RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [ROTH] 1871 SURNAME INDEX
    2. Pat Daubney
    3. Ruth Thanks so much. These are my families. Just noticed that Mary Jane WALKER is 71! Should that be 21?? Any other NEWSUM will be very welcome. As George was born in Rotherham there could be parents and/or siblings Regards Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ruth Hopkinson" <ruth.hopkinson@ntlworld.com> To: <ENG-ROTHERHAM-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:26 PM Subject: RE: [ROTH] 1871 SURNAME INDEX > Dear Pat > I've been watching this thread and feeling guilty as I also have the 1871 > census index, but have not had time to do any look ups for anyone. > Here is George NEWSUM and Robert WALKER > Surname first name age county birthplace piece folio E.D. place > NEWSUM GEORGE SMITH 33 YKS ROTHERHAM RG10/4702 85 5 ROTHERHAM > NEWSUM JANE 31 YKS THORPE RG10/4702 85 5 ROTHERHAM > NEWSUM JOHN SMITH 9 YKS ROTHERHAM RG10/4702 85 5 ROTHERHAM > NEWSUM KATE 5 YKS ROTHERHAM RG10/4702 85 5 ROTHERHAM > > WALKER ROBERT 51 YKS BALBY RG10/4702 41 2 ROTHERHAM > WALKER SARAH 53 YJS SOUTH KIRBY RG10/4702 41 2 ROTHERHAM > WALKER MARY JANE 71 YJS OULTON RG10/4702 41 2 ROTHERHAM > > Regards > Ruth

    06/30/2003 10:43:18