RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [ENG-MAN] HULMES/WATERWORTH BRICK WALL
    2. Is this your family? 1871 England Census 1871 England Census Name: Charles Hulmes Age: 30 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1841 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Jane Gender: Male Where born: Manchester, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Salford Ecclesiastical parish: St Bartholomew Town: Salford County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street address: Occupation: Condition as to marriage: Disability: View Image Registration district: Salford Sub registration district: Regent Road ED, institution, or vessel: 12 Household schedule number: 71 Household Members: Name Age Charles Hulmes 30 Charles Hulmes 6 Edward Hulmes 3 months Jane Hulmes 29 Mary Hulmes 7 Robert Hulmes 3 William Hulmes 4 Source Citation: Class: RG10; Piece: 4022; Folio: 108; Page: 11; GSU roll: 846322. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rose Hulmes" <rhulmes@btinternet.com> To: <ENG-MANCHESTER@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:11 PM Subject: [ENG-MAN] HULMES/WATERWORTH BRICK WALL > I've hit a brick wall with the following and wonder if anyone fancies a > challenge. I've searched the census returns high and low with all sorts of > variations, but I'm coming up with nothing solid. Any help/suggestions > would be much appreciated. > > Charles Hulmes born c.1839 Manchester, occupation Carter - Married Jane > Murray 1860 Manchester. Both aged 21 years. Father, Robert Hulmes, > occupation Painter. > I found Charles on 1861 census at 12 Smiths Building, Blackfriars with > Jane. > Cannot find Charles or Robert on 1851 or 1841 census. > > George Waterworth born c.1844, occupation Boatman or Waterman - Married > Sarah Roach Nov.1863 at Manchester Cathedral. Father also George > Waterworth, occupation farmer. > I can't find George on any of the census returns. His poor wife Sarah was > in Salford Workhouse in 1871 with a new born son and her two other > children were residing with her father Joseph Roach in Salford. She then > went on to have two more children in 1882 and 1884. I have found Sarah on > all the census, but there is no sign of George on any of them. When she > was in the workhouse in 1871, her marital status was m. so he wasn't > deceased. > > Help please!!! > > > > > > > ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ > > Except for personal messages, please post replies to the list. > Other people can learn from them! > > ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-MANCHESTER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    06/27/2008 10:50:51