RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 6440/10000
    1. [LIN] unsubsribe
    2. Karen - Skarlettnoire Labels
    3. unsubsribe

    07/02/2012 08:16:08
    1. Re: [LIN] SAMUEL TINDALL CHRISTENED 1737.
    2. Sara Reid
    3. I found Samuel and Jane's marriage easily in the Carlton Le Moorlands parish registers so thought I'd have a look for his baptism to get his parents' names. Since the marriage record shows that he was of the parish of Lincoln and you mentioned St Mary's Lincoln I tried the relevant years in both St Mary Magdalene and St Mary le Wigford parish, but with no luck so going through the registers for all the other Lincoln parishes is probably your best option. Where did you find his baptism record? I'm surprised that there was no reference to his parents. I had a look on familysearch and wonder whether you meant St Martin's rather than St Mary's. I couldn't see him on the images of the pages for the relevant years there either, so it looks like a lot of squinting at the images in the window on the lincstothepast website may be your best way forward unless you've had more helpful suggestions from other members. Sara -----Original Message----- From: norma jean mcewin [mailto:norma_jean@fastmail.com.au] Sent: 02 July 2012 02:43 To: englin Subject: [LIN] SAMUEL TINDALL CHRISTENED 1737. Can anybody please tell me where to look for his parents. He was married in 1762 Carlton Le Moorlands to Jane Lilly. Last child born 1777 in St Marys Lincoln. I have all his children christening records from Familysearch . There is another Samuel born 1738 on other people ancestry trees but I am sure that is not him. Norma South Australia Australia -- norma jean mcewin norma_jean@fastmail.com.au -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service

    07/02/2012 07:40:36
    1. Re: [LIN] Fw: Your senior project
    2. Louis Mills
    3. Hi, Rita,     This is a good question.  It seems you would have to know the name, or at least the location, of the hotel and find it in the census.  I find that the easiest way is to use the Historical Directories that are online, then to lookup the ostler's name.  Generally they slept in the hotel, then that gives me the page with all the names on it.        Lou ________________________________ From: Rita Effnert <kessie3@online.de> To: Louis Mills <louis_mills@att.net>; eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 1:08 AM Subject: Re: [LIN] Fw: Your senior project Am 02.07.2012 00:51, schrieb Louis Mills: Hi, Missing Lincs,     Still looking for a Senior Project" to help the list?  How about providing a list of everyone staying at a hotel in one of our towns during the census.  I know that Grantham and Caistor had hotels.  I'm pretty sure that Lincoln and Grantham had some, too.  Who was staying at an inn and where were they from?         Lou How would I go about doing this? Rita in Germany ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >Eingehende eMail ist virenfrei. Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de Version: 9.0.930 / Virendatenbank: 2437.1.1/5104 - Ausgabedatum: 07/01/12 08:34:00

