Late night/early morning Typo - so you can breath again Jason. Sorry about that Hilary .> Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 08:40:05 -0700 > From: Jason Austin <jason.austin@shaw.ca> > Subject: Re: [SRY] Was Ancestry New Records now > AUSTIN > To: eng-surrey@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: <4ACCB655.3060709@shaw.ca> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > Thanks Hilary. Bricklayers and builders did seem to > be interchangeable > descriptions at that time. I'll follow this > line - but my man was an > Austin not a Martin. Was that a typo? > > Regards > > Jason > > > HILARY BLANFORD wrote: > > > Hallo Jason > > I searched the new Ancestry > records for blank first name and > > Mart*n Surname, father Richard > child born Bermondsey Surrey England. > > > > This produced Rachel daughter > of Richard and Rachal baptised Sep > > 3rd 1815. Father a bricklayer > living in Bermondsey Street, so he > > could be the father of your > John. Maybe he became a builder or > > maybe John exaggerated his > father's status on his marriage > > certificate to impress the in > laws. > > > > If you have access to the > records and search for Rachel you will > > find 2 entries. One is > in the printed baptismal > > register register, the other > is in the 'rough register'. If you > > start with the latter you can > click back to the 1915 register at > > the top of the entry from the > image view, find the list of > > registers available and then > do a manual search forwards in case > > your John is in there but was > missed from the transcription. You > > can also find these registers > from the Southwark listings. The > > 'rough registers' tend to be > more accurate, and in the case of St > > MM Bermondsey, they include > the date of birth in the register of > > baptisms. The date of > birth is not shown in the printed register > > of baptisms. > > > > If you still can't find him it > may be worth looking at the > > Bishop's Transcripts for 1820 > -1824 period - his birth appears to > > be round 1822. > > > > You may have discovered this > already, but Saint Mary Magdalen at > > Bermondsey does not have an e > on the end of Magdalen. It is often > > mis-spelt including in the > historic Ancestry records, so you may > > need to use both spellings > when searching for your family. > > > Hilary