Thank you Rosemary. As this couple have grown up sons they're obviously not the 1896 marriage so my Sarah Ann remains a mystery! Thanks again Jean

Jean, Don't jump to hasty conclusions. The sons may be his but not hers. The children might all be her step-children. kindest regards, Peter Appleton -----Original Message----- From: eng-north-yorks-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-north-yorks-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Jean Greenwood Sent: 02 February 2008 12:06 To: eng-north-yorks@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [ENG-NORTH-YORKS] 1901 look up please Thank you Rosemary. As this couple have grown up sons they're obviously not the 1896 marriage so my Sarah Ann remains a mystery! Thanks again Jean ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-NORTH-YORKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Unless he was a widower!! -----Original Message----- From: eng-north-yorks-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-north-yorks-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Jean Greenwood Sent: 02 February 2008 13:06 To: eng-north-yorks@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [ENG-NORTH-YORKS] 1901 look up please Thank you Rosemary. As this couple have grown up sons they're obviously not the 1896 marriage so my Sarah Ann remains a mystery! Thanks again Jean ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-NORTH-YORKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message