Hi, Missing Lincs, If you do get a chance to have that visit with Aunt Elizabeth to discuss her memories of your relatives, please talk in a normal, clear voice. For some reason people who visit older relatives seem to assume that the relative is deaf (or, worse: a little child). I have seen people practically shouting because they thought their relative couldn't hear them. Perhaps you don't speak clearly. And I have seen people talk to elders in a sing-song voice, like they were talking to a small child. So don't insult Aunt Elizabeth. She may have set aside her hearing aides, or she may have a mild dementia that makes it hard for her to focus, but treat her like an adult, please. Now, if you've been a member of this list for years, and you are STUCK, let us help you get started. Tell us about one of your Lincolnshire relatives, even if they are way off the ancestral tree. Let us help you to pin down this person. After all, isn't that what this list is for? Go find that pile of paper you've been thinking of moving and see if it holds a Lincolnshire relative somewhere within the pile. Fiona, I KNOW you've got a pile or two to work on. Lou (list admin.)

http://ukga.org/cgi-bin/browse.cgi?action=ViewRec&DB=8&bookID=41&page=vii&submit=Next : Well worth the visit. Bart.

Hi, Missing Lincs, I know that this is "marriage month", because I just heard that an event had to be pushed back to July this year because the facility we normally meet at is booked-up for wedding this month. Well, I wish them all bliss and long happiness together. But this month, I want you to do two things: 1. Wipe down that computer with a chemical wipe. When it is OFF. Get the keyboard and mouse clean. You should do this to your phone from time-to-time. 2. Interview Aunt Elizabeth. Ask her about the village she lived in when she was ten. Where was the school? Did she have to relocate during WWII? Where did she meet her husband? You know the drill. If she lived in Lincolnshire, it's OK to share some of those facts with us on this list. I would encourage you to record the interview, just so you can play it back later. Oh, did I interrupt your backup? Sorry. Never hurts to back things up. Get hopping! Aunt Elizabeth isn't getting any younger. Lou (list admin.)

Hello: According to this post here from primary record : http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/ENG-LINCSGEN/2000-10/0972133981 : And ‘The English Baronetage’ : https://books.google.co.za/books?id=SY9cAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA334 : Rebecca Markham bp:26-01-1642, St. Lawrence, Sedgebrook, Lincolnshire, dg of Robert Markham m. Rebecca Hussey, per primary record: It must therefore run true that this is an error in the Baronetage (?). [MARKEHAM Rebecca spinster aged abt.23 of Sedgebrook & Thomas Heber gent aged abt.22 of Stainton in the parish of Gargrave, Yorks. At Sedgebrook or Grantham. 16 Jul 1668. Alleg4/37-8 MB1668/84]. Film Number:1937935 : https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NN2S-5J7 : Thomas Hebar m:18-07-Jul 1668, Lincoln Rebeccah Markham : Precisely which church would this have been in ?. Under same Film Number: https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NN2S-LQ3 : Is there any indication of age or parents for Frances Markham (m. Stephen Bamford) ?. Cheers – Bart [!!!] .... =====================

Hi Bart You can look at the scans of the baptism register for Sedgebrook (in Lincolnshire) for 1599 onwards on the Lincs to the Past website. http://www.lincstothepast.com/Records/RecordDisplayTranscript.aspx?oid=743117&iid=343987 it includes both dates. I find the 1600 entry illegible, but you may have more luck. It's image 21, when you find the correct register. However, in clear text in image 42 in the same book, underneath an entry '1643' and possible 'Christmas', there is a report of Robert Markham son of Robert Markham Baronet of Newark December. It has been overwritten, I think, some time in the past, and the rest of the page is illegible (to me). Good luck- maybe your eyesight (or patience) is better than mine. Margaret On 30/05/2016 22:10, Bart Simon via wrote: > Hello: > > Robert Markham of Sedgebrook (Bt.1): According to book value, he was (b:1600 in Whitsun-week: 7th Sunday after Easter) (1600.04.02 (Sun): 21-27.05.1600 7th Sunday ?) I assume in Sedgebrook. Is there a bp/chr record for him ?. > > Robert Markham of Sedgebrook (Bt.2): chr:10-12-1643: Was this in Newark or Sedgebrook, Lincolnshire ?. > > Cheers - Bart. > ============== > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello: Robert Markham of Sedgebrook (Bt.1): According to book value, he was (b:1600 in Whitsun-week: 7th Sunday after Easter) (1600.04.02 (Sun): 21-27.05.1600 7th Sunday ?) I assume in Sedgebrook. Is there a bp/chr record for him ?. Robert Markham of Sedgebrook (Bt.2): chr:10-12-1643: Was this in Newark or Sedgebrook, Lincolnshire ?. Cheers - Bart. ==============

