Norton (St Nicholas) not on >the IGI? > >Heather > >_________________________________________________________________ >Off to school, going on a trip, or moving? Windows Live (MSN) Messenger >lets >you stay in touch with friends and family wherever you go. Click here to >find out how to sign up! http://www.telusmobility.com/msnxbox/ > >_____________________________________________ >Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: >http://www.bham.de/ > >Any problems, please contact the List Admin: >ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ MSN Shopping has everything on your holiday list. Get expert picks by style, age, and price. Try it! http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8000,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata=200601&tcode=wlmtagline

Hello Helen, Yes I thought it did. I am puzzled as 26 being a strange number, if he was born between Rose and Thomas he would be 11, 10 or 9. The only other explanation is perhaps he was Charles brother. I will have to delve deeper into this one. Thanks for looking Helen. Best wishes Wendy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Helen Verrall" <hverrall@ihug.co.nz> To: <eng-warks-birmingham@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 8:18 AM Subject: Re: [B'ham] George NEWBOLD > Wendy > > Folio 26 page 45 the entry definitely shows George's age as 26 !! > But possibly an error on enumerators part , when transcribing the > information. > > Helen > New Zealand > > > -----Original Message----- > From: eng-warks-birmingham-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:eng-warks-birmingham-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Wendy > Partridge > Sent: Thursday, 7 December 2006 5:06 a.m. > To: ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: [B'ham] George NEWBOLD > > Hello List > > I am a little confused (no change there some would say) I have the NEWBOLD > family in 1891 as follows; > > Charles NEWBOLD head 37 Baker born Coventry. > Elizabeth NEWBOLD wife 35 born Worcester > Albert NEWBOLD son 14 born Birmingham > Rose NEWBOLD dau 12 " " > George NEWBOLD son 26 " " > Thomas NEWBOLD son 8 " " > Elizabeth NEWBOLD dau 5 " " > Lucy NEWBOLD dau 1 " " > Frank NEWBOLD son 1 month " " > > Where does George fit in as son age 26 that would mean Elizabeth would > have > had him aged 9. Why is he listed in the middle of the family? Also no > occupation is recorded for him. > > If anyone has any suggestions or would like to view the census its RG12/ > 2420. > > Many thanks > > Wendy > > _____________________________________________ > Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: > http://www.bham.de/ > > Any problems, please contact the List Admin: > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.13/577 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 > 4:39 p.m. > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.13/577 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 > 4:39 p.m. > > _____________________________________________ > Tracing Ancestors in Birmingham: > http://www.bham.de/ > > Any problems, please contact the List Admin: > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-admin@rootsweb.com > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message