    07/02/2012 07:22:45
    1. Re: [LIN] Teats and Balms
    2. Louis Mills
    3. Hi, Sara,     When you say the word "blacksmith" many people think of the farrier, the guy who shod horses.  But I have an ancestor who was a blacksmith down in Surrey and he primarily worked the barge trade, making fittings for the barges,  In his senior years he listed himself as a Whitesmith, probably because he could make more money repairing pewter drinking cups.  Or maybe he just thought it made him sound like a better class of metal worker, who knows?     I know that Lincolnshire had a lot of barge trade on the rivers and canals, but a blacksmith may have also worked on the railroads and on the new steam engines that came into use in the early 1800s.     Good luck with your search.         Lou (list admin.) ----- Original Message ----- From: Sara Reid <sara.reid.cymru@gmail.com> To: ENG-LINCSGEN@rootsweb.com Cc: Sent: Monday, July 2, 2012 4:56 AM Subject: [LIN] Teats and Balms I'm new to this list and to this way of contacting other family historians, so forgive me if I don't get the etiquette right. My main interests in Lincs are the TEAT family of Ancaster (and possibly Ropsley according to family legend, although my research suggests it was only for a relatively brief period they were there) and the BALM family who also lived in villages surrounding Grantham (Great Gonerby, Welby, Bassingthorpe, Lavington/Lenton (abode was Hanby), Ingoldsby (Scotland specifically) and for a short time Deeping Fen). On the Teat side confidence in the reliability of what I've found ends with John Teat, smith and farrier, born abt 1760 (not absolutely sure where) who lived in Ropsley during the last decade of the 18th Century and then moved to Ancaster where he had what seems like a thriving business with more than one forge. Things seem to go downhill over the next couple of generations although being a blacksmith remains a family tradition - his grandson, Charles Teat, is in the Workhouse in Newark in 1911 and his great grandson had already walked hundreds of miles to find work in Essex shipyards.  There are a few other Teat families in Lincs at that time (Bourne and Castle Bytham mainly), but not many so I'd imagine that they are related in some way. I have information going back a lot further for the Balms, although a missing generation or two of info is causing me problems.  They were farmers and seem to have moved as a family group (several generations/extended family) at the same time.  They were in Welby around 1650 - 1720ish; Great Gonerby until 1802; Bassingthorpe until 1823; then Hanby until at least 1832.  By the 1841 census they are in the part of Ingoldsby known as Scotland.  From there they move for a while to Deeping Fen (1851 census), then back to Ingoldsby (1861 Census - resident not visiting) and from there to Farnham/Snape, Suffolk for a couple of years and on to Alresford Essex where John William Balm is stationmaster by 1870 (according to sons' baptism records). After many generations as tenant farmers (I'm assuming - have some evidence that they farmed land belonging to Sir William Manners) the family trade changes to being working on the railways.  I have some sketchy info from the time before they appear in the Welby Parish Registers (mainly from Ropsley), but it isn't strong enough for me to be able to make definite connections.  Spelling of the name does vary (Balme, Baulme, Baume, Bawlm etc) and while it is clearly quite an unusual name I haven't ruled out that some of the other Balms went on to use one of the variations so the 16th century Balms I've found may not even be the ancestors of the 18th century Balms.  Any ideas or relevant info much appreciated! I think I need to brush up on Lincolnshire social and agricultural history for more ideas as well. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/02/2012 07:16:25
    1. [LIN] Teats and Balms
    2. Sara Reid
    3. I'm new to this list and to this way of contacting other family historians, so forgive me if I don't get the etiquette right. My main interests in Lincs are the TEAT family of Ancaster (and possibly Ropsley according to family legend, although my research suggests it was only for a relatively brief period they were there) and the BALM family who also lived in villages surrounding Grantham (Great Gonerby, Welby, Bassingthorpe, Lavington/Lenton (abode was Hanby), Ingoldsby (Scotland specifically) and for a short time Deeping Fen). On the Teat side confidence in the reliability of what I've found ends with John Teat, smith and farrier, born abt 1760 (not absolutely sure where) who lived in Ropsley during the last decade of the 18th Century and then moved to Ancaster where he had what seems like a thriving business with more than one forge. Things seem to go downhill over the next couple of generations although being a blacksmith remains a family tradition - his grandson, Charles Teat, is in the Workhouse in Newark in 1911 and his great grandson had already walked hundreds of miles to find work in Essex shipyards. There are a few other Teat families in Lincs at that time (Bourne and Castle Bytham mainly), but not many so I'd imagine that they are related in some way. I have information going back a lot further for the Balms, although a missing generation or two of info is causing me problems. They were farmers and seem to have moved as a family group (several generations/extended family) at the same time. They were in Welby around 1650 - 1720ish; Great Gonerby until 1802; Bassingthorpe until 1823; then Hanby until at least 1832. By the 1841 census they are in the part of Ingoldsby known as Scotland. From there they move for a while to Deeping Fen (1851 census), then back to Ingoldsby (1861 Census - resident not visiting) and from there to Farnham/Snape, Suffolk for a couple of years and on to Alresford Essex where John William Balm is stationmaster by 1870 (according to sons' baptism records). After many generations as tenant farmers (I'm assuming - have some evidence that they farmed land belonging to Sir William Manners) the family trade changes to being working on the railways. I have some sketchy info from the time before they appear in the Welby Parish Registers (mainly from Ropsley), but it isn't strong enough for me to be able to make definite connections. Spelling of the name does vary (Balme, Baulme, Baume, Bawlm etc) and while it is clearly quite an unusual name I haven't ruled out that some of the other Balms went on to use one of the variations so the 16th century Balms I've found may not even be the ancestors of the 18th century Balms. Any ideas or relevant info much appreciated! I think I need to brush up on Lincolnshire social and agricultural history for more ideas as well.