Silly me, you gave me the name! I found this: 93 In Loving Memory of a devoted husband, dad, and Grandad Walter Frederick Allbones 12.2.35-17.3.99 aged 64 years. We plough the fields and scatter the good seed on the land. Vase Grandad. There will be a plan of the cemetery on the CD which will show where the MI was. There are several other Allbones on the CD. Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html http://duncalfonenamestudy.tribalpages.com/ Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk -----Original Message----- From: eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:eng-lincsgen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Pat Horton via Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 2:55 PM To: Anne Cole; eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LIN] Lincolnshire Post 1837 marriage index - updates Hi Anne - do you know whether the MIs for Brigg Cemetery are readily available for a visitor from New Zealand to access. She is only in this area for another day. They were told the plot numbers A38 and A39 but could not find a headstone. Possibly never been one there but it would be nice for her to be able to check the records if possible. The family are Allbones (may be Albones) and Walter apparently went to New Zealand exporting weasels and stoats in an effort to control the rabbit population there. This was all news to me as we have recently had an exhibition at the Brigg Heritage Centre on the rabbit trade and I have never had a sniff of this type of information. Quite a fascinating lady who has come over from New Zealand to try to further her research. She is related to Walter who was from Brigg. Pat Horton Brigg Heritage Centre volunteer. ----Original message---- >From : eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Date : 22/05/2016 - 10:32 (GMTST) To : eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Cc : goons@rootsweb.com Subject : [LIN] Lincolnshire Post 1837 marriage index - updates The following have been added to the index: Lincoln Registration District (Rural parishes) All 1871-1911 unless otherwise stated: Metheringham, Navenby, Nettleham, Nocton, Normanby by Spital, North Carlton, North Hykeham, Owmby by Spital, Potterhanworth, Rand, Reepham, Riseholme, Saxby cum Owmby, Saxilby to Sep 1911 - next register missing, Scampton, Scothern and Skellingthorpe. 9,141 marriages now in this spreadsheet. Horncastle Registration District - all 1851-1911 unless otherwise stated: Asgarby, Ashby Puerorum (1837-1911), Asterby, Bag Enderby (1837-1911), Baumber (register closed in 1910). Gainsborough Registration District marriage spreadsheet updated. "Northolm" had been typed into the parish column instead of "Northorpe". Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html http://duncalfonenamestudy.tribalpages.com/ Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7598 / Virus Database: 4568/12288 - Release Date: 05/24/16 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7598 / Virus Database: 4568/12288 - Release Date: 05/24/16

