Another thought.....If I bought something in a shop that didn't do the job I was told it would do then I'd demand either a replacement or my money back..there are laws about these things. Let us all contact these people and demand any money back from them. David 2009/1/16 David Mills <[email protected]> > Well, I found my grandmother(Ethel Donegani) in Whitechapel where she was > training to be a nurse at the London Hospital but can I find all those > Millses in Gt Yarmouth? Can I like as heck!? > > I'm leaving it well alone for a while! > > David > > 2009/1/16 saira Horner <[email protected]> > > ...I'm really hoping it comes to Ancestry eventually as I like it there and >> can't afford two subscriptions!! I think it says on findmypast though that >> it won't be available elsewhere on subscription ;o( >> >> REMEMBER - The question you are asking may have already been answered. >> Threaded Archives at - >> >> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/Archives >> >> Searchable Archives at - >> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/ >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > >

Well, I found my grandmother(Ethel Donegani) in Whitechapel where she was training to be a nurse at the London Hospital but can I find all those Millses in Gt Yarmouth? Can I like as heck!? I'm leaving it well alone for a while! David 2009/1/16 saira Horner <[email protected]> > ...I'm really hoping it comes to Ancestry eventually as I like it there and > can't afford two subscriptions!! I think it says on findmypast though that > it won't be available elsewhere on subscription ;o( > > REMEMBER - The question you are asking may have already been answered. > Threaded Archives at - > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/Archives > > Searchable Archives at - > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/ > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: manymagpies Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sal.general/6588.1.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Well, they say everything comes to him who waits. Well done. A good start to 2009. David Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

...I'm really hoping it comes to Ancestry eventually as I like it there and can't afford two subscriptions!! I think it says on findmypast though that it won't be available elsewhere on subscription ;o(

I can read my rellies handwriting, no problem with that. As clear as clear. It's the paid for transcriptions I am having problems with at the first instance. They're not the same as wot's on the paid for view page. It's a bit like writing out a cheque and putting two different accounts on your cheque tab and on the real cheque itself. Make sense? 8-) Nevertheless, let's not lose our sense of proportion, eh. Cheers Graham Melbourne Oz

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: ChrisWard2507 Surnames: Lloyd Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sal.general/6588.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: An update on this.... The 1911 census reveals that William Lloyd was from Bobbington, Staffs which happens to be close to Claverley. In retrospect, it's perhaps easy to see how the birth place had been corrupted to Belenton and Clairy in the two previous censuses. Regards, Chris Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: AmandaRyder71 Surnames: Guy Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sal.general/6623.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Hi, I have a Beatrice Guy born Madeley @1890 her father is Thomas Guy born @ 1865 madeley and mom Annie maria Smallman 1865 Broseley. They have 7 other children too. Regards Amanda Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: tomoh4wk Surnames: GUY,HAYWARD,BODEN,SMALLMAN Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.britisles.england.sal.general/6623/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Looking for surname GUY in Madeley Beatrice b 1888c Thomas b 1865c Joseph b 1837c Wombridge Richard b ?1810 Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

Thanks Graham. I'll check out the link to compare coverage. Do you know if there is any additional info for each entry? The NBI is basic: Name of Deceased, Date of Burial, Place of Burial, Age at Death. Does the SBI have anything more? Heather Graham of Salop wrote: > Heather, > The differences (additions) are difficult to pinpoint as they are spread all around the County and through various time spans. It is probably best if you take a look at the "Status" page for the CD on > http://www.sfhs.org.uk/Documents/SBI4Parishes.doc which shows the “Parish” > Name, the Status “Checked/Not Checked” (Not Checked means they have been transcribed, but a second person has not yet reviewed them, however the review will only occasionally find a very small percentage of errors, if any), “Earliest” (This is the oldest date in the batch of Burials) and “Latest” (Is the date of the most recent Burials in the Batch). The Batches are split up because there are some gaps large and small where registers no longer exist or are totally unreadable. > > Hope this Helps > > Graham of Salop > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of The Quineys > Sent: 12 January 2009 15:31 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ENG-SHROP] SFHS Burial Records Index > > Hi Sherry > > Can you tell me what SBI offers over and above NBI? > Are there different entries/better coverage? > Is there additional info about each entry? > > For details about SBI v4, I found this site ... > http://www.sfhs.org.uk/shropshireburials.asp Hopefully, as you have the v2 info in front of you, you can see what the changes/improvements are. > > Heather > > > > > Sherry Landa and Russell Johnson wrote: > >> I have SBI v2 which is a previous version and I find that it's worth having that and the NBI (I have version 1 of that). What I'd like to know is EXACTLY what is the difference between version 2 and version 4 of the SBI. I also have the Quarter Sessions CD and have found the disks from SFHS excellent. >> >> I have some fiche as well, which are a little disappointing in quality (think it's the originals which are poor) and am interested to know if the fiche data will ever be put onto CD the way, for example, OFHS have done. >> >> Sherry Landa (23170, Viersat, FRANCE) >> >> >> >> >> I'm considering buying the SFHS Burial Records Index CD Rom. However, I already the National Burials Index and wondered how much they overlap each other. I'm hoping that one of you will already have a copy of each and can advise :-) >> >> >>