    07/02/2012 06:56:42
    1. Re: [LIN] Colored Paper
    2. Carol Lylyk
    3. The LDS Family History Centre here in Calgary have sheets of yellow transparent film to use over the microfilm reader screens. They do help quite a bit for images that are hard to read. Carol Lylyk Calgary Canada ----- Original Message ----- From: <vjspringer@aol.com> To: <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 2:18 AM Subject: [LIN] Colored Paper > > Hi, > > I taught school for a number of years. The Special Ed teaher carried around > a packet of various colored film sheets that > were used by some of the pupils. They could read books with the film when it > was difficult to read the book otherwise. The color varied with the students > so one has to try several to see which is best for them.These packets were > sold where Special Ed supplies were sold. There were other students who could > read a page better if the printing was white on black rather than black on > white. I don't know if any of this will help with films but it is worth a > try. > > Velma > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2437/5105 - Release Date: 07/01/12 >

    07/02/2012 06:18:04
    1. Re: [LIN] Fw: Your senior project
    2. Rita Effnert
    3. Am 02.07.2012 00:51, schrieb Louis Mills: > Hi, Missing Lincs, > > > Still looking for a Senior Project" to help the list? How about providing a list of everyone staying at a hotel in one of our towns during the census. I know that Grantham and Caistor had hotels. I'm pretty sure that Lincoln and Grantham had some, too. Who was staying at an inn and where were they from? > > Lou > How would I go about doing this? Rita in Germany > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > Eingehende eMail ist virenfrei. > Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de > Version: 9.0.930 / Virendatenbank: 2437.1.1/5104 - Ausgabedatum: 07/01/12 08:34:00 >

    07/02/2012 04:08:45
    1. Re: [LIN] Admin note: July theme
    2. Michael Wells
    3. I often use the term "Without benefit of clergy"!! Mike  The theme for July is:  Bastards We've all got them in our trees.  It's not their fault they have that term applied to them.  I usually reserve that term for certain adults who behave in socially unacceptable ways.  But I've got some children in MY trees who were born without the benefit of married parents.  Those are a LOT EASIER to spot than the ones born into a marriage, but where the father is not the male of the pair.  That's why DNA testing is sometimes a surprise. So let's find those poor boys and girls who are born to "single moms".  Let's see if you can find them in a record where you haven't looked before. The burden of life may have been hard for some of the males.  They were often excluded from inheritance, and sometimes excluded from their own mother.  Tell us their tales.     Lou (list admin.) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/02/2012 01:21:37
    1. [LIN] Colored Paper
    2. Hi, I taught school for a number of years. The Special Ed teaher carried around a packet of various colored film sheets that were used by some of the pupils. They could read books with the film when it was difficult to read the book otherwise. The color varied with the students so one has to try several to see which is best for them.These packets were sold where Special Ed supplies were sold. There were other students who could read a page better if the printing was white on black rather than black on white. I don't know if any of this will help with films but it is worth a try. Velma