Hi Anne - do you know whether the MIs for Brigg Cemetery are readily available for a visitor from New Zealand to access. She is only in this area for another day. They were told the plot numbers A38 and A39 but could not find a headstone. Possibly never been one there but it would be nice for her to be able to check the records if possible. The family are Allbones (may be Albones) and Walter apparently went to New Zealand exporting weasels and stoats in an effort to control the rabbit population there. This was all news to me as we have recently had an exhibition at the Brigg Heritage Centre on the rabbit trade and I have never had a sniff of this type of information. Quite a fascinating lady who has come over from New Zealand to try to further her research. She is related to Walter who was from Brigg. Pat Horton Brigg Heritage Centre volunteer. ----Original message---- >From : eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Date : 22/05/2016 - 10:32 (GMTST) To : eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Cc : goons@rootsweb.com Subject : [LIN] Lincolnshire Post 1837 marriage index - updates The following have been added to the index: Lincoln Registration District (Rural parishes) All 1871-1911 unless otherwise stated: Metheringham, Navenby, Nettleham, Nocton, Normanby by Spital, North Carlton, North Hykeham, Owmby by Spital, Potterhanworth, Rand, Reepham, Riseholme, Saxby cum Owmby, Saxilby to Sep 1911 - next register missing, Scampton, Scothern and Skellingthorpe. 9,141 marriages now in this spreadsheet. Horncastle Registration District - all 1851-1911 unless otherwise stated: Asgarby, Ashby Puerorum (1837-1911), Asterby, Bag Enderby (1837-1911), Baumber (register closed in 1910). Gainsborough Registration District marriage spreadsheet updated. "Northolm" had been typed into the parish column instead of "Northorpe". Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html http://duncalfonenamestudy.tribalpages.com/ Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Copy of email sent to Anne but without the attachment....... Hi Anne, Job done. Steve will have to remove "copy of" from the filename when he uploads it but I am sure he will realise that. Nothing has been changed except making the same parish/church consistent in naming. Thanks for your understanding on this - it was not intended to be a criticism - I know a lot of work goes into this. Regards, Terry -----Original Message----- From: Anne Cole [mailto:duncalf@one-name.org] Sent: 23 May 2016 14:44 To: 'Terry Wells'; eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: [LIN] Lincolnshire Post 1837 marriage index - updates Hello Terry, I'm afraid I'm the culprit as I've done all the typing for Lincoln, if not all the transcriptions! By all means tidy it up and then send it back to me and I will ask Steve to replace the current file. Lincoln is now almost finished. I'll make sure I call the parishes the same thing when I type in the rest! Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk -----Original Message----- From: Terry Wells [mailto:terry.wells@talktalk.net] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 9:49 AM To: 'Anne Cole'; eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: [LIN] Lincolnshire Post 1837 marriage index - updates Thanks Anne this is very much appreciated - I use these marriage indexes a lot. I do have one minor gripe though about the Lincoln (City) RD spreadsheet - specifically Column K - Parish. I often use the sort facility in Excel to sort on a particular column other than the default Groom Surname, sometimes Year or Bride Surname. When sorting on Parish this does not work too well as different data entry people have used different descriptions e.g. "Wesley Chapel, Clasketgate, Lincoln" vs. "Clasketgate Wesleyan Chapel" also some have "Lincoln St Hughes RC" and some Lincoln St Hughes Roman Catholic". Many "St xxxxx" entries have the prefix "Lincoln" whilst some do not - all this makes sorting on Parish rather difficult as you end up with two blocks of data for the same place! This non-consistency problem could easily be solved with a few search and replace iterations. I am happy to do this if you wish. Best regards, Terry Wells -----Original Message----- From: Anne Cole [mailto:duncalf@one-name.org] Sent: 22 May 2016 10:33 To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Cc: goons@rootsweb.com Subject: [LIN] Lincolnshire Post 1837 marriage index - updates The following have been added to the index: Lincoln Registration District (Rural parishes) All 1871-1911 unless otherwise stated: Metheringham, Navenby, Nettleham, Nocton, Normanby by Spital, North Carlton, North Hykeham, Owmby by Spital, Potterhanworth, Rand, Reepham, Riseholme, Saxby cum Owmby, Saxilby to Sep 1911 - next register missing, Scampton, Scothern and Skellingthorpe. 9,141 marriages now in this spreadsheet. Horncastle Registration District - all 1851-1911 unless otherwise stated: Asgarby, Ashby Puerorum (1837-1911), Asterby, Bag Enderby (1837-1911), Baumber (register closed in 1910). Gainsborough Registration District marriage spreadsheet updated. "Northolm" had been typed into the parish column instead of "Northorpe". Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html http://duncalfonenamestudy.tribalpages.com/ Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7597 / Virus Database: 4568/12282 - Release Date: 05/23/16 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7597 / Virus Database: 4568/12282 - Release Date: 05/23/16