It's early days, but already I am much poorer and indeed find the transcripts quite often at odds with what is on the original page. Did a cat or dog with a thick paw transcribe some events? One wonders. Anyway, here's an example of how to lose your money. If you settle on a page to view which seems absolutely certain, as I have done, but find the address written by the household head is just New Malden --- erk, not enough for your records even though you do have the family! You will then have to go back to downloading the transcript page at extra cost. Lovely..... got you either way! Transcript page for print version says Lynmouth Lynton Road, New Malden (pity they couldn't give me a number!) but why should one have to pay twice for this information? Why can't they include it in the 30 credit page download? No, no, can't do that. It would muck up everything and one would lose revenue. Cynical Graham, as always. Other folk are reporting great errors with names on the transcript page compared to the original. I've so far found a couple that were annoying but not all that bothersome. Credit card's lookin' very pale at the moment. Cheers Graham Melbourne Oz

Hello Stephen, I cannot see a link between our Ellen Heaths. It is a common surname. Do you have Ancestry? I found the birth of Louisa at Liverpool on Ancestry and also an Ellen HEATH born June Quarter 1881 at Liverpool . I am helping my daughter to do this research as it is my husband`s Great Grandmother who is Ellen Heath. We cannot find her marriage to a John CHANT which she says on the 1911 census took place thirty nine years ago. Have you found Louisa on the 1911 census? That may help you.Well we will keep you in mind if anything comes to light. Maureen.

KEITH ROBERTS wrote: > Following a bout of searching the 1911 census for a few prime > ancestors I have reached a conclusion. 1. It`s darned expensive Yes, it is. It will be on FindMyPast later this year in a subscription package. > 2. Wherever did they recruit the transcribers? Some interpretations > of place names in particular are unbelievable which doesn`t help > the search process. [...] I have > to say that the handwriting of the enumerator left a little to be > desired Don't blame the enumator, blame your ancestors! The transcribers had to deal with hundreds of thousands of different hands, not just one as in the past. Misspellings can be the result of your ancestors misspellings. Don't forget *you* know what a name or place should be, but not every transcriber will have an encyclopaedic knowledge of names (esp surnames) and places (esp obscure villages and hamlets). I've seen Oulton transcribed as Dulton. It did look like a D at the beginning. I know it isn't because I knew what it should be. What you are seeing are the original household schedules as completed by your ancestors. There was no input from the enumerator and there are no enumerator's books either. I'm not sure if these are going to be digitised or not this time. > 4. The experienced census searcher will find it easy but I`m afraid > the newcomer to searching will find it very very frustrating. I don't think newcomers will find it that difficult. I asked my young to find a particular person and she managed it with no problems. > PS. Whatever happened to the whole of Wales? It hasn't been transcribed yet. It will follow the last half dozen or so English counties.

Graham Price wrote: > I can read my rellies handwriting, no problem with that. As clear as > clear. It's the paid for transcriptions I am having problems with at > the first instance. They're not the same as wot's on the paid for > view page. You can report the errors and you don't have to re-purchase the transcript either. Just go to the "My records" tab at the top of the page and there is a list of everything you've already looked at. Just click on the relevant record and make yor report.