    07/01/2012 10:18:03
    1. Re: [LIN] Posting Interests
    2. Beverley Hill
    3. John Don't know if you have these Baptism Record Jemima Harriet Husted Wakefield, All Saints 27 Dec 1865 James Henry Husted, Elizabeth Husted View Record Esther Husted 25 Apr 1867 Wakefield, All Saints 29 Dec 1867 James Henry Husted, Elizabeth Husted -----Original Message----- From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of The Mannings Sent: 01 July 2012 06:00 To: ENG-LINCSGEN@rootsweb.com Cc: ENG-LIN-LINCOLN@rootsweb.com Subject: [LIN] Posting Interests Researching the following, with not much success so far. BUTTSUME, Elizabeth born Lincolnshire cir 1838, married James HUSTED at some stage and appears on the 1881 Census as being Head of Household in Leeds, Yorkshire. If anybody is researching these families they should feel free to contact me off list. Best wishes, John. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/01/2012 01:36:42
    1. Re: [LIN] Posting Interests
    2. Beverley Hill
    3. John Found this on Yorkshire BMD Yorkshire Birth indexes for the years: 1865 Surname Forename(s) Sub-District Registers At Mother's Maiden Name Reference HUSTED (girl) Daughter Of James Henry Wakefield Wakefield HART WFD/32/35 Bev -----Original Message----- From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Alan R Moorhouse Sent: 01 July 2012 07:35 To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LIN] Posting Interests Hello John,   >From Free BMD James Henry HUSTED married Elizabeth HART Dec q 1858 Farringdon RD 2c 553.   They were in Bethnal Green in 1861 (RG9 255 f91); James was a toll collector born Lambeth ~ 1832   James Henry HUSTED died age 36 Jun q 1869 Boston RD 7a 243.   Elizabeth HUSTED widow beer seller is in Northampton in 1871 (RG10 1487 f5).    As you indicated Elizabeth BUTTSUME is at Leeds in 1881, with 5 year old Walter HUSTED born Wakefield but there is no birth for him in Free BMD.   Elizabeth says she is born: Lincolnshire Buscott (1881 census) - this is no doubt an enumerators error as Lincolnshire was the county of birth of her next listed child Buscott, Gloucestershire (1871 census) - this is very clearly written Buscott? Berkshire (1861 census)   There is a Buscot Park near Farringdon (Oxfordshire) http://www.buscot-park.com/   I think you might want to check out Elizabeth PARKER widow born Buscott , Berkshire at Leeds in 1891 (RG12 3700 f.12) with son Walter PARKER age 15 born Wakefield.   >From Free BMD there is an Elizabeth HUSTED who married Charles PARKER or William TURNER Sep q 1871 Northampton RD.  There is a Walter PARKER born Dec q 1875 Wakefield RD on Free BMD.   I can't see an obvious death for Charles PARKER betrween 1871 and 1881.  There is a possible death for Elizabeth PARKER age 57 Sep q 1895 Leeds RD.   Can't offer an opinion as to why Elizabeth has the surname BUTTSUME in 1881 and I think the only Lincolnshire connection you have is that daughter Elizabeth A HUSTED was born at Boston, Lincolnshire ~ 1863 and husband James died in Lincolnshire in 1869.   I have no personal interest in these families!   Alan Moorhouse Stroud, Gloucestershire --- On Sun, 1/7/12, The Mannings <manning.jade@xtra.co.nz> wrote: From: The Mannings <manning.jade@xtra.co.nz> Subject: [LIN] Posting Interests To: ENG-LINCSGEN@rootsweb.com Cc: ENG-LIN-LINCOLN@rootsweb.com Date: Sunday, 1 July, 2012, 6:00 Researching the following, with not much success so far. BUTTSUME, Elizabeth born Lincolnshire cir 1838, married James HUSTED at some stage and appears on the 1881 Census as being Head of Household in Leeds, Yorkshire. If anybody is researching these families they should feel free to contact me off list. Best wishes, John. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/01/2012 01:31:50
    1. [LIN] SAMUEL TINDALL CHRISTENED 1737.
    2. norma jean mcewin
    3. Can anybody please tell me where to look for his parents. He was married in 1762 Carlton Le Moorlands to Jane Lilly. Last child born 1777 in St Marys Lincoln. I have all his children christening records from Familysearch . There is another Samuel born 1738 on other people ancestry trees but I am sure that is not him. Norma South Australia Australia -- norma jean mcewin norma_jean@fastmail.com.au -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service

    07/01/2012 12:42:34
    1. [LIN] Posting Interests
    2. The Mannings
    3. Researching the following, with not much success so far. BUTTSUME, Elizabeth born Lincolnshire cir 1838, married James HUSTED at some stage and appears on the 1881 Census as being Head of Household in Leeds, Yorkshire. If anybody is researching these families they should feel free to contact me off list. Best wishes, John.

    07/01/2012 11:00:29
    1. [LIN] Fw: Your senior project
    2. Louis Mills
    3. Hi, Missing Lincs,     Still looking for a Senior Project" to help the list?  How about providing a list of everyone staying at a hotel in one of our towns during the census.  I know that Grantham and Caistor had hotels.  I'm pretty sure that Lincoln and Grantham had some, too.  Who was staying at an inn and where were they from?         Lou

    07/01/2012 09:51:30
    1. Re: [LIN] Hugh Crosby and Mary Dawson - a complication?
    2. Louis Mills
    3. I always take a couple of sheets of coloured paper with me when I'm reading microifilm.  For some reason, using something other than a pure white surface makes some films easier to read.  Sometimes it's yellow, sometimes a light blue.  I think it has something to do with the colour receptors in our eyes.     Lou