Hello Terry, I'm afraid I'm the culprit as I've done all the typing for Lincoln, if not all the transcriptions! By all means tidy it up and then send it back to me and I will ask Steve to replace the current file. Lincoln is now almost finished. I'll make sure I call the parishes the same thing when I type in the rest! Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk -----Original Message----- From: Terry Wells [mailto:terry.wells@talktalk.net] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 9:49 AM To: 'Anne Cole'; eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Subject: RE: [LIN] Lincolnshire Post 1837 marriage index - updates Thanks Anne this is very much appreciated - I use these marriage indexes a lot. I do have one minor gripe though about the Lincoln (City) RD spreadsheet - specifically Column K - Parish. I often use the sort facility in Excel to sort on a particular column other than the default Groom Surname, sometimes Year or Bride Surname. When sorting on Parish this does not work too well as different data entry people have used different descriptions e.g. "Wesley Chapel, Clasketgate, Lincoln" vs. "Clasketgate Wesleyan Chapel" also some have "Lincoln St Hughes RC" and some Lincoln St Hughes Roman Catholic". Many "St xxxxx" entries have the prefix "Lincoln" whilst some do not - all this makes sorting on Parish rather difficult as you end up with two blocks of data for the same place! This non-consistency problem could easily be solved with a few search and replace iterations. I am happy to do this if you wish. Best regards, Terry Wells -----Original Message----- From: Anne Cole [mailto:duncalf@one-name.org] Sent: 22 May 2016 10:33 To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Cc: goons@rootsweb.com Subject: [LIN] Lincolnshire Post 1837 marriage index - updates The following have been added to the index: Lincoln Registration District (Rural parishes) All 1871-1911 unless otherwise stated: Metheringham, Navenby, Nettleham, Nocton, Normanby by Spital, North Carlton, North Hykeham, Owmby by Spital, Potterhanworth, Rand, Reepham, Riseholme, Saxby cum Owmby, Saxilby to Sep 1911 - next register missing, Scampton, Scothern and Skellingthorpe. 9,141 marriages now in this spreadsheet. Horncastle Registration District - all 1851-1911 unless otherwise stated: Asgarby, Ashby Puerorum (1837-1911), Asterby, Bag Enderby (1837-1911), Baumber (register closed in 1910). Gainsborough Registration District marriage spreadsheet updated. "Northolm" had been typed into the parish column instead of "Northorpe". Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html http://duncalfonenamestudy.tribalpages.com/ Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7597 / Virus Database: 4568/12282 - Release Date: 05/23/16 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7597 / Virus Database: 4568/12282 - Release Date: 05/23/16

Thanks Anne this is very much appreciated - I use these marriage indexes a lot. I do have one minor gripe though about the Lincoln (City) RD spreadsheet - specifically Column K - Parish. I often use the sort facility in Excel to sort on a particular column other than the default Groom Surname, sometimes Year or Bride Surname. When sorting on Parish this does not work too well as different data entry people have used different descriptions e.g. "Wesley Chapel, Clasketgate, Lincoln" vs. "Clasketgate Wesleyan Chapel" also some have "Lincoln St Hughes RC" and some Lincoln St Hughes Roman Catholic". Many "St xxxxx" entries have the prefix "Lincoln" whilst some do not - all this makes sorting on Parish rather difficult as you end up with two blocks of data for the same place! This non-consistency problem could easily be solved with a few search and replace iterations. I am happy to do this if you wish. Best regards, Terry Wells -----Original Message----- From: Anne Cole [mailto:duncalf@one-name.org] Sent: 22 May 2016 10:33 To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Cc: goons@rootsweb.com Subject: [LIN] Lincolnshire Post 1837 marriage index - updates The following have been added to the index: Lincoln Registration District (Rural parishes) All 1871-1911 unless otherwise stated: Metheringham, Navenby, Nettleham, Nocton, Normanby by Spital, North Carlton, North Hykeham, Owmby by Spital, Potterhanworth, Rand, Reepham, Riseholme, Saxby cum Owmby, Saxilby to Sep 1911 - next register missing, Scampton, Scothern and Skellingthorpe. 9,141 marriages now in this spreadsheet. Horncastle Registration District - all 1851-1911 unless otherwise stated: Asgarby, Ashby Puerorum (1837-1911), Asterby, Bag Enderby (1837-1911), Baumber (register closed in 1910). Gainsborough Registration District marriage spreadsheet updated. "Northolm" had been typed into the parish column instead of "Northorpe". Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html http://duncalfonenamestudy.tribalpages.com/ Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk

'tis a puzzlement. I've been waiting for a response from Rootsweb myself on a mailing list issue. Our list receives about 100 spam messages daily, which are effectively trapped by the anti-spam software, but it does take a list admin's time to go thru each one to verify that the Spam is in fact Spam. I can see no obvious reason for Bart to be "de-listed". He's not a Nigerian Prince, nor is he trapped at an airport in Eastern Europe, although neither of those conditions would prevent one from being on a Rootsweb mailing list. It may be a simple case of not enough staff to keep up with the problems of running a server farm. Perhaps if he showed up at Ancestry's office with a basket of US $20 bills, he'd get more attention. But they may mistake him for a lost political candidate. Certainly we've been telling our politicians to get lost lately. Because his problem is not obvious, I will lay the problem on the software at Rootsweb's e-mail servers. Internet E-mail is normally a simple and reliable service, but if you make a mistake in configuring it, it will bite you! So have a sip of good sherry. At least one of my ancestors would. And keep on truckin'. Lou (list admin.) ----- Original Message ----- To: "eng-lincsgen" <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:21:54 AM Subject: [LIN] Message for Lou..not Lincs related ..Fwd: failure notice Hi Lou I hope you don't mind me forwarding this message via this list. It is the only way I can let Bart know that his messages from me and to/from the MARKHAM UK list keep bouncing. -------------------------------

The following have been added to the index: Lincoln Registration District (Rural parishes) All 1871-1911 unless otherwise stated: Metheringham, Navenby, Nettleham, Nocton, Normanby by Spital, North Carlton, North Hykeham, Owmby by Spital, Potterhanworth, Rand, Reepham, Riseholme, Saxby cum Owmby, Saxilby to Sep 1911 - next register missing, Scampton, Scothern and Skellingthorpe. 9,141 marriages now in this spreadsheet. Horncastle Registration District - all 1851-1911 unless otherwise stated: Asgarby, Ashby Puerorum (1837-1911), Asterby, Bag Enderby (1837-1911), Baumber (register closed in 1910). Gainsborough Registration District marriage spreadsheet updated. "Northolm" had been typed into the parish column instead of "Northorpe". Anne Anne Cole, President, Lincolnshire Family History Society Duncalf(e)/Duncuff/Duncuft One-name Study GOONS member 513 http://www.one-name.org/profiles/duncalf.html http://duncalfonenamestudy.tribalpages.com/ Lincolnshire Post 1837 Marriage Index http://mi.lincolnshiremarriages.org.uk/ Lincolnshire Family History Society http://www.lincolnshirefhs.org.uk

