If you look at the site and consider just how much work, expense and effort went in to providing what is there. Which one can view at no expense. then look at the number of posts complaining about supposed 'shortcomings' of the site. All I can think of is when 'YOU' have put that amount of effort and resources into a research project and then meet with complaints from people who are willing to use your work for free. Then and only then are you qualified to express an opinion. This does not ONLY apply to the post I'm replying to. To those behind the site.: Congratulations on finding a way to put up a more than useful resource and I hope that some of these 'grinches' at least have the courtesy to offer support to your project in one form or another. Otherwise since they don't qualify to comment what they have to say should simply be ignored by all. */Mick/* On 12/08/2012 12:19 PM, Geoff Fairbairn wrote: >> From: charani.b@gmail.com >> >> If you click on the red "pins", it gives a little more information >> with a link to further information. > Don't bother. The further information in every case is > "High Explosive Bomb : > Source: Aggregate Night Time Bomb Census 7th October 1940 to 6 June 1941 > Fell > > between Oct. 7, 1940 and June 6, 1941" > > and a present day address, which in some case bears little relation to the 1940/1 address. > Geoff > > . > *************************************** > Send your List messages using **PLAIN TEXT** and always **TRIM AWAY** superfluous old messages in replies. > > List Admin can be contacted at: Eng-Surrey-admin@rootsweb.com > . > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-SURREY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

I would echo these sentiments. This website represents an enormous amount of work and I congratulate those who contributed. Perhaps there are others who wish to make a positive contribution and who would prepare similar research for other date ranges Michael Allbrook -----Original Message----- From: eng-surrey-bounces@rootsweb.com On Behalf Of Mick Sent: 10 December 2012 01:57 To: eng-surrey@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [SRY] Bomb Site If you look at the site and consider just how much work, expense and effort went in to providing what is there. Which one can view at no expense. then look at the number of posts complaining about supposed 'shortcomings' of the site. All I can think of is when 'YOU' have put that amount of effort and resources into a research project and then meet with complaints from people who are willing to use your work for free. Then and only then are you qualified to express an opinion. This does not ONLY apply to the post I'm replying to. To those behind the site.: Congratulations on finding a way to put up a more than useful resource and I hope that some of these 'grinches' at least have the courtesy to offer support to your project in one form or another. Otherwise since they don't qualify to comment what they have to say should simply be ignored by all. Mick On 12/08/2012 12:19 PM, Geoff Fairbairn wrote: >> From: charani.b@gmail.com >> If you click on the red "pins", it gives a little more information with a link to further information. Don't bother. The further information in every case is "High Explosive Bomb : Source: Aggregate Night Time Bomb Census 7th October 1940 to 6 June 1941 Fell between Oct. 7, 1940 and June 6, 1941" and a present day address, which in some case bears little relation to the 1940/1 address. Geoff To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-SURREY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Send your List messages using **PLAIN TEXT** and always **TRIM AWAY** superfluous old messages in replies. List Admin can be contacted at: Eng-Surrey-admin@rootsweb.com