    07/01/2012 09:12:13
    1. Re: [LIN] Hugh Crosby and Mary Dawson - a complication?
    2. Jan Moon
    3. Thanks PamWell I'll take it that the Freereg transcription is in error (I've done transcribing, and I know how hard it is with some of the images) I had tried to find it on Freereg before, but it was the date that found it, without Lincs to the Past I wouldn't have had anything. I was just lucky that the LTTP image was pretty clear and that you have good eyesight. Thanks againJan > Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 04:49:34 +0100 > From: pam@five-oaks.co.uk > To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [LIN] Hugh Crosby and Mary Dawson - a complication? > > My guess is that the image the FreeREG transcriber was looking at wasn't > too clear. > If you look at the transcription of the witnesses' names, three of the > four names are basically blank. > If you look at the Lincs to the Past online register entry the > witnesses' names are quite clear - Ephraim Eastgate and Susanna Buckberry. > > I've known instances where I've looked at a record, for instance on film > at a LDS FHC and the entries have been quite legible, and then I've > looked at it on a fiche at another place and it's been very blurred. > I've also had times when I've been able to read an entry without any > problems - but when I've looked at it again (perhaps only a week later) > I've gone 'huh?' because it looks nothing like my transcription. <g> > > Always remember that a transcription is one person's interpretation of > what is written. > It is not necessarily correct. (And I can assure you that even the most > experienced transcribers make mistakes.) That is why every time anyone > refers to a transcription they always say 'but you should check the > original for yourself'. > You have the PR entry in front of you. *You* transcribe it. > Does it look like Hugh or Isack? > Is the written date twenty six(th) or twenty eight? > > Sometimes, however hard you or anyone else tries, it's impossible to > decide exactly what has been written and you have to record the entry as > 'I think it's ..... but it might be.....'. > > Pam > Proud to be a member of Lincolnshire Family History Society > http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk/ > > > > On 01/07/2012 03:51, Jan Moon wrote: > > > > > > > > Further to my looking for this couples marriage in Lincs to the Past, I decided to check if they were in Freereg and I think I found them - well her name is right, Mary Dawson; thr Register no is 13 same in Lincs to the Past; but the groom's name has changed to Isack - the date is 2 days out, but maybe the date in Lincs to the Past was 26 instead of 28? Comments/advice appreciatedJan > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > -- > Proud to be a member of Lincolnshire Family History Society > http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk/ > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/01/2012 08:31:48
    1. [LIN] Hugh Crosby and Mary Dawson - a complication?
    2. Jan Moon
    3. Further to my looking for this couples marriage in Lincs to the Past, I decided to check if they were in Freereg and I think I found them - well her name is right, Mary Dawson; thr Register no is 13 same in Lincs to the Past; but the groom's name has changed to Isack - the date is 2 days out, but maybe the date in Lincs to the Past was 26 instead of 28? Comments/advice appreciatedJan

    07/01/2012 07:21:12
    1. [LIN] Admin note: July theme
    2. Louis Mills
    3. The theme for July is:  Bastards We've all got them in our trees.  It's not their fault they have that term applied to them.  I usually reserve that term for certain adults who behave in socially unacceptable ways.  But I've got some children in MY trees who were born without the benefit of married parents.  Those are a LOT EASIER to spot than the ones born into a marriage, but where the father is not the male of the pair.  That's why DNA testing is sometimes a surprise. So let's find those poor boys and girls who are born to "single moms".  Let's see if you can find them in a record where you haven't looked before. The burden of life may have been hard for some of the males.  They were often excluded from inheritance, and sometimes excluded from their own mother.  Tell us their tales.     Lou (list admin.)