Hi Lou I hope you don't mind me forwarding this message via this list. It is the only way I can let Bart know that his messages from me and to/from the MARKHAM UK list keep bouncing. He has no problem sending messages to the LINCS list but to the MARKHAM UK list it is a different matter. I fail to understand why this happens. He has tried subscribing several times using a different email address but initially he is accepted then a little while later is removed and any messages he sends to the list gets bounced. I have sent a few messages to Rootsweb about this but they have not responded. I have also sent messages direct to Bart but, like the one I am forwarding, these get bounced so, on this occasion only, I am forwarding it via this list I would welcome any suggestions you may have to resolve this Apologies to all who have rad this non relevant message Victor MARKHAM UK List admin Note: Messages from any other MARKHAM UK subscribers go through as normal. Only Bart is affected -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: failure notice Date: 13 May 2016 09:41:03 +0100 From: MAILER-DAEMON@herc.layer1.co.uk To: victor@markham.me.uk Hi. This is the qmail-send program at herc.layer1.co.uk. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <cheers@iburst.co.za>: 41.213.80.12 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 421 Unexpected failure, please try later Giving up on 41.213.80.12. I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <victor@markham.me.uk> Received: (qmail 412 invoked by uid 10140); 6 May 2016 08:41:00 +0100 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from host86-151-159-0.range86-151.btcentralplus.com by herc.layer1.co.uk (envelope-from <victor@markham.me.uk>, uid 2020) with qmail-scanner-2.10st (mhr: 1.0. spamassassin: 3.3.2. perlscan: 2.10st. Clear:RC:1(86.151.159.0):. Processed in 0.02971 secs); 06 May 2016 07:41:00 -0000 Received: from host86-151-159-0.range86-151.btcentralplus.com (HELO ?192.168.1.67?) (86.151.159.0) by herc.layer1.co.uk with ESMTPA; 6 May 2016 08:41:00 +0100 Subject: Re: Fw: Unable to get subscribed To: Bart Simon <cheers@iburst.co.za> References: <92869118015F485790B68BBB08857E75@DESKTOP> From: Victor Markham <victor@markham.me.uk> Message-ID: <e4d0f1ec-6290-a2f8-ee61-7ea91c8b40b6@markham.me.uk> Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 08:40:44 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <92869118015F485790B68BBB08857E75@DESKTOP> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Bart I keep getting notified of bouncing, your subscribing and removal all the time from the list. Rootsweb notifies me of all members that have subscribed, bounced and removed. I have twice sent and email to rootsweb asking for an explanation. They have not bothered to reply...so far and it looks as if they never will (based on the time scale when I sent the first message) i also know you have tried subscribing using three different email addresses (thewanderer, tree and cheers) and that you have no problems sending messages (using thewanderer) to the LINCS list (yes I do read them there) I am at a loss as to what to do. I can only suggest you try another type of email address without @iburst.co.za at the end Victor On 05/05/2016 10:55 PM, Bart Simon wrote: > -----Original Message----- From: Bart Simon > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 11:46 PM > To: MARKHAM-UK-admin@rootsweb.com > Subject: Unable to get subscribed > > Hello Victor, I can't seem to stay subscribed to the MARKHAM-UK at > all. I have been testing solidly for a few days now before posting > this. I have checked my email address in my account is exactly the > same as the one I trying to subscribe with. If I go to my account and > refresh, it shows I am "subscribed", but after 10-20 minutes, I am > automatically unsubscribed, if I refresh my account page again, it > shows I am not subscribed any more. I also do not get any copy of any > email sent to the list for any one that does get through. I have tried > using different email addresses, but all from @iburst.co.za etc. Same > problem. I am unable to stay subscribed. I am currently trying to > subscribe with the email address of: cheers@iburst.co.za . Thanks - Bart. > > >

Thanks to Pam, Victor, and Nivard, You all responded quicker than Croydon Reg Office; shows what a good service this site provides. I have tended to use local facilities (keeps jobs?), but may now have to change my way of thinking, as they were quite willing to take my money straight away. I'll wait for todays post and if nothing is received chase it up again. Peter from very sunny (all week) Newcastle upon Tyne ======================================== Message Received: May 10 2016, 05:48 PM From: "Nivard Ovington via" To: eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Cc: Subject: Re: [LIN] Local Registry Offices Most local offices I have found to be very helpful, the ones that I have seen reported as being problematic are in the London area, although I haven't seen Croydon mentioned before Some won't even supply certificates until pushed to do so Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 10/05/2016 16:20, Peter Atkinson via wrote: > Hello List, > > Just wondering if anyone else has had any long delays receiving certificates from any Local Registry Offices. > > In the past I have had a very good service with a quick turn around, I think all have been received within a week of ordering either by post or on-line. > > Although not a specific Lincs question, my latest order was made on-line with Croydon, London on 6th April. > > I did send a reminder and after an email reply eventually got a phone call over a week ago, but still no certs. > > Peter > Newcastle upon Tyne ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Pamela.  I note you are using a samsung tablet. I am thinking about getting one myself. Can you tell me what model you have got please. Many thanks. Regards john Sent from my Samsung device -------- Original message -------- From: "pamela.baillie1 via" <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Date: 10/05/2016 16:41 (GMT+00:00) To: Peter Atkinson <patkinson@supertrout.wanadoo.co.uk>, eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LIN] Local Registry Offices I always order mine direct from GRO now, (follow link on freebmd) Usually quick and a copy of what is written unlike some I have received in the past from local register offices that have been hand written out with errors Sent from Samsung tablet -------- Original message -------- From: Peter Atkinson via <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Date: 10/05/2016  16:20  (GMT+00:00) To: eng-lincs gen <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Subject: [LIN] Local Registry Offices Hello List, Just wondering if anyone else has had any long delays receiving certificates from any Local Registry Offices. In the past I have had a very good service with a quick turn around, I think all have been received within a week of ordering either by post or on-line. Although not a specific Lincs question, my latest order was made on-line with Croydon, London on 6th April. I did send a reminder and after an email reply eventually got a phone call over a week ago, but still no certs. Peter Newcastle upon Tyne ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello List, Just wondering if anyone else has had any long delays receiving certificates from any Local Registry Offices. In the past I have had a very good service with a quick turn around, I think all have been received within a week of ordering either by post or on-line. Although not a specific Lincs question, my latest order was made on-line with Croydon, London on 6th April. I did send a reminder and after an email reply eventually got a phone call over a week ago, but still no certs. Peter Newcastle upon Tyne