I have had the same frustration with McLoughlin that is indexed and transcribed as Loughlin and the Mc is a second forename !! Luckily I knew exactly where they should have been in 1911 as my father was born just after the census date. The householder's schedule was perfectly clear. I have another frustrating one that in the address box was "copied over" thus no address. I fail to understand why they have not included the regular ennumerator's book as before so that one can see others on the page where often rellies appear..the Irish have done it so it is not difficult. These irritating errors are making it a very user unfriendly project and very expensive..guess I will wait until it is released via ancestry..though they will have indexing issues. This project was handled by the people behind scotlandspeople site which rarely suffers from transcription errors so what went wrong with 1911.....too tight a budget and a rush to cash in on the demand for it. With scotlandspeople when one reports an error they credit the wasted credits and are always gratefull for the notification and do amend the indexing..but i pointed out my McLoughlin error and they did not even reply to my email so they are just not interested in anything apart from making a lot of money. Also at the moment wild card searching is off as they are worried about server loads..at their prices they could by several cellars full of the latest servers.. I guess that people will eventually be so put off that they will just wait until it is included in a site where they have a subscription and can search at leisure. I have used it purely for a few key lines that i need to bridge or need a marriage partner's age and place of birth. -------- Original Message -------- > I can read my rellies handwriting, no problem with that. As clear as > clear. It's the paid for transcriptions I am having problems with at > the first instance. They're not the same as wot's on the paid for > view page. It's a bit like writing out a cheque and putting two > different accounts on your cheque tab and on the real cheque itself. > Make sense? 8-) > > Nevertheless, let's not lose our sense of proportion, eh. > Cheers > Graham > Melbourne > Oz > > > > REMEMBER - The question you are asking may have already been answered. > Threaded Archives at - > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/Archives > > Searchable Archives at - > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/ > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > E-mail message checked by Internet Security (6.0.0.386) > Database version: 5.11550 > http://www.pctools.com/uk/internet-security/ > >

Regards Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "C Cannon" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 7:56 PM Subject: Re: [ENG-SHROP] 1911 and all that >I too found it better use a search with the minimum of information and then > add one thing and then remove it and try something different. Quite time > consuming. Even worse than weird spellings of place names, is the way some > of the Christian names are transcribed. > > chrissie > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "KEITH ROBERTS" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:21 PM > Subject: [ENG-SHROP] 1911 and all that > > >> Following a bout of searching the 1911 census for a few prime ancestors I >> have reached a conclusion. >> 1. It`s darned expensive to search @ 60 credits for .12p each or 280 >> credits for .09p each, and at a cost of 10 credits to view a transcript >> of >> the entry the absolute minimum one has to pay is 90p a go and if one >> wishes to see the actual page (which is much nicer anyway) then it will >> cost 30 credits @ .09 p = £2.70 and thats a lot of money for just one >> search. >> >> 2. Wherever did they recruit the transcribers? Some interpretations of >> place names in particular are unbelievable which doesn`t help the search >> process. I give you an example: >> A Mr William Roberts who I knew to have been born in Llanyblodwel, SAL in >> 1848, had moved to Hampstead, London, and who`s occupation I knew to be a >> draper was luckily >> for me hiding behind a place name of `Stalingblodwell` and he was a >> Retired Silk Mediat (try merchant!) His wife was from Hushington (try >> Huntingdon) and wait for it - one of his servants was from `Slaughton >> Mercought` (Try Llanbedr, Meirioneth!). I have to say that the >> handwriting >> of the enumerator left a little to be desired but - hey, I could read it >> quite plainly. >> Only for the Blodwell tacked onto the end of the Staling I would never >> ever have found that entry for my Grandads brother from the transcript >> search. >> >> 3. As is very often the case too much knowledge is a dangerous thing and >> the best way of initiating a search is just to input the absolute minimum >> ie; Name and year of birth which will hopefully bring up a list of >> possibles to view. Transcript gives name, relationship, marital status, >> sex, age, occupation and most important of all - where born. >> >> 4. The experienced census searcher will find it easy but I`m afraid the >> newcomer to searching will find it very very frustrating. >> >> PS. Whatever happened to the whole of Wales? >> >> KeithR >> >> >> >> REMEMBER - The question you are asking may have already been answered. >> Threaded Archives at - >> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/Archives >> >> Searchable Archives at - >> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/ >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > REMEMBER - The question you are asking may have already been answered. > Threaded Archives at - > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/Archives > > Searchable Archives at - > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/ > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.7/1892 - Release Date: 13/01/2009 8:04 PM

