Hi William, I have found record 125 of the burial register and the information is the same,died on the 28th buried on the 29th July 1801 Occupation land waiter lived in Kirkdale aged 51 cause of death `Decline ` Record 124 is on the previous page and is for a different individual. Kirkdale is today a district of Liverpool, in 1801 it wasn't part of Liverpool but was a part of the Hundred of West Derby an ancient area of Lancashire and a much bigger area than Liverpool. Can you let me know if record 124 was from the original burial register or a transcription ?. Regards Will Roberts Fontaine Wiatt <f.wiatt@yahoo.com> wrote: > >Would someone look at a couple of records for me and confirm what I think I see. > > >With Ancestry I found the burial record of Francis Wiatt and Francis Wiat. Same person, two different records. He (age 51) was buried in 1801 in Liverpool. > >My question is: Looking at the actual records - I can’t make out exactly what it says - but it looks like he died on 28 July 1801 and was buried on 29 July. > > >Francis Wiat is record # 124 – Middle left > >Francis Wiatt is record # 125 – Top left > > > > >Does anyone else agree ? > > > >And both say Kirkdale. Is that a place – On the record for Francis Wiatt it looks like the column is "where he was from" ? > > > >Thank you, > >William Wiatt > > >~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > >Admin Message - List guidelines: >http://freespace.virgin.net/genealogical.collections/AdminMessage.htm > >The list admin can be contacted at >Eng-Liverpool-admin@rootsweb.com > >Buy or sell family research items on the GEN-MAT-UKI mailing list. No fees! >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LIVERPOOL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message