Hi Pamela.  I note that you are using a samsung tablet. What model is it and do you find it useful. I have been thinking of getting one myself. RrgardsJohn Sent from my Samsung device -------- Original message -------- From: "pamela.baillie1 via" <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Date: 10/05/2016 16:41 (GMT+00:00) To: Peter Atkinson <patkinson@supertrout.wanadoo.co.uk>, eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [LIN] Local Registry Offices I always order mine direct from GRO now, (follow link on freebmd) Usually quick and a copy of what is written unlike some I have received in the past from local register offices that have been hand written out with errors Sent from Samsung tablet -------- Original message -------- From: Peter Atkinson via <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Date: 10/05/2016  16:20  (GMT+00:00) To: eng-lincs gen <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> Subject: [LIN] Local Registry Offices Hello List, Just wondering if anyone else has had any long delays receiving certificates from any Local Registry Offices. In the past I have had a very good service with a quick turn around, I think all have been received within a week of ordering either by post or on-line. Although not a specific Lincs question, my latest order was made on-line with Croydon, London on 6th April. I did send a reminder and after an email reply eventually got a phone call over a week ago, but still no certs. Peter Newcastle upon Tyne ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

So do I. One advantage is that the cost includes postage whilst the local office doesn't. It has been awhile since I ordered one from a local office but I recall having to send a SAE Victor On 10/05/2016 4:41 PM, pamela.baillie1 via wrote: > I always order mine direct from GRO now, (follow link on freebmd) > Usually quick and a copy of what is written unlike some I have received in the past from local register offices that have been hand written out with errors > > > > Sent from Samsung tablet > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Peter Atkinson via <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> > Date: 10/05/2016 16:20 (GMT+00:00) > To: eng-lincs gen <eng-lincsgen@rootsweb.com> > Subject: [LIN] Local Registry Offices > > Hello List, > > Just wondering if anyone else has had any long delays receiving certificates from any Local Registry Offices. > > In the past I have had a very good service with a quick turn around, I think all have been received within a week of ordering either by post or on-line. > > Although not a specific Lincs question, my latest order was made on-line with Croydon, London on 6th April. > > I did send a reminder and after an email reply eventually got a phone call over a week ago, but still no certs. > > Peter > Newcastle upon Tyne > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ENG-LINCSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Most local offices I have found to be very helpful, the ones that I have seen reported as being problematic are in the London area, although I haven't seen Croydon mentioned before Some won't even supply certificates until pushed to do so Nivard Ovington in Cornwall (UK) On 10/05/2016 16:20, Peter Atkinson via wrote: > Hello List, > > Just wondering if anyone else has had any long delays receiving certificates from any Local Registry Offices. > > In the past I have had a very good service with a quick turn around, I think all have been received within a week of ordering either by post or on-line. > > Although not a specific Lincs question, my latest order was made on-line with Croydon, London on 6th April. > > I did send a reminder and after an email reply eventually got a phone call over a week ago, but still no certs. > > Peter > Newcastle upon Tyne