Hi Walter The reason I thought I'd given you the wrong family was because of William in Adelaide's statement :- >I have the above ALFRED in my tree descended from JOHN GRAHAM >1876 >Ireland. >Relevant tree has been sent offlist for you information whereas the Liscard greengrocer from the 1901 Census I suggested to you was the son of Albert GRAHAM b1852 Liverpool? Regards Gordon From: "WALTER JONES" <alsrecs@btopenworld.com> To: <eng-merseyside@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 7:07 PM Subject: Re: [ENG-MERSEYSIDE] ALFRED GRAHAM >Hello Gordon, Cousin. >The reason for not saying anything about the "Wrong >Family" was, it wasn't, that is the family I have, and to be honest, I >don't know how all this started? I think I must have missed something, but >it is a problem I've found with Emails, as it is so easy to pick things up >wrongly. >Anyway enough of that, the info:- you sent was well >received, and the only problem I can see up to now with Williams, is it >seems as though one of us, probably me, seems to have taken a wrong fork >somewhere, but it'll get sorted, I hope. >Take Care. >Walter, Scotland. > >Gordon Evans <gordon.w.evans@btinternet.com> wrote: >Hello Walter >Would be interested to know whether I had in fact given you the wrong >GRAHAM >family in my earlier posting, as intimated by William in Adelaide. >If so, I'm rather surprised you didn't mention this in your reply thanking >me for the information? >I'm quite thick-skinned, so can take a "knock". :-) >Regards >Gordon

Hi Walter If this has to be an 'open book' there is nothing wrong with my statement that Alfred is a descendant of JOHN GRAHAM 1876. Anyone can see that the inference is that 1876 is the start of the tree and that subsequent families lead down to Alfred. If Gordon had bothered to check with me first instead of airing his misunderstanding of the situation on the list the matter would have been made clear to him. Regards,William ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gordon Evans" <gordon.w.evans@btinternet.com> To: <eng-merseyside@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 8:21 AM Subject: Re: [ENG-MERSEYSIDE] ALFRED GRAHAM > Hi Walter > > The reason I thought I'd given you the wrong family was because of William > in Adelaide's statement :- > >>I have the above ALFRED in my tree descended from JOHN GRAHAM >1876 >>Ireland. >>Relevant tree has been sent offlist for you information > > whereas the Liscard greengrocer from the 1901 Census I suggested to you > was the son of Albert GRAHAM b1852 Liverpool? > > Regards > Gordon > > From: "WALTER JONES" <alsrecs@btopenworld.com> > To: <eng-merseyside@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 7:07 PM > Subject: Re: [ENG-MERSEYSIDE] ALFRED GRAHAM > >>Hello Gordon, Cousin. >>The reason for not saying anything about the "Wrong >>Family" was, it wasn't, that is the family I have, and to be honest, I >>don't know how all this started? I think I must have missed something, but >>it is a problem I've found with Emails, as it is so easy to pick things up >>wrongly. >>Anyway enough of that, the info:- you sent was well >>received, and the only problem I can see up to now with Williams, is it >>seems as though one of us, probably me, seems to have taken a wrong fork >>somewhere, but it'll get sorted, I hope. >>Take Care. >>Walter, Scotland. >> >>Gordon Evans <gordon.w.evans@btinternet.com> wrote: >>Hello Walter >>Would be interested to know whether I had in fact given you the wrong >>GRAHAM >>family in my earlier posting, as intimated by William in Adelaide. >>If so, I'm rather surprised you didn't mention this in your reply thanking >>me for the information? >>I'm quite thick-skinned, so can take a "knock". :-) >>Regards >>Gordon > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-MERSEYSIDE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Walter wrote :- >Also I have connections to Alfred and John GRAHAM, who in 1901 I >believe >had a Greengrocers business in Liscard or thereabouts. >I look forward to any replies. >Walter Jones. According to the 1901 Census this Alfred was aged 23, so born c1876 in Liverpool. William wrote :- >Alfred is a descendant of JOHN GRAHAM 1876. Anyone can see that >the >inference is that 1876 is the start of the tree and that subsequent >families >lead down to Alfred. Am I the really the only one having difficulty following this? :-) Gordon From: "William" <wgra0331@bigpond.net.au> To: <eng-merseyside@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 9:55 PM Subject: Re: [ENG-MERSEYSIDE] ALFRED GRAHAM >Hi Walter >If this has to be an 'open book' there is nothing wrong with my statement >that Alfred is a descendant of JOHN GRAHAM 1876. Anyone can see >that the >inference is that 1876 is the start of the tree and that subsequent >families >lead down to Alfred. >If Gordon had bothered to check with me first instead of airing his >misunderstanding of the situation on the list the matter would have been >made clear to him. >Regards,William