    07/01/2012 06:08:42
    1. Re: [LIN] Posting Interests
    2. Alan R Moorhouse
    3. Hello John, >From Free BMD James Henry HUSTED married Elizabeth HART Dec q 1858 Farringdon RD 2c 553. They were in Bethnal Green in 1861 (RG9 255 f91); James was a toll collector born Lambeth ~ 1832 James Henry HUSTED died age 36 Jun q 1869 Boston RD 7a 243. Elizabeth HUSTED widow beer seller is in Northampton in 1871 (RG10 1487 f5). As you indicated Elizabeth BUTTSUME is at Leeds in 1881, with 5 year old Walter HUSTED born Wakefield but there is no birth for him in Free BMD. Elizabeth says she is born: Lincolnshire Buscott (1881 census) - this is no doubt an enumerators error as Lincolnshire was the county of birth of her next listed child Buscott, Gloucestershire (1871 census) - this is very clearly written Buscott? Berkshire (1861 census) There is a Buscot Park near Farringdon (Oxfordshire) http://www.buscot-park.com/ I think you might want to check out Elizabeth PARKER widow born Buscott , Berkshire at Leeds in 1891 (RG12 3700 f.12) with son Walter PARKER age 15 born Wakefield. >From Free BMD there is an Elizabeth HUSTED who married Charles PARKER or William TURNER Sep q 1871 Northampton RD. There is a Walter PARKER born Dec q 1875 Wakefield RD on Free BMD. I can't see an obvious death for Charles PARKER betrween 1871 and 1881. There is a possible death for Elizabeth PARKER age 57 Sep q 1895 Leeds RD. Can't offer an opinion as to why Elizabeth has the surname BUTTSUME in 1881 and I think the only Lincolnshire connection you have is that daughter Elizabeth A HUSTED was born at Boston, Lincolnshire ~ 1863 and husband James died in Lincolnshire in 1869. I have no personal interest in these families! Alan Moorhouse Stroud, Gloucestershire --- On Sun, 1/7/12, The Mannings <manning.jade@xtra.co.nz> wrote: From: The Mannings <manning.jade@xtra.co.nz> Subject: [LIN] Posting Interests To: ENG-LINCSGEN@rootsweb.com Cc: ENG-LIN-LINCOLN@rootsweb.com Date: Sunday, 1 July, 2012, 6:00 Researching the following, with not much success so far. BUTTSUME, Elizabeth born Lincolnshire cir 1838, married James HUSTED at some stage and appears on the 1881 Census as being Head of Household in Leeds, Yorkshire. If anybody is researching these families they should feel free to contact me off list. Best wishes, John. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/01/2012 01:37:20
    1. Re: [LIN] Posting Interests
    2. Alan R Moorhouse
    3. Hello John,   >From Free BMD James Henry HUSTED married Elizabeth HART Dec q 1858 Farringdon RD 2c 553.   They were in Bethnal Green in 1861 (RG9 255 f91); James was a toll collector born Lambeth ~ 1832   James Henry HUSTED died age 36 Jun q 1869 Boston RD 7a 243.   Elizabeth HUSTED widow beer seller is in Northampton in 1871 (RG10 1487 f5).    As you indicated Elizabeth BUTTSUME is at Leeds in 1881, with 5 year old Walter HUSTED born Wakefield but there is no birth for him in Free BMD.   Elizabeth says she is born: Lincolnshire Buscott (1881 census) - this is no doubt an enumerators error as Lincolnshire was the county of birth of her next listed child Buscott, Gloucestershire (1871 census) - this is very clearly written Buscott? Berkshire (1861 census)   There is a Buscot Park near Farringdon (Oxfordshire) http://www.buscot-park.com/   I think you might want to check out Elizabeth PARKER widow born Buscott , Berkshire at Leeds in 1891 (RG12 3700 f.12) with son Walter PARKER age 15 born Wakefield.   >From Free BMD there is an Elizabeth HUSTED who married Charles PARKER or William TURNER Sep q 1871 Northampton RD.  There is a Walter PARKER born Dec q 1875 Wakefield RD on Free BMD.   I can't see an obvious death for Charles PARKER betrween 1871 and 1881.  There is a possible death for Elizabeth PARKER age 57 Sep q 1895 Leeds RD.   Can't offer an opinion as to why Elizabeth has the surname BUTTSUME in 1881 and I think the only Lincolnshire connection you have is that daughter Elizabeth A HUSTED was born at Boston, Lincolnshire ~ 1863 and husband James died in Lincolnshire in 1869.   I have no personal interest in these families!   Alan Moorhouse Stroud, Gloucestershire --- On Sun, 1/7/12, The Mannings <manning.jade@xtra.co.nz> wrote: From: The Mannings <manning.jade@xtra.co.nz> Subject: [LIN] Posting Interests To: ENG-LINCSGEN@rootsweb.com Cc: ENG-LIN-LINCOLN@rootsweb.com Date: Sunday, 1 July, 2012, 6:00 Researching the following, with not much success so far. BUTTSUME, Elizabeth born Lincolnshire cir 1838, married James HUSTED at some stage and appears on the 1881 Census as being Head of Household in Leeds, Yorkshire. If anybody is researching these families they should feel free to contact me off list. Best wishes, John. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/01/2012 01:34:44