I've looked up and got pages for partners direct family, my maternal and paternal great grandparents and that's my lot - in other words I got the evidence for what I basically knew anyway but I won't be using it to search and investigate further, it's just too much! Incidentally, I think this census was filled in by the householder and just checked over by the enumerator - so it's your rellies handwriting that they cant read. Saira :O) 2009/1/14 KEITH ROBERTS <[email protected]> > Following a bout of searching the 1911 census for a few prime ancestors I > have reached a conclusion. > 1. It`s darned expensive to search @ 60 credits for .12p each or 280 > credits for .09p each, and at a cost of 10 credits to view a transcript of > the entry the absolute minimum one has to pay is 90p a go and if one wishes > to see the actual page (which is much nicer anyway) then it will cost 30 > credits @ .09 p = £2.70 and thats a lot of money for just one search. > > 2. Wherever did they recruit the transcribers? Some interpretations of > place names in particular are unbelievable which doesn`t help the search > process. I give you an example: > A Mr William Roberts who I knew to have been born in Llanyblodwel, SAL in > 1848, had moved to Hampstead, London, and who`s occupation I knew to be a > draper was luckily > for me hiding behind a place name of `Stalingblodwell` and he was a > Retired Silk Mediat (try merchant!) His wife was from Hushington (try > Huntingdon) and wait for it - one of his servants was from `Slaughton > Mercought` (Try Llanbedr, Meirioneth!). I have to say that the handwriting > of the enumerator left a little to be desired but - hey, I could read it > quite plainly. > Only for the Blodwell tacked onto the end of the Staling I would never ever > have found that entry for my Grandads brother from the transcript search. > > 3. As is very often the case too much knowledge is a dangerous thing and > the best way of initiating a search is just to input the absolute minimum > ie; Name and year of birth which will hopefully bring up a list of possibles > to view. Transcript gives name, relationship, marital status, sex, age, > occupation and most important of all - where born. > > 4. The experienced census searcher will find it easy but I`m afraid the > newcomer to searching will find it very very frustrating. > > PS. Whatever happened to the whole of Wales? > > KeithR > > > > REMEMBER - The question you are asking may have already been answered. > Threaded Archives at - > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/Archives > > Searchable Archives at - > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/ > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello Keith, I have been looking at the 1911 census, couldn't find my mother whose name was Nelly and her sister named Lizzie, eventually found them living with their Aunt, transcribed as Lozzie and Welly. Having looked at the record sheet, I came to the conclusion that either the transcribers couldn't read, or that they needed their specs changing. Lilian -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of KEITH ROBERTS Sent: 14 January 2009 22:21 To: [email protected] Subject: [ENG-SHROP] 1911 and all that 2. Wherever did they recruit the transcribers? Some interpretations of place names in particular are unbelievable which doesn`t help the search process. I give you an example: A Mr William Roberts who I knew to have been born in Llanyblodwel, SAL in 1848, had moved to Hampstead, London, and who`s occupation I knew to be a draper was luckily for me hiding behind a place name of `Stalingblodwell` and he was a Retired Silk Mediat (try merchant!) His wife was from Hushington (try Huntingdon) and wait for it - one of his servants was from `Slaughton Mercought` (Try Llanbedr, Meirioneth!). I have to say that the handwriting of the enumerator left a little to be desired but - hey, I could read it quite plainly. Only for the Blodwell tacked onto the end of the Staling I would never ever have found that entry for my Grandads brother from the transcript search. 3. PS. Whatever happened to the whole of Wales? KeithR REMEMBER - The question you are asking may have already been answered. Threaded Archives at - http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/Archi ves Searchable Archives at - http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Your comment below rang bells with me. I was looking for my Purser relations in Stourport. In the badly transcribed censi I found most of them under Pruser, Parser and Perser. In the end, I just put their christian names and birth date in to see what got churned out, and lo and behold there they were, mis-transcribed. Frustrating? Richard -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of KEITH ROBERTS Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 11:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [ENG-SHROP] 1911 and all that 2. Wherever did they recruit the transcribers? Some interpretations of place names in particular are unbelievable which doesn`t help the search process. I give you an example: A Mr William Roberts who I knew to have been born in Llanyblodwel, SAL in 1848, had moved to Hampstead, London, and who`s occupation I knew to be a draper was luckily for me hiding behind a place name of `Stalingblodwell` and he was a Retired Silk Mediat (try merchant!) His wife was from Hushington (try Huntingdon) and wait for it - one of his servants was from `Slaughton Mercought` (Try Llanbedr, Meirioneth!). I have to say that the handwriting of the enumerator left a little to be desired but - hey, I could read it quite plainly. Only for the Blodwell tacked onto the end of the Staling I would never ever have found that entry for my Grandads brother from the transcript search. 3. As is very often the case too much knowledge is a dangerous thing and the best way of initiating a search is just to input the absolute minimum ie; Name and year of birth which will hopefully bring up a list of possibles to view. Transcript gives name, relationship, marital status, sex, age, occupation and most important of all - where born. 4. The experienced census searcher will find it easy but I`m afraid the newcomer to searching will find it very very frustrating. PS. Whatever happened to the whole of Wales? KeithR

I got a notice that one of my messages was being held and am wondering if it was this one that I had sent  TO [email protected] so am resending it the same way its recorded on my sent copy except to add that I was commenting on a previous message that had been posted about ordering birth certificates and getting partial refund when its proven to be the wrong one, and a few extra words at the end to explain my question better.     Joyce Crete --- On Tue, 1/13/09, JOYCE CRETE <[email protected]> wrote:I too have an Evans needing to find a birth certificate. On his marriage certificate he was listed as being 22 in 1891  which means he was born in 1869, but he was 30 per his son which would make his born in 1861, making him 40 in 1901 but he was down as 35 on that census. He gave his place of birth as Welshampton and his father as Charles. There are several births of a Richard Evans with father Charles. I did order one birth certificate for 1865 at Ellesmere but his father was not Charles so I got a partial refund. I found a baptism record for a Richard born in Welshampton but no birth certificate. There is also a Richard's birth showing in WEM and wonder if anyone would have any records that would show any details of that childs birth? All the census reports that I've found show each Richard Evans away from home and working and living with other families. The Welshampton Richards parents had all their children registered except for their son Richard but thats why I think perhaps the one registered in WEM could also be theirs but would like to have more information to go on. This WEM link is my last resort, so if anyone has access to WEM birth records and could tell me more about it, I would sure appreciate it. Joyce

Heather, The differences (additions) are difficult to pinpoint as they are spread all around the County and through various time spans. It is probably best if you take a look at the "Status" page for the CD on http://www.sfhs.org.uk/Documents/SBI4Parishes.doc which shows the “Parish” Name, the Status “Checked/Not Checked” (Not Checked means they have been transcribed, but a second person has not yet reviewed them, however the review will only occasionally find a very small percentage of errors, if any), “Earliest” (This is the oldest date in the batch of Burials) and “Latest” (Is the date of the most recent Burials in the Batch). The Batches are split up because there are some gaps large and small where registers no longer exist or are totally unreadable. Hope this Helps Graham of Salop -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of The Quineys Sent: 12 January 2009 15:31 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ENG-SHROP] SFHS Burial Records Index Hi Sherry Can you tell me what SBI offers over and above NBI? Are there different entries/better coverage? Is there additional info about each entry? For details about SBI v4, I found this site ... http://www.sfhs.org.uk/shropshireburials.asp Hopefully, as you have the v2 info in front of you, you can see what the changes/improvements are. Heather Sherry Landa and Russell Johnson wrote: > I have SBI v2 which is a previous version and I find that it's worth having > that and the NBI (I have version 1 of that). What I'd like to know is > EXACTLY what is the difference between version 2 and version 4 of the SBI. I > also have the Quarter Sessions CD and have found the disks from SFHS > excellent. > > I have some fiche as well, which are a little disappointing in quality > (think it's the originals which are poor) and am interested to know if the > fiche data will ever be put onto CD the way, for example, OFHS have done. > > Sherry Landa (23170, Viersat, FRANCE) > > I'm considering buying the SFHS Burial Records Index CD Rom. However, I > already the National Burials Index and wondered how much they overlap > each other. I'm hoping that one of you will already have a copy of each > and can advise :-) > > REMEMBER - The question you are asking may have already been answered. Threaded Archives at - http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/Archives Searchable Archives at - http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/index/ENG-SHROPSHIRE-PLUS/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.7/1895 - Release Date: 15/01/2009 07:46 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.7/1895 - Release Date: 15/01/2009 07:46